reloader54
Well-Known Member
"So all sorted in post #6 then"


Quote;Also how does impacting the bullet tip set off an otherwise untouched primer with no other physical interference with the case head?Quote;
or what HAS been said,, but simply ignored.
"So all sorted in post #6 then"![]()
???
I am confused....what am I ignoring?
TURNBOLT described an event; ER referred to it and implied it was impossible, but he had added/presumed the condition of no interference which indeed made it impossible. I pointed out that TURNBOLT hadn't actually stated there was no interference...
Does that make sense now? Or did I misread the sequence entirely?
I have no reason to think TURNBOLT was lying about it, and so was looking for reasons which would explain the phenomena he described.
Any ideas, or do you think TURNBOLT was mistaken?
The only way I can imagine that a primer could be fired from inside by tapping the bullet into the case would be if a stainless tumbling media pin was stuck in the flash hole. Unlikely of course...but then again there are a couple of reports of primers firing when dismantling a round with a kinetic hammer....
Alan
Primers don’t seem to be that sensitive when impacted from the wrong side. I’ve (And others too) deprimed dozens of cases with live primers using a Lee Univeral die.
Ken.
I was referring to this Quote; I agree that with a cleaning rod up one end making it look like a spear gun and no bolt in the other the rifle becomes a bit like Oscar Wilde's horse...dangerous at both ends.quote;
and this,,untouched primer with no other physical interference with the case head?
Turnbolts post was not even posted at that time and has no bearing on the ops problem as its a completely different scenario.
as for tumbling pins stuck in flashholes,,,,,and other "what ifs" I'm surprised you can bring yourself to squeeze the trigger.
I see no issue with charging a customer a fee to cover the cost of the time and the outlay on the equipment.
???
I am confused....what am I ignoring?
TURNBOLT described an event; ER referred to it and implied it was impossible, but he had added/presumed the condition of no interference which indeed made it impossible. I pointed out that TURNBOLT hadn't actually stated there was no interference...
Does that make sense now? Or did I misread the sequence entirely?
I have no reason to think TURNBOLT was lying about it, and so was looking for reasons which would explain the phenomena he described.
Any ideas, or do you think TURNBOLT was mistaken?
The only way I can imagine that a primer could be fired from inside by tapping the bullet into the case would be if a stainless tumbling media pin was stuck in the flash hole. Unlikely of course...but then again there are a couple of reports of primers firing when dismantling a round with a kinetic hammer....
Alan
ffs sit on yer hands for a while.
I'm not in the slightest bit interested in anything about turnbolts post,[no offence Turnbolt] It has no bearing on Hussars op.
I'm not going to waste any more of this lovely sunny day on any futile dick swinging games you wanna play.
arguing on the internet is like competing in the "special olympics" you might win ,,,, but you're still retarded.
I'm off to bang some 300 yard gongs, bye and have a nice day.