That explains it then.Many thanks for the help - the barrel is 16.5'' bull barrel and with a Laurence precision moderator. Scope to Bore is 2.5'' as it is a Wraith NV scope
Run over a Chrono and out the correct figures into a ballistic app
That explains it then.Many thanks for the help - the barrel is 16.5'' bull barrel and with a Laurence precision moderator. Scope to Bore is 2.5'' as it is a Wraith NV scope
Thats one very accurate gun thenespecially with that barrel length.
Get it chrono ed , and forget about what the box says, my advice, for the ranges you are shooting at, is zero at 75 yards
At 3000fps , BC of .23 and scope height of 2.5 " you are half inch low at 50 and 160 yards, half inch high at 110, and 2 inch low at 200.
If your MV is higher (it wont be a lot) even better.
This""". Ballistic calculations should always be trialled in real field conditions and confirmed in practice. Plus cr@p in equals cr@p out. You need accurate imput dataYou need to do a proper drop test. Look it up.
Drop tests are more accurate than a chrono muzzle velocity for the shorter range sports shooter, because they deal with the decrease in BC as velocity decreases.
With your short barrel there is no knowing what muzzle velocity you’re really getting, and the factory BC will not apply because you will probably already be below the first G1 threshold.
If you do a proper drop test, I guarantee you will get the right information for your set up.
You need to do a proper drop test. Look it up.
Drop tests are more accurate than a chrono muzzle velocity for the shorter range sports shooter, because they deal with the decrease in BC as velocity decreases.
With your short barrel there is no knowing what muzzle velocity you’re really getting, and the factory BC will not apply because you will probably already be below the first G1 threshold.
If you do a proper drop test, I guarantee you will get the right information for your set up.
I know all of that.Yes, and no. You've got it a bit too simple I'm afraid.
A "drop test" (as you call it) is just DOPE (Data On Previous Engagement) and, while accurate, is only applicable for that particular environment (temp, humidity, atmospheric pressure). Hence why we have BC's and ballistic calculators; calculators that alter the BC as velocity degrades and factors in environmental changes from when the ballistic calculator was "trued".
Realististically, you start with a BC (which is derived at a standard velocity) and then gather velocity data. Then calculate the ballistic curve (which will attempt to degrade or increase the BC based on the velocity difference). Then "true" the ballistic curve (best done at extreme range, so that the changes are discernable) by altering the BC until the curve matches reality (again, at long range). The difference here, is that a ballistic calculator includes environmentals, and can therefore alter the curve as the environmentals change.
As to the accuracy of chronographs; with today's magnetic or pulse doppler chronographs, they are about as accurate as a person can get, short of being in a lab. Definitely accurate enough to support an accurate ballistic calculation.

There is much to be said about practical experience.
I needed a good laugh this morning, thanks @MarinePMI!
It’s all good mate, you can stick to your theory and I’ll stick to my practical experience.
Take a step back and look at what we know of the problem, and the fella we’re trying to help. Start at the beginning.
He’s not shooting deer, he’s shooting foxes.... See, I told you to start at the beginning!LOL! No theory here, just lots of real world experience (at both short and long range). Deer aren't that hard to kill...
Guilty as charged. My b...too many threads to keep track of...He’s not shooting deer, he’s shooting foxes.... See, I told you to start at the beginning!
![]()