@Tim.243 It got removed because someone complained that it was distracting from their request for Bullet Heads. and the Admin team agreed (I presume) because they don't see anything wrong with calling bullets 'bullet heads' ?
<Here it is>
//start//
Really, they are Bullets not Bullet heads.
Reloading is a complex and technical thing.
Retailers sell stuff to people, the more people they take money off the better.
Often (not always) they (RFD's) are clueless about what they are selling and tend to 'dumb down' to meet thier market and to take money from the uneducated and clueless.
A wider audience ....
They avoid conversations like ...
Customer : "Got any 223 bullets ?"
Retailer : "Hunting or Target, ? Box of 100 ?"
Customer ; "No mate I want bullets not heads"
It's easier for the retailer to just agree and take the money, educating his customers isn't a thing he wants (or has timer) to do.
No manufacturer calls bullets 'heads'... not one.
No RFD worth his salt calls bullets 'heads'.
Do you make head-holes in things when you shoot them ?
//end//
BTW, I don't think it's 'drivel' to try and call things by their right names, it does however become somewhat obtuse when after being informed that some folk can't get it right.
Some even do it deliberately, presumably because they think it's funny to misslead/missinform others.
Here's another example of why using the inncorrect term is wrong -
For Sale: - 243 mixed boxes of bullets some spent and other not. [ FAC / collected Lancashire]
A load "is an unspent bullet" ... surely he didn't mean that ? who would tell him that was correct ?
Do you think thats right
@Tim.243 ?