Parker Hale bases

It's not quite clear from the last image if the objective bell of the scope is actually touching the rear sight or not.
If it is you need to remove the rear sight (not forgetting to drift it out to the right as the dovetail is usually tapered). Alternatively use a higher set of rings or a scope that that doesn't touch the rear sight.
It is very close but it isn't touching. It's so close I can't get the flip up cover on the front though! I assume the rear sight was brazed or welded on though so I may remove it to get the cover on.
 
I use a 1 inch metal bar to turn in the scope to almost centred on my mounts redfield/leupold types. A broom handle would maybe work too, just be aware that scopes are not designed to be used as a pry bar.
The scope inadvertently becoming a pry bar is my concern! I'll get it greased so it moves a bit easier then go from there. The last thing I want is a big dent in the tube!
 
It is very close but it isn't touching. It's so close I can't get the flip up cover on the front though! I assume the rear sight was brazed or welded on though so I may remove it to get the cover on.
Cut a relief in the cover. Avoid removing the open sight!
 
  • Like
Reactions: VSS
It is very close but it isn't touching. It's so close I can't get the flip up cover on the front though! I assume the rear sight was brazed or welded on though so I may remove it to get the cover on.

Pretty sure it's just friction fit in a dovetail. I love iron sights and do use them for deer, but since your scope is not in "return to zero" QD style mounts, realistically, you won't be using yours, and they are stopping you from using the scope cover you've bought.

Is the front sight assembly still good or has the rifle been threaded for a moderator?

If I were you I would remove the irons completely and probably keep them until I had an irresistible urge to tinker with something and put them back on!

The truth of the matter though is that your scope is worth more than your rifle, and that rear sight is essentially decorative with your current scope setup.

Advice you didn't solicit, worth as much as you paid for it 😉
 
I don't really want to cut it up so I suppose for now I'll put the cover in a place where I'll never be able to find it again when I want it!
Sand down a small part of the flip-up until it fits. That's what I did originally.
Or, better still, get a neoprene scope cover. That's what I've done now.
 
Pretty sure it's just friction fit in a dovetail. I love iron sights and do use them for deer, but since your scope is not in "return to zero" QD style mounts, realistically, you won't be using yours, and they are stopping you from using the scope cover you've bought.

Is the front sight assembly still good or has the rifle been threaded for a moderator?

If I were you I would remove the irons completely and probably keep them until I had an irresistible urge to tinker with something and put them back on!

The truth of the matter though is that your scope is worth more than your rifle, and that rear sight is essentially decorative with your current scope setup.

Advice you didn't solicit, worth as much as you paid for it 😉
I think I like the idea of using the iron sights but I suspect you're right and I'll never use them! It hasn't been threaded though and is in original condition with both front a rear sights present.
 
Sand down a small part of the flip-up until it fits. That's what I did originally.
Or, better still, get a neoprene scope cover. That's what I've done now.
I think the cover would be what I'd go for. None of my scopes have any covers though, apart from the .22 that has the original covers that came with the scope that have the rubber pieces that hole both covers on. Is having something cover the lenses better for storage/transport?
 
I think the cover would be what I'd go for. None of my scopes have any covers though, apart from the .22 that has the original covers that came with the scope that have the rubber pieces that hole both covers on. Is having something cover the lenses better for storage/transport?
Yes, storage and transport. That's when the dings mostly happen.
 
It hasn't been threaded though and is in original condition with both front a rear sights present.

In which case I rescind my previous suggestion of removing them. If you have both front and rear then they are still viable. Albeit your scope will get in the way.

If you really get the itch to use both you can do what I did which is install a set of Warne steel Weaver/Piccatinny bases (m902-830m) and Warne QD rings, which are also steel and return to zero. There are other QD solutions that claim to return to zero. At the time I did it the Warne rings and bases was the cheapest way I could find to do it all in steel, which I had convinced myself was necessary for consistency.

Anyway, you've put enough effort in now to get where you are, so probably the best thing is to get out and get her zeroed.
 
Back
Top