Sako 75 Kroseg stock feedback

Dietman

Well-Known Member
I have a Sako 75 stainless hunter and an looking for any feedback on the Kroseg precision carbon stock.

Has annoying got any feedback good, bad or indifferent?

Many thanks
 
I have a Sako 75 stainless hunter and an looking for any feedback on the Kroseg precision carbon stock.

Has annoying got any feedback good, bad or indifferent?

Many thanks
there was a post on here not long back - mixed at best from memory as I nearly ordered one before reading it!

I’ll try and find it..,
 
Running one personally
No issues

The post you are referring to was this one:


The machined bolt recess in that rifle was rough at the edge
I resolved it

Otherwise for the money they are excellent
Drop me a line if I can help

Thanks
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1475.webp
    IMG_1475.webp
    150.6 KB · Views: 115
  • IMG_1479.webp
    IMG_1479.webp
    186.4 KB · Views: 116
  • IMG_1476.webp
    IMG_1476.webp
    158.8 KB · Views: 115
Running one personally
No issues

The post you are referring to was this one:


The machined bolt recess in that rifle was rough at the edge
I resolved it

Otherwise for the money they are excellent
Drop me a line if I can help

Thanks
Thanks for the feedback. I'm based in Australia.
 
Hi all- I am Considering kroseg precision replacement stock for my Sako 85 Finnlight II in .300 win mag. I really like their recoil lug system that solves the original L shaped lug issue. I am looking for stable precision and a bit of weight savings. I won't be able to glass bed it. Gunsmith here in Switzerland don't really do that (not that i know), they consider it non necessary. I don't have the infrastructure and skills to do it myself. So bedding is not an option.

So my question is: Despite Krosegs advice to bed it, how bad is the downside of not bedding it.

I also must admit that what i read in this thread makes me think that the stocks really need gunsmith intervention, specially in view of the many maunfacturing variance in the product.

Your advice/opinions are welcome.
 
The stocks are CNC inlet
its best described as a firm push fit to seat the action
the action screw holes are metal tube lined. Pillars in other words!

Its beyond comprehension why Kroseg suggest milling out two pack epoxy compound that is CNC profiled to replace it with ....two pack epoxy compound...

can't see the benefit and the 6.5-284 I have in one shows no signs of anything detrimental

Work for the sake of work IMO
 
Hi all- I am Considering kroseg precision replacement stock for my Sako 85 Finnlight II in .300 win mag. I really like their recoil lug system that solves the original L shaped lug issue. I am looking for stable precision and a bit of weight savings. I won't be able to glass bed it. Gunsmith here in Switzerland don't really do that (not that i know), they consider it non necessary. I don't have the infrastructure and skills to do it myself. So bedding is not an option.

So my question is: Despite Krosegs advice to bed it, how bad is the downside of not bedding it.

I also must admit that what i read in this thread makes me think that the stocks really need gunsmith intervention, specially in view of the many maunfacturing variance in the product.

Your advice/opinions are welcome.

How does the recoil lug differ from the standard? I didn’t realise they were an alternative design.
 
The stocks are CNC inlet
its best described as a firm push fit to seat the action
the action screw holes are metal tube lined. Pillars in other words!

Its beyond comprehension why Kroseg suggest milling out two pack epoxy compound that is CNC profiled to replace it with ....two pack epoxy compound...

can't see the benefit and the 6.5-284 I have in one shows no signs of anything detrimental

Work for the sake of work IMO
Thanks for your answer, very helpful. Didin't know about to close to pillars action screws. Kroseg is probably underselling its products.
 
Back
Top