Morning All,
I wanted to share my recent experience with the above.
The practice in question (one of hundreds owned by CVS Group) used to be an independent vet until the original partner retired and CVS Group bought up the business. Historically the practice was first class and our farm account was there for donkeys years (as was my dads farm account).
Once CVS took over they stopped doing agricultural work and we moved the farm account however for reasons of convenience I left my Labradors registered there. My eldest lab showed signs of arthritis and as such along we went for a consultation. Options and treatment plans discussed and opted for Meloxaid.
After some time on the treatment I was informed that they need to see the dog every six months for a check and bloods.. this was never mentioned up front and to my knowledge is a slight tinkering around the guidance. I have no issue with paying for my dogs health and wellbeing BUT I don't like poor communication and financial surprises.
At the same time my friend has her working cockers also registered at the same practice, during their health check she asked the vet to check the dogs ears as the groomer had suggested there may be an infection. Vet checked ears, said there was some wax and took a swab, told my friend that it would cost £25 to check the swab in the lab. 24 hours later vet rings my friend to say they need to send the swab away, grow cultures etc etc and the cost would be £3200!!
Friend asks to use her insurance only to be told the practice don't deal with her particular insurance company and only deal with two providers! Nowhere is that knowledge given to patients / clients. My friend works for the NHS at our local hospital and has no means to pay that kind of money out, after much debate and tears the practice refused to speak to her insurers. She has subsequently changed vet to be told the dogs ears are fine, perfectly healthy and charged £25 quid for a check up!
The above are only a couple of instances but I'm aware of a few more. Am i being cynical to think that CVS Group are essentially creating their own workload? They own their own lab / pharma / insurance businesses and have recently been challenged by the Competition and Markets Authority.
Needless to say I have changed vet and moved to a truly independent vet who has informed me he only needs to see my lab once a year.
It just stinks in my humble opinion, insurance companies and individuals must be paying out thousands for treatments and checks that are not required.
I wanted to share my recent experience with the above.
The practice in question (one of hundreds owned by CVS Group) used to be an independent vet until the original partner retired and CVS Group bought up the business. Historically the practice was first class and our farm account was there for donkeys years (as was my dads farm account).
Once CVS took over they stopped doing agricultural work and we moved the farm account however for reasons of convenience I left my Labradors registered there. My eldest lab showed signs of arthritis and as such along we went for a consultation. Options and treatment plans discussed and opted for Meloxaid.
After some time on the treatment I was informed that they need to see the dog every six months for a check and bloods.. this was never mentioned up front and to my knowledge is a slight tinkering around the guidance. I have no issue with paying for my dogs health and wellbeing BUT I don't like poor communication and financial surprises.
At the same time my friend has her working cockers also registered at the same practice, during their health check she asked the vet to check the dogs ears as the groomer had suggested there may be an infection. Vet checked ears, said there was some wax and took a swab, told my friend that it would cost £25 to check the swab in the lab. 24 hours later vet rings my friend to say they need to send the swab away, grow cultures etc etc and the cost would be £3200!!
Friend asks to use her insurance only to be told the practice don't deal with her particular insurance company and only deal with two providers! Nowhere is that knowledge given to patients / clients. My friend works for the NHS at our local hospital and has no means to pay that kind of money out, after much debate and tears the practice refused to speak to her insurers. She has subsequently changed vet to be told the dogs ears are fine, perfectly healthy and charged £25 quid for a check up!
The above are only a couple of instances but I'm aware of a few more. Am i being cynical to think that CVS Group are essentially creating their own workload? They own their own lab / pharma / insurance businesses and have recently been challenged by the Competition and Markets Authority.
Needless to say I have changed vet and moved to a truly independent vet who has informed me he only needs to see my lab once a year.
It just stinks in my humble opinion, insurance companies and individuals must be paying out thousands for treatments and checks that are not required.


