Price of dogs

@James0586 id like to see a bullgrey x mali, now that could have potential as a pig dog
The problem when crossing like that, Josh, is that it is very difficult to predict which characteristics the pups will take from each breed. You generally end up with dogs that are not as good as the parents...or you have to cull...a lot...and I mean an awful lot...over several generations.

Although illegal in the UK, pitbulls (proper ones) are almost the perfect dog: cross 'em with anything and you just end up with a sh1t pitbull. Likewise a mali: cross it and get a load of sh1t malis.

You do get lucky (James' guy sounds like he had a good one), or you have to change your luck by killing a lot of dogs: not for the faint of heart...
 
I remember when the cross breeding for pets started a few years back,a guy i worked with his wife wanted a small dog good with kids and did not cast,they got a Patterdale cross miniature poodle online,11 moths later he was wanting shot of it (cast hair continuously and had bit him the wife and both the kids)just just cannot predict what the cross will throw?.that's why pedigrees came about originally surely.
 
I remember when the cross breeding for pets started a few years back,a guy i worked with his wife wanted a small dog good with kids and did not cast,they got a Patterdale cross miniature poodle online,11 moths later he was wanting shot of it (cast hair continuously and had bit him the wife and both the kids)just just cannot predict what the cross will throw?.that's why pedigrees came about originally surely.
I like that example a lot... 😁
 
@CarlW issues associated that some crossbreeding brings up are interesting but is that not essentially what a lurcher is? A long dog crossed with a sheppard/terrier of some description? It is interesting when you look at a lurcher i suppose you dont think of all the dogs that are not up to scratch that get disposed of... i suppose that has to have been true for the vast majority of working terrier breeds in their early years?(i assume?)

I think we would agree on the types of people that shouldnt have these types of dogs (malis/pitbulls) and would hope that if somebody did look at crossbreeding they would at least have half a clue about what theyre doing. šŸ‘
 
@CarlW issues associated that some crossbreeding brings up are interesting but is that not essentially what a lurcher is? A long dog crossed with a sheppard/terrier of some description? It is interesting when you look at a lurcher i suppose you dont think of all the dogs that are not up to scratch that get disposed of... i suppose that has to have been true for the vast majority of working terrier breeds in their early years?(i assume?)

I think we would agree on the types of people that shouldnt have these types of dogs (malis/pitbulls) and would hope that if somebody did look at crossbreeding they would at least have half a clue about what theyre doing. šŸ‘
Either they kill a lot or they produce sh1t dogs. No other way with crosses.

A pit x mali (apart from exceptions) will be a poor pit and a poor mali: it won't be a superdog, as people expect

Dutch herder/mali crosses are a bit different: nowadays (at least with the KNPV lines) they are just colour variations of the same breed. A given litter will produce both 'herders' and 'malis'.
 
He did have a good one Carl but he only trained the bite!

Not difficult in the grand scheme of things. I would have been more impressed if he could have done an article search, object guard and perfect obedience rather than show it a sleeve and it goes off!

Incredible bite but lacked the thought process and became very unpredictable when engaged on the sleeve. He was very awkward to train and difficult to work on the sleeve....

Would have been an absolute machine in the right hands.
 
He did have a good one Carl but he only trained the bite!

Not difficult in the grand scheme of things. I would have been more impressed if he could have done an article search, object guard and perfect obedience rather than show it a sleeve and it goes off!

Incredible bite but lacked the thought process and became very unpredictable when engaged on the sleeve. He was very awkward to train and difficult to work on the sleeve....

Would have been an absolute machine in the right hands.
He got a good one. However, as you know, it is too big a gamble. Nine of its litter-mates probably belonged in the river...:(
 
The problem when crossing like that, Josh, is that it is very difficult to predict which characteristics the pups will take from each breed. You generally end up with dogs that are not as good as the parents...or you have to cull...a lot...and I mean an awful lot...over several generations.

Although illegal in the UK, pitbulls (proper ones) are almost the perfect dog: cross 'em with anything and you just end up with a sh1t pitbull. Likewise a mali: cross it and get a load of sh1t malis.

You do get lucky (James' guy sounds like he had a good one), or you have to change your luck by killing a lot of dogs: not for the faint of heart...
The book I mentioned previously goes into detail about the study on Russian artic foxes and how they were bred for more domestic friendly traits. Only the best (tamest and friendliest) of each litter were bred from and that took nearly 6 generations to see noticeable differences and 15 generations before there were consistent differences.

Breeding two pedigree dogs on a one off you can never be sure what you'll get.
 
He got a good one. However, as you know, it is too big a gamble. Nine of its litter-mates probably belonged in the river...:(
Your right, the 2 that came over a dog and a bitch were good hard dogs but what they had in jaw strength they lost in trainability and brains.
 
@CarlW Yes its strange that the line appears to designate the breed predominantly on colour
Only those registered under the Bloedlijnen system are integrated. The ones under national kennel clubs are (generally) kept more separate. The former are often (but not always) the better dogs.
 
The book I mentioned previously goes into detail about the study on Russian artic foxes and how they were bred for more domestic friendly traits. Only the best (tamest and friendliest) of each litter were bred from and that took nearly 6 generations to see noticeable differences and 15 generations before there were consistent differences.

Breeding two pedigree dogs on a one off you can never be sure what you'll get.
Yep. Flick a coin.

Or, devote your whole life to developing a new breed and then look back as a disappointed old man as you realise you've just reinvented the Jack Russell... :lol:

PS I apologise to the OP for dragging this off-topic.
 
The book I mentioned previously goes into detail about the study on Russian arctic foxes and how they were bred for more domestic friendly traits.

A story worth illustrating:


And for working dogs this one is even better ... jackal-dog hybrids from crossbreeding North Caucasian [Golden] jackals and Laikas.

We have a bog standard street bred mongrel Thug-U-Laika as a companion for our previously abandoned Siberian Husky, a world apart :lol:

 
Both.

The ideal scenario being that they all go to working homes, the breed are very active and will work whether the owner wants them to or not.

We have certain requirements that we want people to meet. If people don't meet them, the pups will not go to them. Equally if people do meet them, yet we don't we don't feel that they are being honest/will look after our pups, we will not sell to them either.

My misses is at the helm with this, I am a little bit worried that it might be easier to buy a child from us than a pup in all honesty.
Easier to buy a child brilliant mate šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚šŸ˜‚
 
On the other hand - if your dogs are cheaper than the majority on the market, you will attract people who are just looking for a cheap (for the time) dog and they are rarely, if ever the good homes.

How many people will look at their dog and HONESTLY say, ā€˜these aren’t the best dogs going so I’ll make them a bit cheaper than a champion bred, proven, health tested pup in another litter’ - I see quite a few litters bred from parents that should never be bred from - useless but they still attract top money. All you ever see is ā€˜my dog is wonderful and lovely and pups are going to be outstanding’
 
On the other hand - if your dogs are cheaper than the majority on the market, you will attract people who are just looking for a cheap (for the time) dog and they are rarely, if ever the good homes.

How many people will look at their dog and HONESTLY say, ā€˜these aren’t the best dogs going so I’ll make them a bit cheaper than a champion bred, proven, health tested pup in another litter’ - I see quite a few litters bred from parents that should never be bred from - useless but they still attract top money. All you ever see is ā€˜my dog is wonderful and lovely and pups are going to be outstanding’
If you look at each litter seriously you will find 90% should not have been bred I would think ? I have NEVER seen a litter advertised as ā€œ bitch isn’t too bad but to be honest I’ve bred the litter because I need the moneyā€ when almost EVERY litter will have been bred like this. The notion of a higher price means a better home is pie in the sky , you only had to go to Battersea dogs home, pre COVID, to see it full of expensive pedigree dogs. ā€œForever homeā€ is also a Disney way of looking at things. Does it make the breeder seem more caring when they put that ? It’s total nonsense. No man on earth can guarantee a home for life to a dog.
 
Back
Top