EU ban on lead ammunition for airguns, shotguns and rifles

Status
Not open for further replies.
There were some French shooting organisations who honestly believed that EU gun laws were driven by the U.K. and we’re glad to see Brexit… oops.

That said, the figures are really quite small. 100K birds a year die from ingesting lead, according to the LAG (Lead Ammunition Group). About the same number that are killed by wind farms, according to the RSPB. But studies reckon 55 Million, yes FIFTY FIVE MILLION birds are killed by cats… in the U.K…. every year!!!

Not enough people are told to STFU.
In that case better off using remaining lead ammo on cats ,just a thought .
 
So, I see no mention of this anywhere so I thought I would post. Meeting held monday 26th.

Most European Union countries reject the ban on the use of lead in hunting and angling proposed by Brussels.​

During Monday's meeting of agriculture ministers in Brussels, the draft of the new regulation was discussed. At the request of the Czech Republic and Slovakia, the vast majority of countries rejected the European Commission's proposal to ban the use of lead in hunting ammunition and fishing gear.
The ministers criticized the idea, pointing out that such a regulation would threaten food security and even the defence readiness of the European Union. European Commissioner for the Environment Jessika Roswall defended the proposal developed by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – stressing that it is based on a scientific risk assessment...

Three months ago, the European Commission presented a draft of a total ban on the use of lead in hunting and angling. Now individual ministers have expressed their reservations, pointing to the huge economic costs that will burden the ammunition manufacturing sector. In their opinion, the possible closure of companies and the reduction of production will have a negative impact on European defence, recreational fishing and the management of game species such as wild boar...

Among others, the Minister of Agriculture of Spain emphasized that in the current situation, the ban will prevent the reduction of wild boars in his country, and the increasing number of this species is a real risk for agriculture. Greece, Portugal, Italy, Austria and Latvia have all expressed concern about the lack of alternatives to lead. Sweden, on the other hand, questioned the reliability of the scientific data used to justify this decision.

All in all, after listening to all the arguments, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Austria, Latvia, Italy, Sweden, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, Lithuania and Finland expressed their opposition to this proposal. All in all, the European Commission was left alone with the project, which is supported by anti-hunting organizations.
 
So, I see no mention of this anywhere so I thought I would post. Meeting held monday 26th.

Most European Union countries reject the ban on the use of lead in hunting and angling proposed by Brussels.​

During Monday's meeting of agriculture ministers in Brussels, the draft of the new regulation was discussed. At the request of the Czech Republic and Slovakia, the vast majority of countries rejected the European Commission's proposal to ban the use of lead in hunting ammunition and fishing gear.
The ministers criticized the idea, pointing out that such a regulation would threaten food security and even the defence readiness of the European Union. European Commissioner for the Environment Jessika Roswall defended the proposal developed by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – stressing that it is based on a scientific risk assessment...

Three months ago, the European Commission presented a draft of a total ban on the use of lead in hunting and angling. Now individual ministers have expressed their reservations, pointing to the huge economic costs that will burden the ammunition manufacturing sector. In their opinion, the possible closure of companies and the reduction of production will have a negative impact on European defence, recreational fishing and the management of game species such as wild boar...

Among others, the Minister of Agriculture of Spain emphasized that in the current situation, the ban will prevent the reduction of wild boars in his country, and the increasing number of this species is a real risk for agriculture. Greece, Portugal, Italy, Austria and Latvia have all expressed concern about the lack of alternatives to lead. Sweden, on the other hand, questioned the reliability of the scientific data used to justify this decision.

All in all, after listening to all the arguments, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Austria, Latvia, Italy, Sweden, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, Lithuania and Finland expressed their opposition to this proposal. All in all, the European Commission was left alone with the project, which is supported by anti-hunting organizations.
Have you a source for this?
Haven’t heard a word from our reps.
 
Oh no it won’t 🤡
Look behind you!

If the ban goes away in the EU, UK REACH’s rationale for the UK ban vanishes too.
I’ll be sitting here with crossed fingers, unfortunately our bunch have already accepted the wetlands definition and banned leadshot use over it.
The “Greens” are a pestilence and a plague we can do without.
I’m in favour of banning lead where it causes harm, I’m just not convinced that its causing harm everywhere its use is being banned.
 
So, I see no mention of this anywhere so I thought I would post. Meeting held monday 26th.

Most European Union countries reject the ban on the use of lead in hunting and angling proposed by Brussels.​

During Monday's meeting of agriculture ministers in Brussels, the draft of the new regulation was discussed. At the request of the Czech Republic and Slovakia, the vast majority of countries rejected the European Commission's proposal to ban the use of lead in hunting ammunition and fishing gear.
The ministers criticized the idea, pointing out that such a regulation would threaten food security and even the defence readiness of the European Union. European Commissioner for the Environment Jessika Roswall defended the proposal developed by the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) – stressing that it is based on a scientific risk assessment...

Three months ago, the European Commission presented a draft of a total ban on the use of lead in hunting and angling. Now individual ministers have expressed their reservations, pointing to the huge economic costs that will burden the ammunition manufacturing sector. In their opinion, the possible closure of companies and the reduction of production will have a negative impact on European defence, recreational fishing and the management of game species such as wild boar...

Among others, the Minister of Agriculture of Spain emphasized that in the current situation, the ban will prevent the reduction of wild boars in his country, and the increasing number of this species is a real risk for agriculture. Greece, Portugal, Italy, Austria and Latvia have all expressed concern about the lack of alternatives to lead. Sweden, on the other hand, questioned the reliability of the scientific data used to justify this decision.

All in all, after listening to all the arguments, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Greece, Spain, Portugal, Austria, Latvia, Italy, Sweden, Hungary, Bulgaria, Estonia, Lithuania and Finland expressed their opposition to this proposal. All in all, the European Commission was left alone with the project, which is supported by anti-hunting organizations.
Thanks, a video of the discussion is here:


It was under the last AOB item from 13:39 onwards.

The objections and recommendations by some countries were noted in this AOB of the agriculture/fisheries committee and scrutiny will continue under the EU REACH committee.
 
Well well well……..some good outta the EU after all
Best we don’t give up hope after all. If ‘lead free’ drives the supply of game into market place or hunters preference then so be it but to have choice removed by bureaucrats in white towers no no no.
 
All in all, the European Commission was left alone with the project, which is supported by anti-hunting organizations.
And BASC with its own volte face and proposed support of a ban on lead shot. But chooses to call it a "voluntary ban". But it's still nevertheless advancing a proposal to ban on lead shot. No matter how much they choose to try to back pedal from their February 2020 "declaration".
 
Last edited:
One thing that appears to have fallen by the wayside is phasing out plastic wads, I don't recall that the HSE thought that one through? Ironically everywhere that I use a shotgun, both clay and live quarry shooting there are no issues about using lead shot but plastic wads are strictly forbidden!
 
the use or not of plastic wads was not part of the scope of the HSE proposal to ban lead in ammunition.
It was however part of the voluntary transition as clearly a transition from lead shot to steel shot is untenable if the consequence is to litter the environment with non biodegradable plastic which will be in the environment for what a thousand years.
 
the use or not of plastic wads was not part of the scope of the HSE proposal to ban lead in ammunition.
It was however part of the voluntary transition as clearly a transition from lead shot to steel shot is untenable if the consequence is to litter the environment with non biodegradable plastic which will be in the environment for what a thousand years.
Micro plastic pollution and lead shot restrictions can't be looked at in isolation from each other, whats the latest from the cartridge manufacturers? Non lead, non plastic wad cartridges appear to be a very small segment of the market eg just cartridges etc
 
When is it being banned as a roofing material ?
No time soon. It is still being specified as mandatory to use lead roofing in many cases.

That is for the very good reason that there's no particular problem with the toxicity of lead anywhere except when it is used as ammunition, at which point it takes on magical properties which make it very hazardous to any organism which is NOT particularly exposed to it.
 
Bad news but we may stand a chance to either avoid or get slightly more sensible regulation than our European cousins.

Whilst I’m not keen on a ban on lead rifle ammunition for hunting and I’m sceptical as to whether it’s as good as lead, there is an alternative for deer stalking.

Target shooters will be b*ggered by these proposals. Without some as yet invented alternative, solid copper target bullets will just make target shooting uneconomic.
I heard a rumour that in a far away land called Cretina someone has started manufacturing super accurate and ballistically superior lead free bullets made from Unobtainable Chinesium and they’re coming to a shop near you.
KB.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top