The 10 Commandments of Logic.

The Singing Stalker

Well-Known Member
In light of some of the more heated? Heavily discussed? Differing opinions? Never the Twain shall meet? Discussions that seem to go on, I came across this,

Maybe it should become a sticky? :lol: :coat:

The 10 Commandments of Logic serve as essential guidelines for rational debate and critical thinking, helping to avoid common logical fallacies.

The 10 Commandments of Logic


  1. Thou shalt not attack the person's character, but the argument itself. (Ad Hominem)
  • Focus on the argument rather than personal traits or character flaws of the individual presenting it.
  1. Thou shalt not misrepresent or exaggerate a person's argument in order to make it easier to attack. (Straw Man Fallacy)
  • Avoid distorting someone’s position to refute it more easily; engage with their actual argument.
  1. Thou shalt not use small numbers to represent the whole. (Hasty Generalization)
  • Do not draw broad conclusions from insufficient evidence or a small sample size.
  1. Thou shalt not argue thy position by assuming one of its premises is true. (Begging the Question)
  • Ensure that your argument does not rely on an unproven assumption; each premise should be independently verified.
  1. Thou shalt not claim that because something occurred before, it must be the cause. (Post Hoc / False Cause)
  • Just because one event follows another does not mean the first caused the second; correlation does not imply causation.
  1. Thou shalt not reduce the argument down to two possibilities when others do or may exist. (False Dichotomy)
  • Avoid presenting a situation as having only two alternatives when there are more options available.
  1. Thou shalt not argue that because of our ignorance, a claim must be true or false. (Ad Ignorantiam)
  • Just because something has not been proven false does not mean it is true, and vice versa.
  1. Thou shalt not lay the burden of proof onto the person who is questioning the claim. (Burden of Proof Reversal)
  • The person making a claim is responsible for providing evidence to support it, not the skeptic.
  1. Thou shalt not assume "this" follows "that" when there is no logical connection. (Non Sequitur)
  • Ensure that conclusions logically follow from the premises; avoid leaps in reasoning.
  1. Thou shalt not argue that because a premise is popular, therefore it must be true. (Bandwagon Fallacy)

 
In light of some of the more heated? Heavily discussed? Differing opinions? Never the Twain shall meet? Discussions that seem to go on, I came across this,

Maybe it should become a sticky? :lol: :coat:

The 10 Commandments of Logic serve as essential guidelines for rational debate and critical thinking, helping to avoid common logical fallacies.

The 10 Commandments of Logic


  1. Thou shalt not attack the person's character, but the argument itself. (Ad Hominem)
  • Focus on the argument rather than personal traits or character flaws of the individual presenting it.
  1. Thou shalt not misrepresent or exaggerate a person's argument in order to make it easier to attack. (Straw Man Fallacy)
  • Avoid distorting someone’s position to refute it more easily; engage with their actual argument.
  1. Thou shalt not use small numbers to represent the whole. (Hasty Generalization)
  • Do not draw broad conclusions from insufficient evidence or a small sample size.
  1. Thou shalt not argue thy position by assuming one of its premises is true. (Begging the Question)
  • Ensure that your argument does not rely on an unproven assumption; each premise should be independently verified.
  1. Thou shalt not claim that because something occurred before, it must be the cause. (Post Hoc / False Cause)
  • Just because one event follows another does not mean the first caused the second; correlation does not imply causation.
  1. Thou shalt not reduce the argument down to two possibilities when others do or may exist. (False Dichotomy)
  • Avoid presenting a situation as having only two alternatives when there are more options available.
  1. Thou shalt not argue that because of our ignorance, a claim must be true or false. (Ad Ignorantiam)
  • Just because something has not been proven false does not mean it is true, and vice versa.
  1. Thou shalt not lay the burden of proof onto the person who is questioning the claim. (Burden of Proof Reversal)
  • The person making a claim is responsible for providing evidence to support it, not the skeptic.
  1. Thou shalt not assume "this" follows "that" when there is no logical connection. (Non Sequitur)
  • Ensure that conclusions logically follow from the premises; avoid leaps in reasoning.
  1. Thou shalt not argue that because a premise is popular, therefore it must be true. (Bandwagon Fallacy)

Thou shalt not criticise membership organisations no matter how much they're out of step with the shooting community!
 
In light of some of the more heated? Heavily discussed? Differing opinions? Never the Twain shall meet? Discussions that seem to go on, I came across this,

Maybe it should become a sticky? :lol: :coat:

The 10 Commandments of Logic serve as essential guidelines for rational debate and critical thinking, helping to avoid common logical fallacies.

The 10 Commandments of Logic


  1. Thou shalt not attack the person's character, but the argument itself. (Ad Hominem)
  • Focus on the argument rather than personal traits or character flaws of the individual presenting it.
  1. Thou shalt not misrepresent or exaggerate a person's argument in order to make it easier to attack. (Straw Man Fallacy)
  • Avoid distorting someone’s position to refute it more easily; engage with their actual argument.
  1. Thou shalt not use small numbers to represent the whole. (Hasty Generalization)
  • Do not draw broad conclusions from insufficient evidence or a small sample size.
  1. Thou shalt not argue thy position by assuming one of its premises is true. (Begging the Question)
  • Ensure that your argument does not rely on an unproven assumption; each premise should be independently verified.
  1. Thou shalt not claim that because something occurred before, it must be the cause. (Post Hoc / False Cause)
  • Just because one event follows another does not mean the first caused the second; correlation does not imply causation.
  1. Thou shalt not reduce the argument down to two possibilities when others do or may exist. (False Dichotomy)
  • Avoid presenting a situation as having only two alternatives when there are more options available.
  1. Thou shalt not argue that because of our ignorance, a claim must be true or false. (Ad Ignorantiam)
  • Just because something has not been proven false does not mean it is true, and vice versa.
  1. Thou shalt not lay the burden of proof onto the person who is questioning the claim. (Burden of Proof Reversal)
  • The person making a claim is responsible for providing evidence to support it, not the skeptic.
  1. Thou shalt not assume "this" follows "that" when there is no logical connection. (Non Sequitur)
  • Ensure that conclusions logically follow from the premises; avoid leaps in reasoning.
  1. Thou shalt not argue that because a premise is popular, therefore it must be true. (Bandwagon Fallacy)

Imagine using this logic and applying it to the lead ammunition proposed legislation.
Even better ……. Apply it to the so called scientific study 🍿
 
Back
Top