Venison Price drop!

Estates and landowners charge people simply because they can.

If we had widespread public access hunting in the UK then these estates would struggle. People would go elsewhere just as they do in countries that have public hunting land.

Unfortunately this is the situation we're in and all the while people are willing to pay then there will always be someone happy to charge them.
Of course people will always be willing to pay for the privilege of hunting on some of the best, most beautiful, historic, productive and CONVENIENT places in the world… and rightly so.
We have the absolute cream of it right here in the UK…. Estates often have multiple deer species with superb genetics, hygienic larder facilities, ample parking….decent pubs nearby…game bird shooting, usually excellent fishing opportunities.
You can’t realistically expect to be paid to do all this stuff
 
Of course people will always be willing to pay for the privilege of hunting on some of the best, most beautiful, historic, productive and CONVENIENT places in the world… and rightly so.
We have the absolute cream of it right here in the UK…. Estates often have multiple deer species with superb genetics, hygienic larder facilities, ample parking….decent pubs nearby…game bird shooting, usually excellent fishing opportunities.
You can’t realistically expect to be paid to do all this stuff

Those sort of places exist elsewhere in the world too and people do pay, but a lot less people pay because there are thousands of other opportunities. The UK is massively different because of the fact we can sell wild venison, that fact alone turns it into a money generating business/hobby compared to other countries.

Those same beautiful estates dont charge people to trap their rats in order to keep the estate looking nice and not being over run. This is because people dont want to pay to provide this service. If rats suddenly became a popular trophy then I'm sure that would change.
 
My 2 pennies worth is, If your taking carcasses to an aghe then your registered with your local council so you have the option to butcher & sell or take the hit on the price at the aghe.
Who doesn't? Stalkers?
There's a lot of grant money floating about out there, if you care to look for it:
My DSC1 course was subsidised by Welsh Government. My larder was grant funded. Highseats were provided by the Deer Initiative. Next week I'm attending a fully-funded venison butchery course. The design of my venison logo and my marketing material was grant funded. And so on.....
I think its great that the government & organisations help with grants/setup costs etc, all you hear from them is deer numbers are the highest they've been since records started.
out of interest what do they expect back from there investment? I'm assuming for wild deer so your helping with reducing the numbers, is there a need to pay back the monies over a period of time? do they actually check if your doing what you say you will?
unfortunately I doubt they pay retrospectively which is a shame as my chiller's & butchery setup are already complete but I'm certainly helping reduce the numbers. maybe they will pay my electric 😃
 
My 2 pennies worth is, If your taking carcasses to an aghe then your registered with your local council so you have the option to butcher & sell or take the hit on the price at the aghe.

I think its great that the government & organisations help with grants/setup costs etc, all you hear from them is deer numbers are the highest they've been since records started.
out of interest what do they expect back from there investment? I'm assuming for wild deer so your helping with reducing the numbers, is there a need to pay back the monies over a period of time? do they actually check if your doing what you say you will?
unfortunately I doubt they pay retrospectively which is a shame as my chiller's & butchery setup are already complete but I'm certainly helping reduce the numbers. maybe they will pay my electric 😃
The reason why primary producers can access grant funding so readily is because by injecting funds at the top the money filters down the chain and ends up supporting smaller ancillary rural businesses. So, for example, agricultural support payments end up in the pockets of people like @Tim.243, who repairs, and fabricates parts for, agricultural machinery.
The same sort of thing with my venison business. There's a lot of support out there from regional administrations for small-scale food businesses because it keeps the money local, and recirculates it into the economy of the area. For example, I pay a small local company to service my refridgeration unit. And, if those small food businesses get the support they need in order to grow then there's a hope that they'll ultimately provide employment in the area.
There is no need to pay back grant monies, provided that they're used only for the purpose that they were intended, and that you continue trading for a certain minimum period. (For example, when I received a significant grant in 2003 towards the cost of a new 60ft x 60ft building to house livestock in the winter, there was an obligation on me to use the building for agricultural purposes for a minimum period of 10 years, otherwise I would have had to repay the grant).
 
The reason why primary producers can access grant funding so readily is because by injecting funds at the top the money filters down the chain and ends up supporting smaller ancillary rural businesses. So, for example, agricultural support payments end up in the pockets of people like @Tim.243, who repairs, and fabricates parts for, agricultural machinery.
The same sort of thing with my venison business. There's a lot of support out there from regional administrations for small-scale food businesses because it keeps the money local, and recirculates it into the economy of the area. For example, I pay a small local company to service my refridgeration unit. And, if those small food businesses get the support they need in order to grow then there's a hope that they'll ultimately provide employment in the area.
There is no need to pay back grant monies, provided that they're used only for the purpose that they were intended, and that you continue trading for a certain minimum period. (For example, when I received a significant grant in 2003 towards the cost of a new 60ft x 60ft building to house livestock in the winter, there was an obligation on me to use the building for agricultural purposes for a minimum period of 10 years, otherwise I would have had to repay the grant).
thanks well explained, well done for looking into it in the first place.
 
My 2 pennies worth is, If your taking carcasses to an aghe then your registered with your local council so you have the option to butcher & sell or take the hit on the price at the aghe.
Not exactly true, you can have the necessary large game handling qualifications and be a registered business with the council but not be permitted to sell butchered carcasses.
 
Not exactly true, you can have the necessary large game handling qualifications and be a registered business with the council but not be permitted to sell butchered carcasses.
Fair enough, if you've got that far then you could go the extra length to do so though.
 
Oh come on Ade! Don't disapoint the poor fellow! You know exactly why @Tim.243 tagged you: He was relying on you to make some scathing remarks about anyone who claims grant funding or any kind of financial support for their business.
If I feel I have something worthwhile to add to the thread I will do so. I don't need any prompting

Ade :cool:
 
I think one thing to fix first is the dealers encouraging head shots by offering slightly more on those. If we stalkers kick back on that it would be a start at least.
Why?
Chest shot deer often lose a shoulder or more so why would a dealer not reward the guy who turns up with a clean 100% carcass?
 
I think one thing to fix first is the dealers encouraging head shots by offering slightly more on those. If we stalkers kick back on that it would be a start at least.
They've either got to pay more for a head shot carcass, or less for a chest shot carcass. Which would you rather?
It's unreasonable to expect them to pay the same for both, when one will have a significant amount of waste (that they have to pay for the disposal of) and a much lower yield of saleable meat.
 
I think one thing to fix first is the dealers encouraging head shots by offering slightly more on those. If we stalkers kick back on that it would be a start at least.
I butcher a lot of my deer and would always head/neck shoot anything I am going to butcher. I can't see why the game dealers would be any different in what they want to butcher.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VSS
Back
Top