Sauer Wolverine or custom build?

I have a wolverine in 300wm i have taken roe and red and sika with it with no more meat damage than any other calibre i have just had the stock hydro dipped in carbon fibre got a duralyt on top which i think is a lot of scope for the money i love the rifle really accurate hardly any recoil because of the heavy stock.It is a heavy rifle prob to heavy for the hill for most people but i love it.i will put some pics on when my son comes round to technical for medads phone 184.webpdads phone 182.webp
 
Last edited:
Having had far too many rifles in my time of all sorts. I now have two 202 Sauers. Truly excellent rifles, very accurate, well engineered and look good. Personally I wouldn't want to lug a Wolverine about, too heavy, but the 202s are really light. I wouldn't change them
 
I have a wolverine in 300wm i have taken roe and red and sika with it with no more meat damage than any other calibre i have just had the stock hydro dipped in carbon fibre got a duralyt on top which i think is a lot of scope for the money i love the rifle really accurate hardly any recoil because of the heavy stock.It is a heavy rifle prob to heavy for the hill for most people but i love it.i will put some pics on when my son comes round to technical for me
look forward to see them;)
 
Thanks for the opinions everyone. Very encouraged by the feedback on the Sauer. If I lived in the US I would definitely have a try with a Cooper but I've never seen one here. Lovely looking rifles though. Their Montana Varminters are just my cup of tea.
6mm BR is too big. This is primarily a small vermin rifle. I want velocity, accuracy and a 400 yard range but small deer legal. Its a .22 CF I'm after but the triple is just falling short. I'm asking too much of it.
Not too fussed about the weight. My .222 is a heavy varminter BSA CF2 which is quite a lumpy rifle itself. I tote it around for hours on foot foxing and rabbiting and it doesn't bother me unduly.
There's no such thing as a do-it-all rifle. There's always a compromise somewhere. Muntjac stalking is where I'd least want the weight but that will be the least frequent task. Its mostly vermin and informal target so I'll have to take the weight and lump it on the deer.
My only slight doubt is whether the (I think) 1:14 twist of the Sauer will be OK. The rifle's main job is vermin, that's the most important. I've been trying to produce a load that will give me a minimum of 3500 fps from a 50 grain bullet. From that I could get a perfect single round for all my hunting requirements. Better still a 3800 fps lazer, barrel life accepted. I just can't get the triple to shoot well at 3500 with 50's. I can get the velocity or I can get accuracy, but not both. Bisley and my local club have a MV limit of 3280 fps. To make the most of Bisley the rifle needs to manage 600 yards. The 1:14 twist will be ideal for fast 50's but will it still be suitable for 60/65's at permitted velocity or 55's loaded down to it?
 
Thanks for the opinions everyone. Very encouraged by the feedback on the Sauer. If I lived in the US I would definitely have a try with a Cooper but I've never seen one here. Lovely looking rifles though. Their Montana Varminters are just my cup of tea.
6mm BR is too big. This is primarily a small vermin rifle. I want velocity, accuracy and a 400 yard range but small deer legal. Its a .22 CF I'm after but the triple is just falling short. I'm asking too much of it.
Not too fussed about the weight. My .222 is a heavy varminter BSA CF2 which is quite a lumpy rifle itself. I tote it around for hours on foot foxing and rabbiting and it doesn't bother me unduly.
There's no such thing as a do-it-all rifle. There's always a compromise somewhere. Muntjac stalking is where I'd least want the weight but that will be the least frequent task. Its mostly vermin and informal target so I'll have to take the weight and lump it on the deer.
My only slight doubt is whether the (I think) 1:14 twist of the Sauer will be OK. The rifle's main job is vermin, that's the most important. I've been trying to produce a load that will give me a minimum of 3500 fps from a 50 grain bullet. From that I could get a perfect single round for all my hunting requirements. Better still a 3800 fps lazer, barrel life accepted. I just can't get the triple to shoot well at 3500 with 50's. I can get the velocity or I can get accuracy, but not both. Bisley and my local club have a MV limit of 3280 fps. To make the most of Bisley the rifle needs to manage 600 yards. The 1:14 twist will be ideal for fast 50's but will it still be suitable for 60/65's at permitted velocity or 55's loaded down to it?

If you can wait a week I'm picking up my fully custom 20 tac
you would be welcome to come and see it / have a shot
you would then see if it's the way you could go custom wise
it's got the fast twist for the 50 /55 grain bullets
regards pete
 
If you can wait a week I'm picking up my fully custom 20 tac
you would be welcome to come and see it / have a shot
you would then see if it's the way you could go custom wise
it's got the fast twist for the 50 /55 grain bullets
regards pete

:roll: :roll: :roll: A WEEK :fib:

We had better put the flags out then Pete.:british:


:rofl: Just kidding Mate, it's taken some time, I really hope that it was worth the wait as I know how much you have been longing for it.
 
I can't comment on the 22-250 as I have never had the pleasureof owning one. However I do have a Sauer 202 .243 cal and have lost count how many thousands of rounds has been through this rifle. It must be the single best investment I have ever made and am saving at the moment to buy another Sauer in 30.06 but something a little special.
The major advantage is there is always a good second-hand market for Sauer’s so you should get a good return if you ever decide to sell it on.
Regards,
SS
 
Having had far too many rifles in my time of all sorts. I now have two 202 Sauers. Truly excellent rifles, very accurate, well engineered and look good. Personally I wouldn't want to lug a Wolverine about, too heavy, but the 202s are really light. I wouldn't change them

Snap!!
 
Thanks for the opinions everyone. Very encouraged by the feedback on the Sauer. If I lived in the US I would definitely have a try with a Cooper but I've never seen one here. Lovely looking rifles though. Their Montana Varminters are just my cup of tea.
6mm BR is too big. This is primarily a small vermin rifle. I want velocity, accuracy and a 400 yard range but small deer legal. Its a .22 CF I'm after but the triple is just falling short. I'm asking too much of it.
Not too fussed about the weight. My .222 is a heavy varminter BSA CF2 which is quite a lumpy rifle itself. I tote it around for hours on foot foxing and rabbiting and it doesn't bother me unduly.
There's no such thing as a do-it-all rifle. There's always a compromise somewhere. Muntjac stalking is where I'd least want the weight but that will be the least frequent task. Its mostly vermin and informal target so I'll have to take the weight and lump it on the deer.
My only slight doubt is whether the (I think) 1:14 twist of the Sauer will be OK. The rifle's main job is vermin, that's the most important. I've been trying to produce a load that will give me a minimum of 3500 fps from a 50 grain bullet. From that I could get a perfect single round for all my hunting requirements. Better still a 3800 fps lazer, barrel life accepted. I just can't get the triple to shoot well at 3500 with 50's. I can get the velocity or I can get accuracy, but not both. Bisley and my local club have a MV limit of 3280 fps. To make the most of Bisley the rifle needs to manage 600 yards. The 1:14 twist will be ideal for fast 50's but will it still be suitable for 60/65's at permitted velocity or 55's loaded down to it?

Hi Finch ,
Hope you dont mind me saying something regarding your comment that the 6BR is too big!!
Definitely not too big mate;)
You can run those 58 V-maxs at good velocities with less powder too - and when going muntie or Roe stalking you can load up those 85-95 grain soft points!!
I ran a 6PPC which ran the 58 V-maxs @3500fps = deadly accurate on Foxes and medium range vermin - and running Nosler 85SPs @3100 for Roe and Fallow does / all with 30 grains of powder too!! ( Viht N133 - H335 )...
Any which way i am sure you will have fun with your new toy when you get it;)
All the very best...
 
I think the Sauer 202 is a lovely rifle but I just don't like the safety and for me that puts it out of the running.
 
I think the Sauer 202 is a lovely rifle but I just don't like the safety and for me that puts it out of the running.

I never understood this as the safety is out of the way meaning you are not going to accidentally operate it until you put your finger anywhere near the trigger.

also it's a smooth silent "no click" design.

Now a mannlicher safety with the "roll and push" thing - that's a pita!

regards,
gixer
 
I think the Sauer 202 is a lovely rifle but I just don't like the safety and for me that puts it out of the running.

I think you are spot on there. I briefly owned a Sauer 90 and I didn't like this approach at all. A safety that is thumb operated and pushes forward to fire is what I'm looking for on my rifles and shotguns.

Regards JCS
 
Hi have a sauer 202 in .270win and a sauer outback in .308win, the outback is a later model with the built in weaver mounts so no thread stripping problems, both rifles are super accurate but for me the outback with an atec-maxim mod and fluted barrel is a lightweight rifle that is hard to beat, as for the safety, once you have used it a few times you will find that it is in the perfect position simply lift the trigger finger and you are ready to shoot.
cheers geoff
 
I think the Sauer 202 is a lovely rifle but I just don't like the safety and for me that puts it out of the running.

What's wrong with the safety? I haven't tried one yet.
Must admit I'm not a great fan if the Steyr system though it wouldn't be a deal breaker. My ideal safety would also be a simple thumb tab. On, off and that's it. No bells or whistles. I'm not that keen on the rocker tabs to the side of the receiver either. Most I've had I find I can't reach without upsetting my grip.
 
The safety uses a button on the top of the stock to engage but uses another one next to the trigger to fire, it is the one next to the trigger I don't like.

Try one you might like it, it seems to be a bit of a marmite feature.
 
The safety uses a button on the top of the stock to engage but uses another one next to the trigger to fire, it is the one next to the trigger I don't like.

Try one you might like it, it seems to be a bit of a marmite feature.

Marmite indeed, yes I think you could be right.
Had one or two rifles and could never never get on with the bolt push through the rear of trigger guard but the Sauer seems just right, it's two buttons are in exactly the correct place (for me). Those that don't like the Sauer safety, if you were to persevere you might end up liking it. I did and now I've got 4 of them.
I also love Marmite :)

Getting back to the original question, how can you compare a Wolverine with a custom gun?
With the Wolverine you can change stocks, forends, barrels of calibre and weight and also recievers.
So you can customise you own gun in minutes and as long as it's bought right and kept in good condition you wont lose a penny.
 
Back
Top