Sauer out the box accuracy (not )

If it looks like it, And it smells like it ! It probably is bull !
Bri2506 sounds like your mate has sold you a pup. The shop would not give you the cash back without Garlands say so !
What has Redmist got to prove ? He don't work for sauer
 
I believe the originating post was made in good faith (bri2506)


I dont think anything is to be gained by continuing the thread.


Several people shot the rifle, including myself, all had varied results - just goes to show that not every rifle brand suits every shooter.


Perhaps it should be left at that.
 
In my opinion it should have been the owner of the rifle that started the post not his mate as he had the issue with the rifle and Garlands. About time this post finished the fellow got his money back

Pendle
 
I'm NOT blaming Bri2506 as redmist said he more than likely posted in good faith !
What I was questioning was the information he had been given by the rifle owner.
 
My tuppence worth, twenty year old Sauer 202 18” standard ported barrel, Nosler 150gr ballistic tips, 44.5gr H4895 CCI benchrest primer in Lapua cases. Three in the 8 at 50 metres and two in the 4 at 100 metres, good to 250 metres if I do my bit on the big bits. Rifleman Firearms range on Monday morning. Chap shooting 6.5 Creedmoor shot even better groups at 100 metres.
 

Attachments

  • 31FCA950-BEA3-40ED-9A1C-53B4E03FCDCC.webp
    31FCA950-BEA3-40ED-9A1C-53B4E03FCDCC.webp
    114.3 KB · Views: 13
My tuppence worth, twenty year old Sauer 202 18” standard ported barrel, Nosler 150gr ballistic tips, 44.5gr H4895 CCI benchrest primer in Lapua cases. Three in the 8 at 50 metres and two in the 4 at 100 metres, good to 250 metres if I do my bit on the big bits. Rifleman Firearms range on Monday morning. Chap shooting 6.5 Creedmoor shot even better groups at 100 metres.
 
My 4 Sauer 202's hate RWS, Sako ammo but ❤ Federal, Winchester and i have stuck with Federal Power shok.
I’ve only ever put 40 factory rounds through my 202, just to get some fire formed cases, Norma back then and about the time they were have some bother with some of their ammo. The 150gr soft points were ok, if I recall correctly. Did load some 110gr for foxes, they were ok, but the 150 BTs have always been good :)
 
So what was the bottom line on this story.

There isn't one.

In theory, you could buy a bargain basement sporting rifle and a top tier custom and shoot them both with the same ammo for comparison.

If they were clamped in a vice and all external variables removed there is a possibility that the cheap rifle could out-shoot the super expensive custom one.

However, this is incredibly unlikely as the former could probably be churned out and assembled in less than a day whereas the latter will have been checked (you would hope!) at every stage for faults in the materials, component tolerance and test fired after finally assembly (all of which takes a long time, adding to cost).

Going back to the point about 'the same ammo', you could argue that this is too big a variable and ultimate accuracy can only be found through extensive load development for that particular rifle. Taking load development to such an extreme that every single variable and combination is explored will probably wear the barrel out (shooting a single 3 shot group is not doing it properly) so it is better to start in the ballpark and call it a day once the goal (hopefully realistic) has been achieved.

I would argue that a sporting rifle does not need to be sub MOA. Of course we all want them to be but more often than not I would wager that:

1- Most shooters are not good enough to hold (not shoot) the rifle steadier than 1 MOA, especially at distance. Can you keep the crosshairs within a one inch circle at 100 yards freehand, without a bipod and rear bag/support?

I can't but then again I don't claim to be good.

2- If you are deer stalking and need a follow-up shot, it is highly unlikely that the deer is going to be standing stone still in the same place as when the first shot was fired (like a target) unless you missed completely with the first shot, and that is your fault.

So, no point really.
 
If, as has been stated, Sauer find a 2.5" MOA acceptable, I wonder how many rifles they'd sell if they advertise this in the same way Tikka openly advertise an out of the box 1" MOA.
 
I've had three Sauer 202s over the years in various calibres, all shot very well indeed, from dealing with Sauer directly some years ago I would not think they would be particularly happy with one of theirs that shot that badly.
 
It turned out that the rifle shot just fine according to the guy that shot it - sauer never ever said 2.5” was fine, it was garlands: and frankly from what I’ve seen the guy that you talk to there is a bit of a ****. Steve Beaty at Ivythorn is far more pleasant from my experience.

my 202 has been faultless and so have all the other ones I’ve heard of, so much so I’ve just bought another 2nd hand 202 over a brand new 101 Pantera. (Good advice from Ivythorn that backed up what I was already thinking)

I think sauers are hard to beat where it be the accuracy, bolt or the system, if I had to find a fault it would be the alloy actions that some had mounting threads fail on but this was fixed by Sauer.

I think some people Want to bash slightly higher end equipment sometimes. Some people will say a Hawke is as good as a Z6 but people who have used them usually know better!

regards,
Gixer.
 
A friend has just taken charge of a sauer 243, with quick release mounting system developed by sauer for a sauer. This pretty setup has cost him in the ball park of £6500.
He has been playing around with different rounds and the best grouping gained was 3 inch, mainy 3 together and a couple of flyers out of 5 shot groups. No order as in the barrel heating up just random combinations.
So after speaking to sauer they confirmed there had a problem with the mounting system he then booked an appointment and today was the day of reckoning..........

After a long drive down and several different rounds tested by sauer in bench rest conditions they produced their test results. A 2 1/2 inch group............
According to sauer this more than acceptable group?

He owns quite a few rifles tikka, x bolts, Cz, all these rifles with factory ammo with a bit of tinkering have produced 3/4 to an inch groups.
i have a semi custom and a standard sako and anshutz but load my own but all these group less than 3/4 inch with factory ammo. All my rifles wouldn't cost the same as a his sauer.


The question I'm asking is, are we expecting too much from this rifle.

Cause I think I'd rather own the cheapest 40 quid secondhand battered unloved piece of s..t that shoots 3/4 inch all day than spend £6500 on a pretty lovely crafted piece of engineering than put in to field conditions you would be luck to hit deer at 50 yards in the vitals.
Similar happened to me with a Mauser M12. I bought a new sound moderator at the same time, MAE.
After fifteen rounds of Sako and Norma and 2"-3" groupat 100m I tried it without a mod' and with another mod'. In both instances the group shrunk to below 1MOA, as advertised! It wasn't the rifle, it was the new MAE! You don't say anything about a sound moderator being fitted?

Ooops.
Just read the 6 pages. Cancel my last, Out.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top