Clearly not that much!! It seems your grasp of literacy is on par with your grasp of numbers!! Stop being so myopic about your daughters future.
.....daughters'.....
Clearly not that much!! It seems your grasp of literacy is on par with your grasp of numbers!! Stop being so myopic about your daughters future.
No. That's a myth. I worked in a very large NHS Hospital as Supplies Liaison Officer in the last year of the "old" NHS and the first year of Thatcher's "new" Trust NHS with privatised this and privatised that.
The MRS problem was directly down to Thatcher's privatisation of in hospital cleaning services by the Conservative Government. I'll explain.
Before the cleaning services were privatised all the cleaning products, the mops, the brooms and the etc. were kept on the wards and accessible 24/7 to those on the wards. These things were, after all, bought and paid for by the NHS and thus anybody could access and use them at ANY time of the day, on Bank Holidays, on Christmas Day and etc..
Thus even though the actual cleaning staff might not be on duty or elsewise unavailable one of the Ward Clerks, one of the Nursing Auxiliaries, or usually one of the Porters could be asked to get the stuff out and clean any "spillages" or whatever needed. Usually the porters who would have one or two on duty 24/7 and did everything and anything when "needs must".
If not a hospital with a 24/7 portering service it would be tasked to one of the Nursing Auxiliaries of which there would be at least one on duty on each ward or unit 24/7.
After privatisation the cleaning products, the mops, the brooms and the etc. were taken off the wards as they were no longer bought and paid for by the NHS but by the privatised cleaning supplier were either taken off the wards or kept locked up and available ONLY to the staff of these new privatised cleaning suppliers
Usually SERCO in my time. So, as said, these items were kept under lock and key to which non SERCO staff had no access. After all the "owner" of these was now SERCO and SERCO was not going to allow the NHS (which hadn't paid for these things) to use them free as it were.
Thus if there were then a spillage it got left until the privatised cleaning supplier's cleaners were back on duty and, like everything else, as the more cleaning product got used the less profit SERCO made the cleaning product was used sparingly. As the staff of these privatised cleaners had to account for every last capful of cleaning product.
So the Matron myth is, I have to say, a story peddled by Conservative Health Ministers and their cronies to avoid truth about the real reason for the problem of MRS which is their privatisation of the in-hospital cleaning services.
Clearly not that much!! It seems your grasp of literacy is on par with your grasp of numbers!! Stop being so myopic about your daughters future.
All very well explained, but I go back a long way before Maggie and obviously you,yourself.
Believe me I spent quite a lot of time in hospital for treatment of injuries and the Matron role was not a myth,they ran the hospitals with a hard hand.
It was obvious to me that this was conducive to the lack of wound infection in my time. If I received the same wounds now, i think I would rather rely for cleanliness on a Field hospital with a good surgeon and nurses than trust today's regime.
As an interesting note,my tonsils were removed by our local Doctor,not in a hospital, and with no infection afterwards. Some say the bad old days,some say the good, how things have changed, but not necessarily for the better in the NHS.![]()
I don't understand why people keep mentioning trade deals, trade deals are not required, trade deals reduce a country's ability to be competitive.
Below is Patrick Minford one of the world's leading economist's trying to explain to parliament why we don't need trade deals:
There are winners and losers whether we stay or go, protectionism damages trade it makes products manufactured in the EU more expensive than those outside of the EU. Therefore if you want to trade outside of the EU you are at a distinct disadvantage.
Patrick is recognised as a leading expert and you are not, EU politics aside I still don't like the labour mentality of making those that work hard pay for those that do not. I work 24/7 and yes I am well off but I pay an awful lot of corporation tax, personal income tax not to mention the net contribution to the HMRC from VAT. People make poor career options, aren't motivated, have never worked etc but that is not my fault. The other annoyance is in addition to paying an awful lot of taxes I also have to pay for private medical insurance.
I'll be voting Tory as always.
Yup, this aligns with my thoughts exactly and trust me, my whole life has been associated with hospitals, both military and NHS.
Yes and a typical looser as stated in the interview was car manufacturing which to me is a serious concern along with our other heavy plant and engine concerns. (JCB etc)
No I am not an expert just an interested observer trying to make sense of the available information
I take offense at the hard working bit. I know a lot of extremely hard working people who live on the edge of poverty with dignity rather than scrounge of the state
I also know some extremely well educated hard working people who don't earn a lot of money dispite huge personal investment in education
And I know people who earn 7 figure salleries for doing not a lot realy but knowing all the right people to get the job or having inherited the business or wealth.
You don't go to Eaton for the education, you go there for the networking.
I have voted Tory since Thatcher I did waver a bit under major as I wanted Michael Heseltine for PM and felt Major was a non enterty
But No one is guaranteed my unquestioning vote.
I always do the research and vote with my personal view of who would be right to run the country. It just happens to have been tory till now.
Now I am looking to protect the country from a landslide Conservitive result. May is a gormless, rudderless leader who lacks gravitas, just look at how she's treated in the EU, they have no respect for her.
The Conservitives will win but we need a balance of power in Parliament to ensure she doesnt steam roller through their policy
S
Yes it did it was just not screened for and reported. MRSA has been known about for at least 30 years. Also there has been a rise in multiresistant bacteria due to the overprescribing of antibiotics mainly in response to public pressure on GP's. As more patients are having bits of metal put in them it is much more relevant if one of these gets MRSA.MRS didn't occur in hospitals. This because hospitals were run by Matriarchs who made sure they were good for patients and not by some overpaid CEO.
Caused by a Vitamin B1 deficiency due to poor diet. Probably rife in the West Midlands!!!Beri beri i believe is a tropical disease so didn't affect darkest Warwickshire.
Lord Bamford was a very vocal supporter of brexit I'm pretty sure that he thought it through beforehand, that is why he is a very rich man
Like Dyson?
They support Brexit because they want to out source outside of the EU to pay cheap labour, no health and safety, no sick pay, no pensions and yet still sell the things here at the same prices. So they become even richer men.
Anyone who thinks that Lord Bamford or Dyson is or are supporting Brexit because "it's good for the ordinary Brit" with a mortgage, two kids at school and "just about managing" has an empty gap between their ears as big as the trenches cut by his diggers.
Look at Cadbury. Closed and outsourced to Poland as that as cheap as they can get but still be inside the EU trading zone. Listen up...these jobs gone to Poland are not coming back to UK after Brexit....in fact worse..
There will be an huge financial incentive to outsource what we've still got left in the UK outside the UK after Brexit.
The flight of jobs to the new Eastern European EU joiners may have been bad for some UK manufacturing but at least it kept some jobs here as Eastern Europe was lesser incentive to outsource vis-a-vis the jobs remaining in the UK than if we were outside the EU.
JCB exports are mainly non EU, if companies can make products cheaper abroad then who can blame them. What we need to is address the issues as to why companies would want to move production abroad, I think a lot of it is the high employment costs, H&S and employment laws. I can't imagine that people here in the UK will want to work for less so the knock on effect is production goes abroad or do you think Cadbury's should have been nationalised so the government could control the company?
I am willing to bet £1 JCB will not move production abroad.
Is that the same JCB with factories in Asia, Germany, Austrailia, India, North America and South America?
They already have large scale production abroard and can avoid export costs which will increase post Brexit by using say Germany to cover the EU countries
Do you think Cadbury's should have been nationalised so the government could control the company?
No. That'd be daft. But the UK Dept. of Trade could have blocked the deal without a firm cast iron guarantee that the new owners wouldn't renege on the PROMISE they made to get the go ahead NOT TO CLOSE UK PLANTS.
Because, guess what, having got the go ahead they then did renege on the deal and close those plants. And who picks up the cost of those now redundant workers signing on the dole? Yes, you and I Mr and Mr Brit Taxpayer.
Now I am looking to protect the country from a landslide Conservitive result. May is a gormless, rudderless leader who lacks gravitas, just look at how she's treated in the EU, they have no respect for her.
Yes it did it was just not screened for and reported. MRSA has been known about for at least 30 years. Also there has been a rise in multiresistant bacteria due to the overprescribing of antibiotics mainly in response to public pressure on GP's. As more patients are having bits of metal put in them it is much more relevant if one of these gets MRSA.
FYI 10% of children are and were damaged by measles, deafness being a huge problem along with chronic chest problem called bronchiectasis. Mumps similarly causes hearing loss but only about 1% of children. So not healthier.
Caused by a Vitamin B1 deficiency due to poor diet. Probably rife in the West Midlands!!!