“Do up” a T3 / rebarrel a sako / or a buy a blaser?

wildfowler.250

Well-Known Member
Well folks, I’ve got that new gun itch which I’m trying to talk myself around or out of.

I currently have a sako 75 and my only gripe is the stock. I find it quite low on the cheek with a x56 scope,(maybe in future I’d buy a x50 but that’s a different conversation).

I currently have a beartooth cheek riser which works but I’m not entirely convinced it gives me as much consistency as an adjustable piece on a stock.

Having looked at aftermarket stocks, there’s none anymore for the 75. I could possibly buy a blank inlet and hope a good smith can bed it? Or is this particularly difficult?

At the same time, am I sensible whilst the rifle is in to rebarrel or rechamber? .270 again or that .30-06 itch. It still shoots fine but wouldn’t do harm?


Would I be better just buying a T3X,(seems sacrilege to swap a 75 for a T3x) and have more aftermarket parts and options? The 75 is so silky smooth though.


Then I have a look at the blasers. I think okay, possibly a step up in quality over the 75. Maybe safety step up. The thumbhole is about £3800 new. Surely I’d be less than this for a stock and new barrel with a smith? The actual adjustable part on the thumbhole stock looks pretty basic and is around actually £5k new,(it’s not going to bag me any more deer which is a thought).


This is all comes back to there being nothing really wrong with my current rifle other than maybe wanting to play with a new stock to see if it helps consistency.


The final question is who actually buys these stocks without handling them? Everyone or folk that like a gamble? I don’t think PSE have a supplier in Scotland. And Mcmillan,(LOVE the marble) I believe are a really long wait but also the same handling problem before you buy.


I know folk on here will have tweaked, sold, changed etc. I’ve had this rifle 15 years,(first CF) with light use. I don’t want to sell it and then regret it but I also feel that adjustment options are limited and tailored to the mass produced rifles - probably because they benefit from adjusting.


What’s the sensible choice? Try and get a PSE or mcmillan on the 75?
 
Can you shoot your rifle accurately?
Does it kill deer in it`s current chambering?
Chopping and changing will only lighten your Wallet if in reality you are happy with your basic setup.
I have a couple of 75’s and won`t be changing them in the future.
Keep an eye out in the classifieds, McMillans or GRS/ KKC show from time to time.
I can keep an eye out over here if you wish?
KKC do an inlet for Sako 75 action III and IV in the hunter model.
As do GRS in light hunter and sporter laminate models.
Staffordshire Synthetic Stocks are also showing an inlet for the 75. Doesn’t look like adjustable cheekpiece though….
 
Last edited:
These new gun itches are particularly unpleasant, I’ve had it several times and despite looking for suitable remedies Ive never been able to cure it. The only sure fire way to cure it (and stop it recurring) is to inform your wife as soon as you feel it developing, providing her with the precise model and crucially the true cost of the new itch, I can guarantee the itch will go away almost instantly - worth noting this cure may have some mild side effects like earache but this passes quickly.
 
Well folks, I’ve got that new gun itch which I’m trying to talk myself around or out of.

I currently have a sako 75 and my only gripe is the stock. I find it quite low on the cheek with a x56 scope,(maybe in future I’d buy a x50 but that’s a different conversation).

I currently have a beartooth cheek riser which works but I’m not entirely convinced it gives me as much consistency as an adjustable piece on a stock.

Having looked at aftermarket stocks, there’s none anymore for the 75. I could possibly buy a blank inlet and hope a good smith can bed it? Or is this particularly difficult?

At the same time, am I sensible whilst the rifle is in to rebarrel or rechamber? .270 again or that .30-06 itch. It still shoots fine but wouldn’t do harm?


Would I be better just buying a T3X,(seems sacrilege to swap a 75 for a T3x) and have more aftermarket parts and options? The 75 is so silky smooth though.


Then I have a look at the blasers. I think okay, possibly a step up in quality over the 75. Maybe safety step up. The thumbhole is about £3800 new. Surely I’d be less than this for a stock and new barrel with a smith? The actual adjustable part on the thumbhole stock looks pretty basic and is around actually £5k new,(it’s not going to bag me any more deer which is a thought).


This is all comes back to there being nothing really wrong with my current rifle other than maybe wanting to play with a new stock to see if it helps consistency.


The final question is who actually buys these stocks without handling them? Everyone or folk that like a gamble? I don’t think PSE have a supplier in Scotland. And Mcmillan,(LOVE the marble) I believe are a really long wait but also the same handling problem before you buy.


I know folk on here will have tweaked, sold, changed etc. I’ve had this rifle 15 years,(first CF) with light use. I don’t want to sell it and then regret it but I also feel that adjustment options are limited and tailored to the mass produced rifles - probably because they benefit from adjusting.


What’s the sensible choice? Try and get a PSE or mcmillan on the 75?
staffordsshire still do the 75 styled stock and its available in the marbled colours. Sorry but imo Blazer are a lot of marketing and a reasonably good rifle and if you buy spare barrels then your looking at the price of three rebuilt 75sfor a blazer with two extra. Thats mental unless your doing air travel and taking all your barrels. Its personal but i dont really like blazer and a remember the bolt issues and the pressure issues
Ok i am very sako 75 myself its got only one issue today and that is its not ideal for NV use regards mount and no adjustable cheek rise ( though Staffordshire could sort the latter) folks talk about mag loss but you can simply put a wrap of tape on the mag . I do think if you want an nv rifle its better to look at a chassis system. Scopes up to 50 mm do all we need
 
I was in a similar situation to you. I sold my Sako 75 and bought a T3. The only thing I miss is the double stack magazine and being able to top load. Otherwise everything else works just as well and the aftermarket options for the T3 make it a far more versatile rifle. I generally swap my rifles main uses every now and again so the T3 makes more sense to me and I can swap the stock with my T1X too.

If I was in your shoes (or my shoes again) I'd probably send my 75 laminate stock off to have a cheek riser fitted like I did with my shotgun. See how that goes and if not get the T3 anyway as a Sako 75 with decent adjustable stock would be more desirable than the existing stock.
 
I was in a similar situation to you. I sold my Sako 75 and bought a T3. The only thing I miss is the double stack magazine and being able to top load. Otherwise everything else works just as well and the aftermarket options for the T3 make it a far more versatile rifle. I generally swap my rifles main uses every now and again so the T3 makes more sense to me and I can swap the stock with my T1X too.

If I was in your shoes (or my shoes again) I'd probably send my 75 laminate stock off to have a cheek riser fitted like I did with my shotgun. See how that goes and if not get the T3 anyway as a Sako 75 with decent adjustable stock would be more desirable than the existing stock.
Most female shooters need a higher cheek OR a smaller scope mounted as low as possible. Unfortunately guns are made to fit most not all ! My youngest daughter is a nightmare on gun fit . long neck, high cheek and narrow shoulder width
 
Unless you buy the blaser adjustable stock you'll be in a similar position (pardon the pun) ... if youre prepared to spend 3k plus on a blaser I would buy a t3 and get a pse or a form or grs stock fitted... a blaser won't shoot any better (I hear of several being ammo fussy) and there even more aftermarket options for the tikka incase you fancy a change or take up PRS .
I'm not a blaser hater by any means.... but having handled several and obviously seeing the prices I don't think they are the be all and end all and certainly not worth the price tag they demand... the only one that would appeal to me is the r8 professional x (the ten round mag and adjustable stock version)... bit without a lottery win it won't be something I'd contemplate.
 
Rebarrelling gives you what you want but when you sell you won't get your money back.

Buying a new stock blind is a gamble on its fit.

Both your options are adding aftermarket bits to the 75, so what's the advantage of a T3?
 
My suggestion

1) change the scope and mounts to 42 or 44mm objective. Most of your stock problems will be solved. And you really will not notice any difference in light transmission proved you use a slightly lowered powered setting on the scope.

2) give the bore a good clean and buy some more ammo.

3) use cash saved to spend on hunting trips.

What the OP is looking at is spending several thousand pounds and probably not ending up with anything better.
 
I changed the scope on my .30-06 Mauser from a 3-12x 50 Schmidt to a 2.5-10 x 42 leica. Completely solved cheek weld issues for me.
That being said, this isn’t a practice run, if you can afford the change and fancy it, do it. There’s no pockets in shrouds & numbers on a banking app will never make you smile like a new rifle does.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1124.webp
    IMG_1124.webp
    957.8 KB · Views: 50
Back
Top