Telos XP50 LRF very pleased.

hammo

Well-Known Member
I took the plunge recently and upgraded my thermal to a Telos unit. Had a walk during the daytime for the first try out, damp slightly misty conditions and high or ultra contrast setting cut through very well. LRF works as it should, remembering of course that at longer range you need a bigger target; best go for a tree, hedge or building when really reaching out far. Don't faff about trying to ping a deer itself, just go for the nearest object likely to give a good 'return' of the laser. Within the first few hundred meters though, its easy to ping animals.
Popped out Tuesday night and thermal conditions were good, so only used the normal contrast setting. Picture clear and crisp. The battery life is good of course, I dont think I will bother getting a spare; the ability to charge the unit directly from a powerbank which I already have, and carry on scanning is a great idea. I would like to look through some of the other brands on offer, really should get along to a thermal demo night one day.
Overall, I am very pleased with the unit, its as good as it should be at this price. I cant see image quality getting much better than this now. We must be nearing the crest of what is achievable with this technology, civilian units have now caught up with the military kit I was using in a past life.
A lot of the older or less expensive thermals on offer can get a bad reputation, but in reality most are perfectly useable. Its the fine image detail and performance in poor thermal conditions that set the higher end models apart.
Just my brief thoughts. Most of it is stating the obvious, but might be a little help to someone new to thermal spotters?
 
I doubt it, but I can only say how my experience has been. At this price I would be sending it straight back if it wasnt up to scratch. There was nothing wrong with my Helion XP50, but I had it a good while and could just about scrape together enough for an upgrade, beans on toast for a few weeks now though!
Maybe some folk are going out in poor thermal conditions and not adjusting settings? I would be surprised if Pulsar would be selling duff units.
 
I often think about knocking up a book, 'getting the most out of your thermal spotter'
A great deal of folks would get so much benefit from a basic understanding of how it all works, the limitations and advantages.
The default settings on most units, straight out of the box, will usually see you right; but there is so much more you can do with them.
 
I currently have a 'Telos' on loan whilst my (almost) 7yrs old XD 38 S is in 'TJ's' for attention to a 'Calibration Button' issue. So far I have been very impressed with the 'Telos'. Out again this evening in the Cumbrian fells so planning to 'fiddle' with the range finder some more.
I must say that my '38 S' has been faultless throughout, a brilliant piece of kit ! But, having had the use of this 'Telos' for a week or so I can 'feel an upgrade' coming on..! 😊
 
I currently have a 'Telos' on loan whilst my (almost) 7yrs old XD 38 S is in 'TJ's' for attention to a 'Calibration Button' issue. So far I have been very impressed with the 'Telos'. Out again this evening in the Cumbrian fells so planning to 'fiddle' with the range finder some more.
I must say that my '38 S' has been faultless throughout, a brilliant piece of kit ! But, having had the use of this 'Telos' for a week or so I can 'feel an upgrade' coming on..! 😊
I resisted the urge for a few months, but buckled in the end. Breaking strain of a wet kit-kat :lol::rolleyes::lol:
 
The Telos are great units and yes you do pay a premium for them, but some people overlook the overall build quality, things like 8-10hr battery life, larger eye display, better poor weather performance, etc

A lot get duped by a nice image up close, outside a shop or a gamefair, etc they don't test the properly out in the field in real world conditions...
 
I often think about knocking up a book, 'getting the most out of your thermal spotter'
A great deal of folks would get so much benefit from a basic understanding of how it all works, the limitations and advantages.
The default settings on most units, straight out of the box, will usually see you right; but there is so much more you can do with them.
Thermal crossover , thermal transitional phases ,understanding what you are seeing and how to best tune your kit to get the best out of it.

Most people just sell them , write them off as crap and spend a few hundred /thousand more
 
Filthy thermal conditions here last night, animals stand out well but most background totally lost. Experience tells me thats fine, but many would write off a thermal as rubbish based just on one trip out.
 
I took the plunge recently and upgraded my thermal to a Telos unit. Had a walk during the daytime for the first try out, damp slightly misty conditions and high or ultra contrast setting cut through very well. LRF works as it should, remembering of course that at longer range you need a bigger target; best go for a tree, hedge or building when really reaching out far. Don't faff about trying to ping a deer itself, just go for the nearest object likely to give a good 'return' of the laser. Within the first few hundred meters though, its easy to ping animals.
Popped out Tuesday night and thermal conditions were good, so only used the normal contrast setting. Picture clear and crisp. The battery life is good of course, I dont think I will bother getting a spare; the ability to charge the unit directly from a powerbank which I already have, and carry on scanning is a great idea. I would like to look through some of the other brands on offer, really should get along to a thermal demo night one day.
Overall, I am very pleased with the unit, its as good as it should be at this price. I cant see image quality getting much better than this now. We must be nearing the crest of what is achievable with this technology, civilian units have now caught up with the military kit I was using in a past life.
A lot of the older or less expensive thermals on offer can get a bad reputation, but in reality most are perfectly useable. Its the fine image detail and performance in poor thermal conditions that set the higher end models apart.
Just my brief thoughts. Most of it is stating the obvious, but might be a little help to someone new to thermal spotters?
 
Just got the new telos lrf xl50 , very very impressed although price was a sore pill to swallow , however i did get a really good deal from macleods of tain , if your thinking of buying one , give them a call before parting with your money , you will not be disappointed on what they will offer you 😜
 
I had a 35mm Telos LRFon demo for a week.
First night out was wet misty and yuk. We were shootingvrats but on way home stopped fir a comparison between my XQ38 and a Helion XQ38 .
Visually not alot between them Telos might have been a bit clearer but no vast differnce.
I tried it for a week in all conditions at all times day and night. I returned it. Basically apart from the LR there was no significant difference between the sight pictures. Biggest factor is my hands are too big to use the Telos comfortably.
It's a good unit if your buying for the first time but as an up grade I don't think it's money we'll spent.
D20240518_211643.webp20240518_211800.webp
 
Back
Top