HonestJohn
Well-Known Member
It's like hunting with iron sights, same thing. I don't know anyone who takes open sight shots past 50 anywayThat's the key point in bowhunting - u got to get close and choose your shot. Know your limits...
It's like hunting with iron sights, same thing. I don't know anyone who takes open sight shots past 50 anywayThat's the key point in bowhunting - u got to get close and choose your shot. Know your limits...
I think the same could be said for a single shot rifle in dense woodland. However I do agree the limit in range could limit your ability to follow up.What is you back up shot when you have pulled the shot and it has run 150 yds
Agreed, I had a Henry in .243 with sights and it's an absolute rushI'm up for it, love creeping into a deer with open sights to 15-30 yds already, can't see why the bow would be any less effective at that range than my CF rifle.
My only thought about stipulation on FAC (or a hunting permit of some kind) was that it still allows those who use a bow for targetry alone to own one without a licence. The hunters would need to apply to hunt with one.I’m up for it.
Moccasins ordered!
K
Ps: Don’t see any reason or benefit to having a bow & arrow detailed within a FAC unless the Op envisages heads being treated as expanding projectiles once were?
Again what is you back up shot ollie? As the thread is about bow hunting not a single shot rifleI think the same could be said for a single shot rifle in dense woodland. However I do agree the limit in range could limit your ability to follow up.

Agreed Morkai, I think it should only be on licence if intended to be used for hunting. The law doesn't stop the poachers anyway!
I'm absolutely with you Tim the ability to place a back up shot is severely reduced. Apologies if my response seemed otherwise!Again what is you back up shot ollie? As the thread is about bow hunting not a single shot rifle![]()
Definitely a strong argument to be made for this. My thought was that it would improve the likelihood of it being legalised if on a licence not because I think they should be regulated.I wouldnt even have them on license for hunting.
Faith had a sister called hope..........So what is you limit on range as you//our pulled shot is know a despatch issue ?I'm absolutely with you Tim the ability to place a back up shot is severely reduced. Apologies if my response seemed otherwise!
I suppose you would have to place more faith in the arrrow's ability to do its job and also ensure you're firing at much reduced ranges to ensure a clean strike. Shot placement would definitely be more critical than with a rifle.
Quite and well put..From what I’ve seen, admittedly it may not be the full picture, from videos on YouTube etc. bowhunting seems to be a case of sitting in a blind or up a tree waiting for an animal to visit a feed stand or even follow a trail on a game ranch. That’s to say you’re looking at playing the waiting game until a suitable quarry animal comes within your effective killing zone.
This simply wouldn’t work with the deer we have here - try getting within bow range of a mob of fallow in a field of winter wheat! Maybe you could stalk a roe buck in the rut or call a Muntjac into range but that’s not going to cut it when you’re trying to cull large numbers of does in the winter months.
I’m sure those north of the border will highlight similar issues with reds in the hill, or even roe.
Sorry, but to me it’s just not an effective solution to the need to manage a growing deer population.
Tin hat on & awaiting incoming!!
Hopefully their cousin Mercy turns up tooFaith had a sister called hope..........So what is you limit on range as you//our pulled shot is know a despatch issue ?
I certainly wouldn't suggest it as a tool for deer management. Simply not as likely to get within range of an animal I agree.From what I’ve seen, admittedly it may not be the full picture, from videos on YouTube etc. bowhunting seems to be a case of sitting in a blind or up a tree waiting for an animal to visit a feed stand or even follow a trail on a game ranch. That’s to say you’re looking at playing the waiting game until a suitable quarry animal comes within your effective killing zone.
This simply wouldn’t work with the deer we have here - try getting within bow range of a mob of fallow in a field of winter wheat! Maybe you could stalk a roe buck in the rut or call a Muntjac into range but that’s not going to cut it when you’re trying to cull large numbers of does in the winter months.
I’m sure those north of the border will highlight similar issues with reds on the hill, or even roe.
Sorry, but to me it’s just not an effective solution to the need to manage a growing deer population.
Tin hat on & awaiting incoming!!
There’s your answer then.Hopefully their cousin Mercy turns up too
I wouldn't feel comfortable taking a shot with a bow outside of 40 yards on a Red size animal. Closer to 30 on a Roe.
You could have said that earlier.....Have you shot a Red as they are a bit of a lump!Hopefully their cousin Mercy turns up too
I wouldn't feel comfortable taking a shot with a bow outside of 40 yards on a Red size animal. Closer to 30 on a Roe.
You could have said that earlier.....Have you shot a Red as they are a bit of a lump!
I can't add the dulling banjos music as it might be a copyright issue
Agreed, excellent way to spend a day. I haven't quite got that close on Fallow, though I took a Roe Doe last year at around 10m! I'd still say 30m on a Fallow is the more impressive feat.There’s your answer then.
If you want to outwit your quarry, have a fair chase, blah, blah, blah then try stalking fallow in woodland! Closest shot I’ve taken on one btw was a lot less than 30m.
Bowhunting should be legalised in the UK in the same way that rifle hunting is
You could well be right Slider!No Matter what arguments you put forward that'll never happen.