Paul, if I've read right, you aren't allowed to dog fur bearers and you're not supposed to shoot them, does that mean trapping is the only legitimate take?
Sort of.

How's that for a vague answer?
Unfortunately, the answer is vague because the law is not uniform.
The simple part is: No dogs.
The complicated part is: some fur-bearers you can trap and some you can't.
Technically, you can't "hunt" ANY fur-bearers, (that means take on a hunting license), but some of them you CAN shoot with a gun (take) as long as you have a trapping license. Shooting a furbearer while you have a valid trapping license on your person is legally considered "trapping" (as long as it was one of the few fur-bearers that can legally be shot on a trapping license

). To add to the confusion, there are some animals, like lynx, wolf, and wolverine that are both legally fur-bearers, AND legally 'big game'.

Each one of them has a different trapping and hunting season, and each has different legal method-and-means, and each has a different bag limit. For example, in some Game Management Units (GMU), you can only "hunt" (take on a hunting license), one wolf. However, in that same GMU, if you have a trapping license, you can take 30, AND you could shoot all 30 of them if you so chose.
But you couldn't have a dog with you when you did it.
Homestead protection must surely allow a gun to be used though, yes?
No... In fact, it's much worse than that. If you leave
anything in your "yard" that "attracts" an animal, (including a bitch in heat), and the "attracted" wild animal has to be destroyed as a "nuisance animal" or "in defense of life or property" (AKA "DLP"), you SHALL be issued a citation that WILL include a VERY stiff fine. This is of course not a regulation in The Bush (off the road system). Nonetheless, there
are places in
The Bush where it is
illegal to protect your belongings - house, pets, and other property - from grizzly bears. In those areas, most people operate under the "Three Ss Rule" - Shoot - Shovel - Shut up.
The fish and game management laws in Alaska are a lawyer's wet-dream. We have the natives that are "managed" (not) by the Federal Gov't, ("management" is no closed seasons, no bag limits, no rules - NO KIDDING), the life-long non-native Alaskans, the yahoos that have come here from "Outside" that want to make Alaska like California, or Colorado, or Connecticut, or WHEREVER they have come from, AND the *&^%*&^%^ing "environmentalists" - none of which LIVE HERE but insist on making Alaska their personal playground. Each of the above groups has some political entity that is "on their side". Unfortunately, the politicians "on the side" of non-native Alaskans (AKA "reality," for the most part) is pretty damn small. Consequently, fish and game management in Alaska is 100% a political football, and has NO semblance of rational thought behind it.
I'll climb down off that hobby-horse now...


Maybe we'll be able to meet some day, Tamus. I too am always happy to meet "interesting" people...
Regards
Paul