Used one on Sika and hybrids across the water. Terrific round.Currently using a 5.6x57 now and again. Similar performance to the .220 and it deffo does the trick.
Used one on Sika and hybrids across the water. Terrific round.Currently using a 5.6x57 now and again. Similar performance to the .220 and it deffo does the trick.
It's something to consider certainly, I often wonder if it's something that was more prevalent in the early days of the Swift when metallurgy was not as advanced as it is today and also style of shooting, for example rapid succession of shots without allowing the rifle to cool in-between.Does short barrel life not bother you?
I'd be more inclined to a. 223 myself for the job you're describing.
If I was to shoot somewhere between 10-20 foxes a year and maybe a couple of Deer I'd be satisfied. That coupled with zero and practice I'd probably put 200-300 rounds through it in the same period.How many varmints is the Op going to nail with it per year?
K
Always fancied a 22-06 myself, just for fun.No experience with it, but like you it has always appealed.
However I'd personally go for a 22-243 Winchester variant if after a screaming. 224" purely because parent brass is cheap and everywhere, and wildcats are ridiculously cool.
Always fancied a 22-06 myself, just for fun
This?No experience of the Swift, but I did use a 22 Max back in 90’s. It was a wildcat based on the 243 case blown own and necked down, shooting a 60gn ballistic tip bullet at 4,000 ish fps. Lazerlike to shoot. MPB range on crow sized targets was 300m. Terminal effect was explosive. Shot plenty of deer with it. Head shots only - no need for a knife to remove to the head.
Foxes - just turned them into soup
If you use a tougher monolithic type bullet, rather than a ballistic tip Varmint type, i would expect the damage to much more acceptable, although you probably want to avoid close range shots.
The 22 Swift did get a reputation of bullet blow up. Much more to do with the bullet type than the cartridge.
If you are having one built do think about twist rate so more suitable for monolithic type bullets. The velocity will help as you will get faster spin, but traditionally I think the swift has a quite slow twist rate.
No - it was called a 22 wildcat and had a steeper shoulder than 243. More akin an Ackly Improved shoulder. Very similar performance though. One downside of the sharp shoulder was it did not feed well. It belonged to a friend who used to spend time in the US with a custom gun maker. It was a Rem 700 fully blueprinted, long 26” heavyweight stainless barrel that was fluted with a bell & carlson stock. It was the mid 1990’s so exact details a bit hazy these days.This?
Ken.
Its a shame about all the regulations you have because in reality the swift 222 223 22-250 all cover everything from your small varmint to the largest deer you have.Looking to add a Centrefire .220 Swift to fill the gap between my .17 HMR and 30-06.
Mainly for Fox but would be useful as a secondary rifle for the small legal deer in England/Wales. Obviously there are several other calibres .223,.222,22-250 that would be quite capable but I'm impressed with the ballistics on the Swift and it's heritage and history.
I'm a keen and experienced hand-loader and can source brass and die sets so ammunition availability doesn't really concern me.
To any existing shooters of the swift, I was wondering how much meat damage there was with a high velocity projectile? I was thinking 70grn bullets for deer, would that give enough penetration and reduce fragmentation?
Any information and advice on the Swift would be gratefully appreciated, thankyou.
Can only fix so much in the steel , especially when barrels are not made from anything that can be less or more effected by that heat . The more powder and the temperature of that burn are the factor at play in the same bore size ( this is why .22 hornet lasts for many , many thousands of rounds and 222 / 223 are very long lasting ( 556 under full auto isnt even that bad ) 22-250 is worse on barrel life as more of those hot gasses are produced , then 22 swift that amount again .It's something to consider certainly, I often wonder if it's something that was more prevalent in the early days of the Swift when metallurgy was not as advanced as it is today and also style of shooting, for example rapid succession of shots without allowing the rifle to cool in-between.
Hence its on every gunshop shelf and nearly every rifle manufacturer has it in their line up i suppose? Factory ammo flies off the shelves !Funny isn't that you never read anything negative about the 220 Swift from someone who has actually owned one! Best 22 cf on the planet.
It is a fantastic cal. But to be fair to the other 22s the 223 went through the stratosphere because it was militarized. Remington knew it was going to be so quickly released it as a sporter 1st b4 the 5.56 was officially announced. Most soldiers who used it (if they were outdoorsey) used them recreationaly and it really was the beatles of the CF world. It got a great start as a calibre and backed itself up with results so remains so. The 308 did something similar.Hence its on every gunshop shelf and nearly every rifle manufacturer has it in their line up i suppose? Factory ammo flies off the shelves !
Seriously its got its uses , it might be into a new one soon as long copper bullets 70 grain up in 22 become more popular via the 22 creed but then the same barrel life issues exist with this, talk seems to be 700 ish
As a grouse moor keeper one might find these things very handy dealing with daylight fox with long for caliber bullets say ? Best 22 on the planet has to be a very individual thing right ? if it was via sales over the last 50 years or so ammo and rifles i am sure the .223 rem will be the one elected
yep ! Although if a person really wants a 22 swift i say go for it , just dont be under any illusions . new and different guns are always a heap of fun for a whileIt is a fantastic cal. But to be fair to the other 22s the 223 went through the stratosphere because it was militarized. Remington knew it was going to be so quickly released it as a sporter 1st b4 the 5.56 was officially announced. Most soldiers who used it (if they were outdoorsey) used them recreationaly and it really was the beatles of the CF world. It got a great start as a calibre and backed itself up with results so remains so. The 308 did something similar.