Pulsar c50

Assuming it allows me I might plug my C50 into my PC using the USB C port and see if the footage is any better. I can confirm though playback from stream vision is degraded compared to what the eye sees through the scope.
 
That’s a great idea , never even crossed mind .

give it try and see how you get on. I can’t do it as I’m an old technically retarded
 
No I have to agree out in the field there is no comparison between the two
it’s no fault of anyone that’s making these videos, it just the way they come out
but and it’s a big but looking tho the scope that fox would be crisp and Cristal clear , and as a few have said with a laser IR it’s the best I’ve looked thro
and as you know VM I had them all
atb
 
It’s such a pity the base mag is so low. Great for hogs in America not great for UK quarry. Start it at 7 x and the unit be a decent set up.
 
Your right Herb
anything under a 100:is fine on base 3.5 , anything over I’m up to 7x and still well shootable ( if therse such a word ) 😂
atb
 
I noticed the Sumlight is ON too - Thad significantly degrades the image and looking at the C50’s user manual, Pulsar suggest using it without IR but also say it will degrade the image and cause blurring on moving images.
N
 
SRX mate , and Dark engine , Srx has the edge
I did record them too foxes I shot the other nite , I’ll down load them and get it posted , I’m sure the video won’t be any better that what the lads have done already tho
atb
 
I noticed the Sumlight is ON too - Thad significantly degrades the image and looking at the C50’s user manual, Pulsar suggest using it without IR but also say it will degrade the image and cause blurring on moving images.
N
Yes sumlight should not be used with IR it’s for covert non IR use to prevent spooking quarry up close..

I’m definitely in the camp of wanting more magnification, but and it’s a big but … there’s a lot of situations when I want more field of view 100% when rat shooting and 100% when shooting rabbits out the vehicle and trying to get on target, the likes of a Pard NV008 is useable but the restricted field of view on this and the likes of a Wraith 1080 , etc are very limiting and it’s a ball ache finding them in the scope, the C50 is SO MUCH better for this type of use and can be used at long range too, so for me it’s more versatile ..and a fully scaled reticule and PIP for me are a mandatory requirement for quick location and quick holdover shots in succession through the night ..
 
I can't help thinking some people are desperate to not like it for some reason. All I can say is I have the pulsar n970 and pard 008 both of which I was happy with. However I now have the c50 and it's in a different league in every respect. Watch as many YouTube videos as you want, proof is in the pudding. Some people won't be convinced no matter what.
 
I can't help thinking some people are desperate to not like it for some reason. All I can say is I have the pulsar n970 and pard 008 both of which I was happy with. However I now have the c50 and it's in a different league in every respect. Watch as many YouTube videos as you want, proof is in the pudding. Some people won't be convinced no matter what.
Believe me I genuinely want it to be good I really do. I’m getting one ordered, if I’m lucky in the dealer having me near the top of there list, on Monday. I’m only sceptical about it having been bitten on the original Digex.
 
Wolf
you me and VM , have had the 970lrf , I sill got mine on top of the wardrobe
and that was the best in its day but time moves on , and I totally agree with you it no loss to me or anyone else if ten thousand questions are asked it’s only polite to try and answer those questions with honesty, and give a guidance as best you can , people will always make there own mind up
but he ho I’m well happy with mine
atb
 
Back
Top