Pard Ds35 or the pulsar c50

So my reason for asking is....,
I have a pard 008 which I was/am sharing between a 22lr and a 204 but getting fed up of re-zeroing and faffing about.

I'm tempted to permanently home the 008 on the 22lr for rats and rabbits etc. so the question then is which is the best option for foxing on a 204, max distance 250m biased towards dark rather than daytime use?

Anyone want to do me a deal in px for my Swarovski bins for sale on this forum?

I did exactly this, i had a 008 permanently on my .223 and swapped another between 22lr and HMR.
Ive had the C50 bolted to the .223 for the last 18 months and its been fautless, foxing and last legal light in colour for Muntjac, ive used the Alpex and Pard DS and i wouldnt swap either of them for my C50.
Having said that, all of them will do the job and the Alpex for £550 is a great price.
 
Thank you Bruce for those pointers, and an interesting slant going the opposite way to what I was thinking.

So what WOULD be a good significant step up from a 008 running on a 204?
Budget isn't unlimited but I'd rather spend more if necessary than end up with two units of similar abilities. A range of 250 was only put out there as a maximum for discussion, most shots would be around the100 to 200m mark.
The 008 has a higher base magnification than most digital day/night scope on the market.
The only one that has higher base magnification is the PARD DS35-70
It also depends what you mean by a "significant step up"
Image detail depends on lens focal length and pixel size with smaller pixels and longer the focal length lenses giving more detailed images
Low light performance depends on pixel size and lens aperture with larger pixels and "faster" lenses (lower f number) giving better performance in low light conditions
On a 204 at the ranges you quote, a scope with a rangefinder and ballistic calculator are not needed, and given it's recent price reduction the Alpex A50T-S would arguably be the best "bang for your buck"

Cheers

Bruce
 
The 008 has a higher base magnification than most digital day/night scope on the market.
The only one that has higher base magnification is the PARD DS35-70
It also depends what you mean by a "significant step up"
Image detail depends on lens focal length and pixel size with smaller pixels and longer the focal length lenses giving more detailed images
Low light performance depends on pixel size and lens aperture with larger pixels and "faster" lenses (lower f number) giving better performance in low light conditions
On a 204 at the ranges you quote, a scope with a rangefinder and ballistic calculator are not needed, and given it's recent price reduction the Alpex A50T-S would arguably be the best "bang for your buck"

Cheers

Bruce
Have you had chance to look at the new infiray td70l?
 
The 008 has a higher base magnification than most digital day/night scope on the market.
The only one that has higher base magnification is the PARD DS35-70
It also depends what you mean by a "significant step up"
Image detail depends on lens focal length and pixel size with smaller pixels and longer the focal length lenses giving more detailed images
Low light performance depends on pixel size and lens aperture with larger pixels and "faster" lenses (lower f number) giving better performance in low light conditions
On a 204 at the ranges you quote, a scope with a rangefinder and ballistic calculator are not needed, and given it's recent price reduction the Alpex A50T-S would arguably be the best "bang for your buck"

Cheers

Bruce
Thanks again 👍
 
Any more updates (sorry, pun intended) or info on this thread topic?
Today I took my Pard DS35-70 to the range. I originally set this up at 100m for all my calibres except 22LR and put the details into the ballistic calculator for further distances. However today I decided that I would zero at 200m for the 30-06 and I ran out of vertical elevation. I also had this problem at 50m using subsonics on the 22LR. Just be careful, as nice as it is to have the reticle in the middle of the scope like a normal optical, you run out of elevation adjustment quickly.
 
I have a C50 on my 223 and DS35 on my FAC air.....

The C50 has a better battery life, superior image quality and the App is much smoother.

It is a lot bigger than DS35 and more expensive.

For me the C50 is ideal up to 250 meters and DS35 up to 120 meters.

Using a better IR it improves usable range but makes both units bulkier.

The Ballistic Calculator is good on DS35 once it is set up properly - ideal for air rifle.

Pictures for size comparison
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20231006_223046201.webp
    PXL_20231006_223046201.webp
    270.8 KB · Views: 36
  • PXL_20231006_223136798.webp
    PXL_20231006_223136798.webp
    156.9 KB · Views: 35
I've been using the c50 WiFi model since the First day it was released, I could buy any number of nv for my pest control company and do have loads of others cupboard bound. I get to try or demo loads of kit and nothing tops the c50 all round. If it did I would be using it.
The low light capabilities is out standing.

I have never had to re zero it yet !! And I can't say that about any glass yet.

The pulsar platform is second to none.

I have been using the thermion duo xp55 its nice but doesn't compare to my thermion 2 xp 50 Pro and it should be the same!!!!!

the low light mode on the c50 is better by far.

I do hope pulsar releases a thermal night vision scope.
 
I'll cross them off the list then. Cheers bruce

Bruce had a bad experience when ATN first appeared in the U.K. and that has tarnished his opinion of them ever since, by contrast I have been using the ATN 4k pro since they first come out and still am was out yesterday night with it and can see no reason to change. ATN have a u.k. manufacturing and repair facilities.

ATNUK are SD members

 
Last edited:
Bruce had a bad experience when ATN first appeared in the U.K. and that has tarnished his opinion of them ever since, by contrast I have been using the ATN 4k pro since they first come out and still am was out yesterday night with it and can see no reason to change. ATN have a u.k. manufacturing and repair facilities.

ATNUK are SD members

I've seen that and whoever is running it seems keen to hear what people say. It sounds positive. It's a shame they had too many software issues early on which hurt the brand so much. From what I've heard when running right they hold there own image wise against most of the big names, it just the niggle wether you get a good one or not.
 
Bruce had a bad experience when ATN first appeared in the U.K. and that has tarnished his opinion of them ever since, by contrast I have been using the ATN 4k pro since they first come out and still am was out yesterday night with it and can see no reason to change. ATN have a u.k. manufacturing and repair facilities.

ATNUK are SD members

I agree , I have used a 4k Pro on one of my cf,s for many years and it's been absolutely superb with a good laser IR
 
Ive got a couple of questions about the Hik Alpex:

1. What is the mag? I’ve seen it advertised as 3.5 - 14 and also 3 - 12.

2. Is it usable on max mag? I.e fox at 200yards

3. If the battery is internal does that mean you need to leave the rifle out of the cabinet over night to charge?

Thanks in advance for any help.
 
Ive got a couple of questions about the Hik Alpex:

1. What is the mag? I’ve seen it advertised as 3.5 - 14 and also 3 - 12.

2. Is it usable on max mag? I.e fox at 200yards

3. If the battery is internal does that mean you need to leave the rifle out of the cabinet over night to charge?

Thanks in advance for any help.
1. I've measured the base mag and it's x3.5, but most people would struggle to tell the difference between x3 and x3.5
2. The image at maximum magnification (x14) is quite pixellated but a fox at 200 yards is perfectly doable
3. You put the rifle (with the scope fitted) in the cabinet and connect the scope to a powerbank (20000mah would be good) via the USB connector. The internal battery gets charged from the powerbank so the next time you take the rifle out, the battery is fully charged and you put the powerbank on charge ready to charge up the scope when you come home - simples 🙂

Cheers

Bruce
 
1. I've measured the base mag and it's x3.5, but most people would struggle to tell the difference between x3 and x3.5
2. The image at maximum magnification (x14) is quite pixellated but a fox at 200 yards is perfectly doable
3. You put the rifle (with the scope fitted) in the cabinet and connect the scope to a powerbank (20000mah would be good) via the USB connector. The internal battery gets charged from the powerbank so the next time you take the rifle out, the battery is fully charged and you put the powerbank on charge ready to charge up the scope when you come home - simples 🙂

Cheers

Bruce
Thanks Bruce, that is great information.
 
Back
Top