Why has this happened, (bullet drop)

not massively keen on pushing things to the limit,
Who told you you are near the limit?

There is always knitting if it's all too too much.

I don't understand these reloading fears, must make for a miserable time of it.
Lots of them even have a tank of air in the house with a container or more of air sqoze into it 🙄
 
You need to stick a load more powder in your cartridges! Those 243 velocities are real slow. As an example - your 243 with 90g tgk at 2655fps. My load in said 243 with same bullet and powder is 3200fps with a 20 inch barrel.

As has already been mentioned, are your scales calibrated? Also worth noting there aren't issues hitting pressure signs presuming its done safely. Pick a suitable bullet and powder combination that gives desired velocity, load it up and shoot one at a charge weight until you hit pressure then back off. You will more than likely find a node around that charge anyway.

For targets - I find a diamond shape gives a far better target for shooting groups. You've induced a potential inch error straight away in your groups whereas the tip of a diamond gives you a tiny aim point and your groups will probably look better for it.
 
more powder it is then 👍
Who told you you are near the limit?

There is always knitting if it's all too too much.

I don't understand these reloading fears, must make for a miserable time of it.
Lots of them even have a tank of air in the house with a container or more of air sqoze into it 🙄
just going on vhit app, i know there all conservative👍
 
until recently id never even thought to chase MV, i just found a group that worked and tinkered with the seating depths, then went with that, having had a magneto in the past i just used it to tell me my speeds, ES & SD, i now have another magneto so id best get my speeds up, i guess i should work out if to use the 75gr or the 90gr, saying that i did also try the 87gr V max and that was ok too, im also thinking N160 woud be best over the 140, i only chose that as i wanted to stick with 1 powder,
 
I just want to go back to these, "get more powder in it" comments, and i know that some sites are conservative,
iv not really been over book recommendations before so it new to me, i know what pressure signs to look for,
so for instance i was loading 23,5 gr of n140 in my 223 using sierra 69gr bullets, it was half MOA MV was around 2600.
i tried some more charges and got that to 2800 at 25,5gr, that being book limit, i did also try 26gr with n o pressure signs that ran at 2850,
some way off the suggested speeds i should be at, picture shows 26,5gr
now im no expert on GRT but (if iv set everything right) that 26.5gr is dangerous at 95,8% load ratio and a burn rate of 100%
so what sort of burn rate and load ratio should i be looking for,
25.5gr is load ratio 92% and burn rate of 99.9%.
25gr is,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,90%,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,97%
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6908.webp
    IMG_6908.webp
    49.9 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
I just want to go back to these, "get more powder in it" comments, and i know that some sites are conservative,
iv not really been over book recommendations before so it new to me, i know what pressure signs to look for,
so for instance i was loading 23,5 gr of n140 in my 223 using sierra 69gr bullets, it was half MOA MV was around 2600.
i tried some more charges and got that to 2800 at 25,5gr, that being book limit, i did also try 26gr with n o pressure signs that ran at 2850,
some way off the suggested speeds i should be at, picture shows 26,5gr
now im no expert on GRT but (if iv set everything right) that 26.5gr is dangerous at 95,8% load ratio and a burn rate of 100%
so what sort of burn rate and load ratio should i be looking for,
25.5gr is load ratio 92% and burn rate of 99.9%.
25gr is,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,90%,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,97%

Are you absolutely sure your scales are calibrated? And your GRT numbers look off too. I suggest you get someone to look at your inputs, or even better, have an experienced and knowledgeable reloader come over and review your gear and process.
 
I just want to go back to these, "get more powder in it" comments, and i know that some sites are conservative,
iv not really been over book recommendations before so it new to me, i know what pressure signs to look for,
so for instance i was loading 23,5 gr of n140 in my 223 using sierra 69gr bullets, it was half MOA MV was around 2600.
i tried some more charges and got that to 2800 at 25,5gr, that being book limit, i did also try 26gr with n o pressure signs that ran at 2850,
some way off the suggested speeds i should be at, picture shows 26,5gr
now im no expert on GRT but (if iv set everything right) that 26.5gr is dangerous at 95,8% load ratio and a burn rate of 100%
so what sort of burn rate and load ratio should i be looking for,
25.5gr is load ratio 92% and burn rate of 99.9%.
25gr is,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,90%,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,97%
I've never heard of all that mumbo jumbo nor desire to understand it.
Complete overthinking balderdash.

There is nothing dangerous about n140 in 223.
 
On the vhit data I don't even look at the starting nonsense, a waste a very expensive powder and bullets and primers!
Agreed.

When I first started I was rigid, then as I became more experienced and understood it more I found iut how important good case fill is - 90% plus.

For that reason I look at powders that give a good fill at max charge and when load developing I take 10% off the max charge and use that as my start.

10% doesn't sound much but when dealing with somthing thats light anyway it makes a huge variance and is well below safe max change.

Vhit is also very conservative with their load data so top 10% puts you in a safe bracket to get good velocity without wasting powder.
 
I just want to go back to these, "get more powder in it" comments, and i know that some sites are conservative,
iv not really been over book recommendations before so it new to me, i know what pressure signs to look for,
so for instance i was loading 23,5 gr of n140 in my 223 using sierra 69gr bullets, it was half MOA MV was around 2600.
i tried some more charges and got that to 2800 at 25,5gr, that being book limit, i did also try 26gr with n o pressure signs that ran at 2850,
some way off the suggested speeds i should be at, picture shows 26,5gr
now im no expert on GRT but (if iv set everything right) that 26.5gr is dangerous at 95,8% load ratio and a burn rate of 100%
so what sort of burn rate and load ratio should i be looking for,
25.5gr is load ratio 92% and burn rate of 99.9%.
25gr is,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,90%,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,97%
If you want some help/advice more than happy to help if you send me a PM.

Probably the reason your getting a strange es/sd is because the powder charge isnt sufficient so your getting diffrent powder burns when the primer is igniting the chage as that makes a difference- hence the case fill being important
 
Agreed.

When I first started I was rigid, then as I became more experienced and understood it more I found iut how important good case fill is - 90% plus.

For that reason I look at powders that give a good fill at max charge and when load developing I take 10% off the max charge and use that as my start.

10% doesn't sound much but when dealing with somthing thats light anyway it makes a huge variance and is well below safe max change.

Vhit is also very conservative with their load data so top 10% puts you in a safe bracket to get good velocity without wasting powder.
I hardly drop back that much, maybe in my 3030 but not the standard cases based around 223/222 or 3006/308/243 cases in strong bolt actions.
 
Agree with the last couple of posts here, especially regarding Vhits conservative load data.

My 308 load with N140 gives a lovely crunch when seating the bullet 😆 no pressure signs, I'd put more in if there was space! (Obviously I worked up to this etc etc...)

Attached is garmin results from the 308 compressed load, look at the SD & ES 👌🏽

What are you weighing out your charges on?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20251220_105828_WhatsApp.webp
    Screenshot_20251220_105828_WhatsApp.webp
    97 KB · Views: 14
Are you absolutely sure your scales are calibrated? And your GRT numbers look off too. I suggest you get someone to look at your inputs, or even better, have an experienced and knowledgeable reloader come over and review your gear and process.
I calibrate my scales every time i use them, im probably not going to bother with GRT as im not sure everything is right, its easier to lookout for pressure signs 👍
 
If you want some help/advice more than happy to help if you send me a PM.

Probably the reason your getting a strange es/sd is because the powder charge isnt sufficient so your getting diffrent powder burns when the primer is igniting the chage as that makes a difference- hence the case fill being important
my last testing halved my ED & SD when going up in powder, so thats the plan, keep going till i see pressure signs:D
 
Agree with the last couple of posts here, especially regarding Vhits conservative load data.

My 308 load with N140 gives a lovely crunch when seating the bullet 😆 no pressure signs, I'd put more in if there was space! (Obviously I worked up to this etc etc...)

Attached is garmin results from the 308 compressed load, look at the SD & ES 👌🏽

What are you weighing out your charges on?
i use a chargemaster lite, and them figures are outrageous :D
 
I hardly drop back that much, maybe in my 3030 but not the standard cases based around 223/222 or 3006/308/243 cases in strong bolt actions.
Tbf I also ladder test over a chrono
Just load a round of each asnd dhoot a string over a chrono.

Once I find a node I play around that area to find stability
 
todays test, as iv started some new brass, 3 of my old loads and one at 44gr which is .4gr over hornadys max, and .4 less than Viht, already made these a couple of days ago,
no pressure sighs so far so all good to go further, hopefully something above 44gr groups ok, i know iv got seating depths to play with, currently 20 thou off the lands,
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6921.webp
    IMG_6921.webp
    197.4 KB · Views: 14
Back
Top