Being able to fill in a form online is hardly ‘computer wizardry’, it’s basic day-to-day stuff.I notice all you computer wizards are not offering to help the old guys out
Thanks - see my post #40 but good to have it up again.
Should we stop all progress because of a few?
Could say the same about lead...Should we stop all progress because of a few?
Times change, move with it or move over
Times are indeed changing but as possibly one of those "few", given a choice (CHOICE), I would rather submit to an in-person hands-on consultation with a GP than listen to the deliberations of an AI enhanced on-line diagnosis that is deemed to represent "progress".Should we stop all progress because of a few?
Times change, move with it or move over
Or just die - gosh that make it soooo much easier….Should we stop all progress because of a few?
Times change, move with it or move over
That's an interesting comparison, obviously the paper based system needs replacing with something better, same goes for lead, in both cases a superior alternative has yet to manifest itself, but that's no reason not to keep developing one.Could say the same about lead...![]()
That's easy like doing an electronic money transfer. i.e. both you and the other party log in separately to a central FLD clearing house with your own unique PIN & password. You both fill in the relevant details at the hub which then either authorises or voids a transaction. Such a system would have prevented the Luton killings and alerted the police to an attempt to unlawfully acquire a firearm.Question with a digital license how do you do a private sale?
No, it's not a waste of time, if it picks up on anomalies. For example, I at one time had a shotgun in my possession that was, inadvertently, not listed on my certificate and which the police were therefore unaware of. This was picked up on at the time of renewal, and added to my SGC.Currently on renewal I have to list the firearms I own and which the Police know about. That wastes both parties time, the renewal paper or electronic could so easily be repopulated with a lot of the data to improve efficiency.
My 6.5 Creed is listed as an "Original" even though the action is a Zermatt "origin" ... I pointed this out to the firearms team who said "we dont have Origin in the database so Original is the closest"...I have the e mail saved for when it comes upNo, it's not a waste of time, if it picks up on anomalies. For example, I at one time had a shotgun in my possession that was, inadvertently, not listed on my certificate and which the police were therefore unaware of. This was picked up on at the time of renewal, and added to my SGC.
A prepopulated form would not have included it, and it could well have slipped under the radar for another 5 years.
I agree that a lot of the form could be prepopulated, but each entry would still need to be checked for correctness, both by the applicant and by the police.