Picked up on this by a link on FB.
https://ukshootingnews.wordpress.co...e-and-enforce-firearms-law-we-must-stop-this/
https://ukshootingnews.wordpress.co...e-and-enforce-firearms-law-we-must-stop-this/
I have a reputation for org bashing, apparently, so please take these comments in that light,i if you wish.
We have been told that recent changes to firearms law were to be welcomed and part of the negotiation(?) to achieve a ten year certificate. Andy Marsh, FELWEG lead, who is apparently seeking this change to implementation of the Guidance, is doing it not for the benefit of public safety but as a means of control. Some organisations have been duped by Marsh's motives in the past and walked blindly into further controls which we have been advised were never going to be conceded.
I think the time has come to insist on formal consultation and the opportunity for shooting orgs to appeal directly to the Secretary of State. If anyone can accept the police making the law rather than advising on the making of it then they shouldnt be in shooting. Remember the 'shop a shooter' fiasco - that was Marsh, supported by one org until it blew up in their faces. This man and his supporting shooting organisation can not be trusted to see further than their own obsession with being at the top of the shooting tree.
If that is org bashing then it is needed before more is allowed to slip through our fingers.

I contacted BASC to enquire about this, their answer seemed reasonable; this is all theoretically possible, but the government generally adheres to the principles of better regulation, meaning consulting with BASC etc. is already part and parcel of this.
EJ perhaps you ought to be a bit more paranoid like our U.S. Cousins, then you might be treated as equal citizens.
I contacted BASC to enquire about this, their answer seemed reasonable; this is all theoretically possible, but the government generally adheres to the principles of better regulation, meaning consulting with BASC etc. is already part and parcel of this.