Tom D
Well-Known Member
This is possibly true, there must be plenty of rifles that do shoot well right out of the box though.Having wasted far more time and money than is rational chasing accuracy problems in a succession of rifles over the last few years, I'm increasingly inclined to believe that this sort of mediocre performance is actually entirely normal.
I suspect a lot lot of manufacturers rely on the fact that very few people test their guns systematically, and are generally happy to shoot a group of 3 and call the shot that goes 2 inches out a flyer, assigning it to shooter error or conditions rather than the gun.
The small proportion who do test systematically are then usually happy to spend more time and money fettling the gun or fine tuning the load. They end up with genuine sub-MOA guns, but only after going well beyond the factory gun.
I can't think of ANY other tool where actual performance falls so far and so frequently short of expectations and advertised performance. If our cars were this erratic, we'd be furious.
The thing is for the cost of the above rifle a very nice semi custom could be had that will almost certainly group sub moa. Both my centerfires are semi custom, and both cost less than £1500, quite a bit less actually. That's for the donor rifle, barrel labour and everything. And although not a guarantee, any smith worth his salt will stand by his work so if for any reason it doesn't shoot straight I'll bet the smith will get it sorted. Food for thought.....