Leupsak
Well-Known Member
No don't do it, stick with how you normally shootSuppose I'd best dig my bipod out from where ever the hell I put it... got bored of lugging it around when I predominantly shoot off sticks
No don't do it, stick with how you normally shootSuppose I'd best dig my bipod out from where ever the hell I put it... got bored of lugging it around when I predominantly shoot off sticks
Thank you.
Famous last words but I’m not really worried about the shooting test. If I fall to bits with nerves after 40 years of shooting I may as well pack it up….but I guess you never know until you do it.
That’s what I’m more worried about, going blank trying to answer an obvious questionLike you shooting wasn't an issue just didn't want to embarrass myself in the exam, as a middle-aged dyslectic![]()
just remember the answer will be Fallow or Sika or Buck or StagThat’s what I’m more worried about, going blank trying to answer an obvious question![]()
It'll be alright, not gonna overthink it. If there's prone shooting, I want the bipod for sureNo don't do it, stick with how you normally shoot
All explained here: It used to be tougher. You can also buy the official target from the BDS to practice with. Don't fluff the close range head shot, if you have a large 'scope, or even any 'scope, you'll probably have to compensate.It'll be alright, not gonna overthink it. If there's prone shooting, I want the bipod for sure
I can't believe how many clients don't know where to aim at 10 to 20 meters!6
2 for 100m
2 for 70m
2 for 10m headshot
Don't be shyIf you are severely dyslexic then the provider might be able to help with someone to read for you, extra time, or whatever. Don't be shy to ask.
Without having done it myself yet, the shooting skills required do seem lax for the generally-accepted certification, but I would assume that the DSC2 is the bit of paper which would prove one is competent. A DSC1 is perhaps more an exercise in separating wheat from chaff with regards to deer knowledge, rather than a certificate for one's marksmanshipThe DSC1 'shooting test' is a joke IMHO.
I understand the need for shorter distances (100m and closer) due to the contraints experienced by different venues, but the fact someone is able to pass with no prior experience with centrefire firearms shows it is simply too easy.
Ever heard of someone never having driven a car or simillar vehicle and passing their driving test on the first try?
If I were to sugguest amendments, it would be as follows:
1. Make all shots either offhand or on sticks, no bipods allowed.
2. Set a time limit of 5 seconds for each shot, running successively, so you get 10 seconds total for two shots but the first shot must be fired within 5 seconds of the candidate being walked to the firing point and being told they are safe to shoot, no allowance for 'getting ready'.
This would dramatically change the course and raise the required level of competence. I once conducted a 'shooting test' run along the lines of the DSC1 test and the candidate had a negligent discharge off sticks... a danger to themselves and others, I doubt they would concern any deer!
I would assume that the DSC2 is the bit of paper which would prove one is competent.
A mate of mine has DSC I and DSCI I (old version).Like you shooting wasn't an issue just didn't want to embarrass myself in the exam, as a middle-aged dyslectic
I completely agree…I did mine in 2013 having never fired a centrefire rifle other than in cadets. I thought the shooting test was very very simple and easy, passed first time using their rifle, no bipod etc and borrowed sticks. Many didn’t, including one who had a heavily modified accuracy international .308 with a tripod not bipod which he claimed to have been stalking with the previous weekend - he managed to fail the test twice.Just an observation, when I took my DSC1 many years ago, I couldn't understand the difficulties many others (some apparently very experienced but only doing it on sufferance because they now needed the minimum qualification to keep working) were having in doing something that I regarded as dead easy.
One bluffer wanted to use his "shooting chair" for the closer shots, insisting that it was his normal stalking equipment (?). He got short shrift, was told to use sticks, standing or kneeling, or a long bipod, all provided. He still failed three times. Oh, and ran out of ammo so had to scrounge some more. Still failed.
Others of course turned up completely un-zeroed, then fannied about holding up the rest of us whilst being indulged (actually pretty much coached by the RCO).
It should be more of a doddle nowadays, but I suppose the close range head shot might catch some out, if they don't compensate for the 'scope height above the barrel.
My point being that it is not a difficult test. No the target does not have a red spot to aim at, but up the back of the front leg, halfway up the body, is where to shoot.
Now here is an interesting statistic (as of 2018)
https://www.dmq.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/DSC1.pdf
I undertook my DSC1 in June last year, and took a lot from it, the shooting is basic for sure and I had not shot a rifle (other than air rifles in my youth).The DSC1 'shooting test' is a joke IMHO.
I understand the need for shorter distances (100m and closer) due to the contraints experienced by different venues, but the fact someone is able to pass with no prior experience with centrefire firearms shows it is simply too easy.
Ever heard of someone never having driven a car or simillar vehicle and passing their driving test on the first try?
If I were to sugguest amendments, it would be as follows:
1. Make all shots either offhand or on sticks, no bipods allowed.
2. Set a time limit of 5 seconds for each shot, running successively, so you get 10 seconds total for two shots but the first shot must be fired within 5 seconds of the candidate being walked to the firing point and being told they are safe to shoot, no allowance for 'getting ready'.
This would dramatically change the course and raise the required level of competence. I once conducted a 'shooting test' run along the lines of the DSC1 test and the candidate had a negligent discharge off sticks... a danger to themselves and others, I doubt they would concern any deer!
A colleague of mine runs a lot of DSC1 courses and he tells me he has only ever had experienced stalkers and shooter fail the shooting test, normally the ones who think the test is too easy!The DSC1 'shooting test' is a joke IMHO.
I understand the need for shorter distances (100m and closer) due to the contraints experienced by different venues, but the fact someone is able to pass with no prior experience with centrefire firearms shows it is simply too easy.
Ever heard of someone never having driven a car or simillar vehicle and passing their driving test on the first try?
If I were to sugguest amendments, it would be as follows:
1. Make all shots either offhand or on sticks, no bipods allowed.
2. Set a time limit of 5 seconds for each shot, running successively, so you get 10 seconds total for two shots but the first shot must be fired within 5 seconds of the candidate being walked to the firing point and being told they are safe to shoot, no allowance for 'getting ready'.
This would dramatically change the course and raise the required level of competence. I once conducted a 'shooting test' run along the lines of the DSC1 test and the candidate had a negligent discharge off sticks... a danger to themselves and others, I doubt they would concern any deer!
Why, are you not allowed to take more than one brand ammo to make up the amount needed?Aye and they all need the same headstamp![]()
You are allowed to take as many different 'brand' rounds as you wish.Why, are you not allowed to take more than one brand ammo to make up the amount needed?
If you take home loads (How can they tell?) or factory, they don’t need the same headstamp.You are allowed to take as many different 'brand' rounds as you wish.
The point is that they must be 'factory rounds' and not home-loads.
@kenbro had (I think) his tongue in his cheek when he posted. The 'suggestion' that if you do take 'home-loads' make sure they are all of the same 'head-stamp= (brand).