I'm trying at the minute to sort through a desk full of old photos, negatives and slides all taken in 35mm. What's the best gadget to view and digitise negatives and slides?
Thanks
JCS
Thanks
JCS
Thanks very much for all the kit you have lent me.I have a light box you can borrow for viewing loads of them together.
Useful link thanks. The move to digital freed up a lot of fridge space for me!@kinchblaze / JCS there has been a revival of film photography(not that it ever went away) a lot of E6 processing is being reinstated in the processing labs , these people are the old fuji processing lab https://ccimaging.co.uk they also do scanning of slides/negatives to digital/cd
Developing for those interested i think i paid £15.00 for fuji Provia 36ex developed and mounted and scanned to disk . I also managed to pick up a Leica slide projector for tenner which you cant beat for viewing slides / negatives projected onto a white wall the pictures are so much better than looking at a computer screen
For anyone interested in film photography this place is very competitively priced for supplies and provide an excellent service
![]()
Analogue Wonderland | Buy & Develop Film Online | 35mm, 120
Welcome to Analogue Wonderland, your online destination for all things film photography. We offer a wide selection of analogue cameras, film, lab services, and accessories to help you capture beautiful, timeless images. Shop with us to find the perfect camera film for your analogue photography...analoguewonderland.co.uk
McKenzie
dont know if your aware that Kodak have re-released Ektachrome and also there are some black and white slide film available as well
just had a look at the evil-bay slide projectors (Leica) and it seems that the prices have increased quite a bit JCS![]()
The photograph itself was well worth the exerciseI bought an Epson V550 phto scanner earlier in the year for digitizing my copious collection of slides and negatives.
It's capable of >6400dpi but given the resolution of the films (even Kodachome etc) it's severe overkill.
Maybe 4800dpi but more is a waste of time IMO, the attached was a 3200dpi off of a 35mm ISO200 negative film, originally was 8.7MBytes (vert 2762pixels) but here processed to 3.83MBytes, vertical 2048 pixels (site won't do the orignal).
I was getting a bit tired at scan number 2120....The photograph itself was well worth the exercise. john
BarkingsnakeI bought an Epson V550 phto scanner earlier in the year for digitizing my copious collection of slides and negatives.
It's capable of >6400dpi but given the resolution of the films (even Kodachome etc) it's severe overkill.
Maybe 4800dpi but more is a waste of time IMO, the attached was a 3200dpi off of a 35mm ISO200 negative film, originally was 8.7MBytes (vert 2762pixels) but here processed to 3.83MBytes, vertical 2048 pixels (site won't do the orignal).