All very good points.Private investment with results based reward, gamekeepers only as good as their last season.
Public funds rewarding failure, Capercaillie had 10 million thrown at in 2021 3 years later need more money?
I personally want to preserve all indigenous species, I get a little upset when failure is rewarded.
Badger, pinemarten and corvid control would give a fairly quick and cost effective way of preserving what we have left, it would also give breathing space to other species that are not on deaths door.
The core underlying issue is that they’re in tiny fragments that are heavily disturbed.
Predation isn’t an issue in huge areas of continuous habitat - that’s how they evolved and how they persist on the continent. It’s important to remember that they existed perfectly well without predator control before we came along.
Predator control is necessary if they’re in small isolated populations.
But then there’s the unavoidable problem of deciding which species you want to prioritise. You can’t have them all: as is obvious here, if you want capercaillie, you can’t have predators, if you want predators you can’t have caper.
I can’t decide if the conservation agencies know this, but are trying to pretend it’s not true. Or if they genuinely don’t realise.
Based on recent experience trying to help get permission to plant trees near curlew, the RSPB is very aware of it. They are violently opposed to tree planting anywhere near curlew, and they list predation risk as the main reason.
I think trying to sustain capercailie in Scotland is completely pointless until there’s a much bigger area of connected, undisturbed habitat for them.
