Sako S20 Owners, Recoil Moving Mounts Back?

Quite some energy to dissipate, then. FCS had a spate of problems in this respect a few years back, the moderator mass at the end of the barrel changing the characteristics of the typical (unmoderated) recoil progression. Broken crosshairs ensued, the energy has to go somewhere, and it'll do its worst to escape via the weak spot in any design. Some make of Rifles (less liked than others) have lugs attaching the mounts directly to the barrel, shifting the potential problem toward the scope rings.
 
May I ask again. Are you using a muzzle break or a moderator? And if so, which type? We still haven't touched the bottom of what is causing the phenomenon.
Moderator mate, I have tried it with both my Freyr and Devik F280 and Wildcat Evo happens with both of them
 
Rather than go with Sako‘s 2-piece system, I went with Tier One 40mm Picatinny rings to fit my dS on my .308 Hunter and I’ve had no movement whatsoever. I like the lower profile too.

View attachment 178231
My initial thread says that mate I've tried the two piece tier one mounts also and they started moving rearwards also mate
 
I am using tier one two piece 30mms on my 308 s20 and haven't had any issues and I would say its the least recoiling 308 bolt action I've ever fired
 
Use Warne 2 piece Mountain Tech rings, move one forward to the front of the rail slot and the other to the rear of a rail slot, Torque down with their dedicated wrench and mount the scope in the rings.
 
I doubt it. Use of moderators and this type of mount is commonplace these days. Nonetheless it will be interesting to see what Sako says - please update us.
My thoughts to...perhaps a design fault they’ve missed....enter the gen 2 model ! or perhaps a recall !
 
As above.... but I would just put both mounts to the rear of the slot... hey presto... no more rearward movement!!...
I think its possible to get movement in both direction when a moderator is used. Positioning a ring forward in a front slot of the rail and the other rearward in the back slot covers all possible movement.
 
Quite some energy to dissipate, then. FCS had a spate of problems in this respect a few years back, the moderator mass at the end of the barrel changing the characteristics of the typical (unmoderated) recoil progression. Broken crosshairs ensued, the energy has to go somewhere, and it'll do its worst to escape via the weak spot in any design. Some make of Rifles (less liked than others) have lugs attaching the mounts directly to the barrel, shifting the potential problem toward the scope rings.
Yes, I think a lot of scope manufacturers moved to etched glass reticules. I had a Swarovski av 4-12×50 and it broke cross hair. After that I got a nf nxs. No problem since
 
Probably not very helpful but I have a S20 in .308 with a H2 mod and a Zeiss V6 56mm so quite a heavy scope. I use Leupold QRW mounts, both front and back against front edge of the picatinny rail and I haven’t had any of the problems you are experiencing.
 
Probably not very helpful but I have a S20 in .308 with a H2 mod and a Zeiss V6 56mm so quite a heavy scope. I use Leupold QRW mounts, both front and back against front edge of the picatinny rail and I haven’t had any of the problems you are experiencing.
Thanks mate that's what I want to hear from other S20 owners
 
Got an S20 and use variety of scopes using both picatinney and the Sako rail, fitted with DPT mod and have had no problems.It is .243 however
 
Back
Top