Effectiveness of lead free ammunition

DCG

Well-Known Member
Prompted by our recent experiences, during a trip to the highlands to the hinds, I felt the need to open a discussion amongst the group, about the effectiveness of lead free ammunition.
Four of us arrived to shoot hinds, having previously been told we’d only be allowed to use lead free ammunition, to find that the estate stalkers were less than impressed that we hadn’t brought any lead. In their words, all of the copper that they’d come across wasn’t up to the job and they’d be using lead until they couldn’t.
Of the four in our party, two were using .270 one of these using the Hornady 130gn CX, the other Winchester extreme point impact, again in 130gn. The remainder, using 7mm-08, one again using Hornady, this time 139gn CX, whilst I was using the 130gn Fox Classic Hunters.
I’ve personally used the Fox on Roe and downovers and whilst I felt that they might be a bit harsh, I’ve not had any complaints about their knockdown ability with this size of deer.
The hinds however were a different matter.
Across the group we generally found that both calves and the mature animals, when shot with a classic heart lung shot, generally just took, the impact standing with very little reaction, going down slowly, several seconds latter from blood loss. Also reports of a couple of peculiar internal ricochets and exit wounds. The conclusion was that whilst retaining the weight, the bullet with minimal expansion, was passing through the chest cavity without imparting much of its energy in the animal, leaving it standing and leading to a relatively slow death. Post Mortem results in the larder would tend to confirm this with minimal damage to the organs.
The general conclusion over a drink afterwards, amongst both us and the stalkers was that lead free ammunition in the lesser calibers ( not that I ever thought I’d hear myself describe the venerable .270 Winchester as a lesser caliber) just isn’t there yet. The bullets generally, aren’t imparting the bulk of their energy into the carcass and the only way to ensure a knockdown kill is to put the shot through the shoulder, with the ensuing carcass damage. The stalkers opinion is that we’re going to have to use bigger diameter bullets ( let’s try and explain this to the average FEO ).
In General, I think we all felt disillusioned over the performance of what, with lead, had been perfectly capable calibers, which tended to bare out the experience of the professionals.
What are you’re thoughts and experiences and have any of you found any bullets which you feel are performing well on the larger animals.
 
Prompted by our recent experiences, during a trip to the highlands to the hinds, I felt the need to open a discussion amongst the group, about the effectiveness of lead free ammunition.
Four of us arrived to shoot hinds, having previously been told we’d only be allowed to use lead free ammunition, to find that the estate stalkers were less than impressed that we hadn’t brought any lead. In their words, all of the copper that they’d come across wasn’t up to the job and they’d be using lead until they couldn’t.
Of the four in our party, two were using .270 one of these using the Hornady 130gn CX, the other Winchester extreme point impact, again in 130gn. The remainder, using 7mm-08, one again using Hornady, this time 139gn CX, whilst I was using the 130gn Fox Classic Hunters.
I’ve personally used the Fox on Roe and downovers and whilst I felt that they might be a bit harsh, I’ve not had any complaints about their knockdown ability with this size of deer.
The hinds however were a different matter.
Across the group we generally found that both calves and the mature animals, when shot with a classic heart lung shot, generally just took, the impact standing with very little reaction, going down slowly, several seconds latter from blood loss. Also reports of a couple of peculiar internal ricochets and exit wounds. The conclusion was that whilst retaining the weight, the bullet with minimal expansion, was passing through the chest cavity without imparting much of its energy in the animal, leaving it standing and leading to a relatively slow death. Post Mortem results in the larder would tend to confirm this with minimal damage to the organs.
The general conclusion over a drink afterwards, amongst both us and the stalkers was that lead free ammunition in the lesser calibers ( not that I ever thought I’d hear myself describe the venerable .270 Winchester as a lesser caliber) just isn’t there yet. The bullets generally, aren’t imparting the bulk of their energy into the carcass and the only way to ensure a knockdown kill is to put the shot through the shoulder, with the ensuing carcass damage. The stalkers opinion is that we’re going to have to use bigger diameter bullets ( let’s try and explain this to the average FEO ).
In General, I think we all felt disillusioned over the performance of what, with lead, had been perfectly capable calibers, which tended to bare out the experience of the professionals.
What are you’re thoughts and experiences and have any of you found any bullets which you feel are performing well on the larger animals.
Not all lead free ammo is made equal. Neilson seems to strike the best balance in my testing (over 6000 deer) as the large fragments still cary energy and continue to penetrate. Others seem to have fragments that are too light with only the base/ shank penetrating well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DCG
Remember the old days.

A thread of the 243 for example would have a similar theme, x-bullet doesn't work y-bullet is fabulous.

Bullet performance varies with impact velocity at impact and spin speed, then bullet design are they desired for quick or slow expansion.

Lead/non lead, the bullet must suit the situation.
 
Interesting points, I should declare that I do shoot copper ammunition ( and other non lead bullets) and also was in Scotland last week. I have copper options in .260, 300 Win Mag and .375 H&H. The 260 (127gn LRX) is the only 6.5 bullet that will perform with reasonable accuracy from my 6.5 rifles (two others in 6.5 x55). I have noticed that it does not kill fallow or red deer quite as quickly as described above. The accuracy is ok, not ideal for range use to impress people but in 308, which I see used extensively at work for target practice (165 gn Sako Barnes power head) is very good capable of hitting consistent shots into a 10cm circle at 600metres. (We shoot about 18-20000 rounds of this per year)
After a less than immediate kill on a large calf with the .260, I switched back to the Win mag loaded with 180 grain Barnes TTSX. Nothing bothered to find me on the .375 outing!
I have tried the Neilson in 416. Works fine but horrible shot from prone so not a Scottish choice! Conclusion: for me, copper is best in smaller calibres when it hits bone on its track through the animal.
 
Sako Blade 120 and 162 in 308 drop fallow with more reliability than Geco lead soft points in my limited experience. Yewtree 125.6 drop them just as quick if not better than the Sako Blade.
 
Hopefully heading up to Scotland on the hinds in a few weeks . Will be using 150g Fox in 30-06. Will be interesting to see the results.
 
I have been using Fox Classic Hunter 130gr in 7mm-08 (factory) on reds for five seasons now. Usually shoot 4 -5 stags and 20-30 hinds each year. The stuff works very well, in general. A few anomalies, but no more than I used to have before moving away from lead. Put it in the right place and the deer dies. Expansion is fine, in my own experience - though I think I do tend to shoot a bit higher up on the beasts than I used to. I think it almost certainly performs better than the Federal 140g lead I used for at least a decade beforehand.
 
Last edited:
The sample size above is too small to draw any conclusions from

If people actually thought about all the deer they shot with lead you will find plenty of anomalies
But would you immediately blame the metal the bullet was made from

I shoot mostly sika these days
Those hardy ****ers all get shot in the high shoulder as they dont appear to know when they are dead.
Using non frangible non lead in high shoulder shots produces noticeably less carcase damage as the lack of secondary wound channels and particles doesnt mince the meat

shooting other species I wouldn’t hesitate to shoot them in a standard heart/lung or straight lung shot
A well chosen weight class in any cartridge matched to expected terminal for the quarry will produce solid knock down results
 
Home loaded Barnes 110gr ttsx , Sako blades 120gr , for the 270 and you’ll have a highly effective round.

I personally use hasler ariete 108 gr in my 6.5 284.


I won’t be going back to lead, I shot heavy red stags and rutting sika stags mostly H&L to test the bullets qualities.

I won’t be going back to lead in the 6.5 284.
 
Used the fox classic 130 grn in my 270 and worked well on a recent red stag trip in the rut. Three good old stags in full rut and all chest shot. Be back up soon on the red hinds with same ammo.
 
Have shot several hundred with .270 Sako blade. Haven’t noticed any difference from lead. The odd one going a few steps further on, but as stated already on this thread, they didn’t all drop on the spot either with lead.

Admittedly, and I don’t apologise for it, I do shoot them through the shoulders. Highland Game even sent out an email to suggest bullet placement a bit further forward and hit bone. This definitely reduces the opportunity for non expansion.

Out of all the brands used locally, I’ve heard one stalker who didn’t get on well with blades, none with cx, and a small number who have stated they have had issues with other brands on the market. Again, with lead, some rifles like certain brands and don’t perform with others. We’re seeing the same on occasions with lead free.

One thing is for sure, it’s what we need to use going forward, and if you are selling a number of carcasses then it isn’t going away. Personally due to the positive experience I’ve had with my rifle and ammo combination, I wouldn’t go back.
 
Shot 12 hinds this week and a button stag oops with yew tree tlr out of a 6.5x55 stalker was impressed with the performance. I’d say home loads a lot of factory is pretty poor.
Overall I’ve shot probably 250plus deer with yew tree tlr and there better than any lead I’ve shot
 
Last edited:
The sample size above is too small to draw any conclusions from
I came to say that, all the discussion so far is anecdotal. It would be better to do a meta report, compiling all our small samples into an overall study. I would be happy to submit my bag return data to a organisation or individual willing to do this.

My experience with copper is extremely limited, two beasts with Sako Powerhead Blade .270”. Spilt the hearts and they each ran on <30 yards. Very typical shot reaction.
 
Back
Top