Thank you Rwanda and just keep the change

Personally I thought it was a kooky idea that smacked of desperation. Whether the new government will be able to have any effect after poo poohing the old governments efforts is another matter. Time will tell I guess. Whatever, obviously not an easily solved problem.

not an easy problem to solve ? just put them on the next available cross channel ferry back to France, given we pay France to stop them leaving in the first place.
 
Millions that could have kept working.

Some businesses with international trade may have needed it if the other side was shutdown, but for most people, no.

It was all about health wasnt it...except gyms closed but McDonald's stayed open.
Let me guess, you dont believe in covid ?
 
When Great Britain ruled the waves we went where we liked and took over other countries without a care in the world for who was already there and no one saw a problem with it. We used their resources with no thought to the future to further our own society and make us one of the most powerful nations on earth.

Now we have people wanting to come to us for a better life and it's a case of "not in my backyard".

People risking their lives travelling thousands of miles and then a crappy boat to cross one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world with one of the highest and strongest tides and they're all just chancers out to take advantage of the land of milk and honey?
 
please tell me why they have not claimed asylum in any of the safe countries they will have passed through before crossing the channel.
So it’s a bit like you want to go to Bristol from Chester. However you are told that Gloucester is a nice place and you cannot go to Bristol you must go to Gloucester.
How would that make you feel?
 
sunak should have to pay the millions back into the uk coffers,he and his mates can afford it and it should be his way of saying sorry to the country for buggering it all up.
 
True and genuine asylum seekers would claim asylum in the first SAFE country they planted their feet in for the sake of their family, loved ones, and themselves. As said above they're travelling through various countries to come to the UK because they know we're a soft touch with do gooders and our legal system. The worrying thing I see regularly is the bulk of these 'asylum seekers' are fighting age males! This to me indicates a 'soft' invasion over time. Just my opinion, I know some will disagree and others may agree, that's your perogative
 
True and genuine asylum seekers would claim asylum in the first SAFE country they planted their feet in for the sake of their family, loved ones, and themselves. As said above they're travelling through various countries to come to the UK because they know we're a soft touch with do gooders and our legal system. The worrying thing I see regularly is the bulk of these 'asylum seekers' are fighting age males! This to me indicates a 'soft' invasion over time. Just my opinion, I know some will disagree and others may agree, that's your perogative
Yep it's part of their masterplan to conquer the West, and we just allow it to happen. They are already planning radicalising out military with the intention of overthrowing our government.
I wonder if the lefties will take notice then ..probably not.
 
please tell me why they have not claimed asylum in any of the safe countries they will have passed through before crossing the channel.
I dont know the answer, but you said there were legal ways, im interested to know how they could legally claim asylum in the uk?
 
Back
Top