It’ll depend on calibre, height of the scope above the bore. Does your scope have a reticuleJust a bit of fun.
It happened to me this morning.
No cheating.
I know and I thought, aim higher... I just did this properly yesterday too which is why I feel so stupidLower, the same reason DSC shooting tests are getting people to perform a dispatch shot in the head of a roe silhouette.
All other things being equal, that is the correct answer, but in real life it's a scenario that's within the parameters of point and shoot, I believe. Any nearer, and you'd need to make allowance.Lower, the same reason DSC shooting tests are getting people to perform a dispatch shot in the head of a roe silhouette.
I've done point blank despatch shots on road traffic or diseased animals where I'm six feet away. I aim about two inches high which allows for the distance between the sightline of the scope and the centre of the bore.All other things being equal, that is the correct answer, but in real life it's a scenario that's within the parameters of point and shoot, I believe. Any nearer, and you'd need to make allowance.
Yes. There's a big difference between 6ft and the 35m suggested in the OP.I've done point blank despatch shots on road traffic or diseased animals where I'm six feet away. I aim about two inches high which allows for the distance between the sightline of the scope and the centre of the bore.
I had to shoot a roe buck which had a terrible head wound and severe insepticemia - head crawling with maggots and stinking. It was too weak to run and it in some undergrowth at the bottom of a garden. I got to within six feet of it and had a clear shot at the back of its head. I aimed about half an inch above the top of the skull right between the pedicles. Suffering over, job done.
Meen while the fox is tucking into the pheasants...Just shoot.
