For Sale: PARD DS35 50 LRF GEN 2 - IN STOCK NOW !

What are these like compared to the Pulsar C50?
Ben
Depends what you want out of it.
If the LRF and ballistic calculator are important to you then the PARD is the right choice
If you need more magnification than the C50, the the PARD is the right choice
If you want a scope that runs on cheap and easily available 18650 batteries then the PARD is the right choice
If having reticle in the centre of the screen after it has been zeroed is important to you, then the PARD is the right choice
However, if you need a scope that performs well in low light (not complete darkness) then the C50 is miles better
If you want a scope that just feels better built, then the C50 is the right choice.

Cheers

Bruce
 
Thanks Bruce, when you mention it may not feel as well built as the pulsar would it stand up to holding zero on a centre fire and being rattled around on a quad bike? Most of the reviews I can find are from air gunners.
 
Depends what you want out of it.
If the LRF and ballistic calculator are important to you then the PARD is the right choice
If you need more magnification than the C50, the the PARD is the right choice
If you want a scope that runs on cheap and easily available 18650 batteries then the PARD is the right choice
If having reticle in the centre of the screen after it has been zeroed is important to you, then the PARD is the right choice
However, if you need a scope that performs well in low light (not complete darkness) then the C50 is miles better
If you want a scope that just feels better built, then the C50 is the right choice.

Cheers

Bruce
Not forgetting the weight & price differences too Bruce
 
I own an Alpex, C50 and a DS35 , to be honest they all have there strong points and merits.

None of the night vision tube styles have an inbuilt IR or LRF or ballistic application like the Pard DS, the IPS circular display is very crisp and the reticules excellent, FFP options.

If your shooting FAC airguns or rimfire at longer ranges the inbuilt 1 degree cant indication is a godsend, plus the DS adds minimal weight.

I'll upload some footage to share soon.
 
Thanks Bruce, when you mention it may not feel as well built as the pulsar would it stand up to holding zero on a centre fire and being rattled around on a quad bike? Most of the reviews I can find are from air gunners.
I've had one on my 6.5cm and 308 no issue's. It's substantially lighter than the c50, battery's are great. I've had the c50 Bruce is right in low light the c50 is the best but that's it. I found the base mag on the c50 too low I couldn't see bullet strikes at 100. The ballistic calculator on the pard is very good. With the price difference the pard for me is that bit better. Pulsar is still a good a choice espicially if you can get a good deal and you get a free workout lugging it about.
 
I'd imagine that's more down to the mounts mate.
Always in Spuhr. Thanks for the reviews I’ll seriously look at getting one of these the inbuilt Lrf is a great selling point. I currently run a Thermion 2 xq50 but not allowed on the night license.
 
Smart work sir !
I think that's just moved to the top of my list .
I'm assuming FAC air in the vids ?
What calibre and power if you don't mind me asking .
Regards
C
 
Smart work sir !
I think that's just moved to the top of my list .
I'm assuming FAC air in the vids ?
What calibre and power if you don't mind me asking .
Regards
C
FX IMPACT .25 700MM

Shooting 36gr .250 H&N at 960fps
 
Back
Top