Lead ammunition restrictions - government announcement

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whatever you are facing we will stand with you and for you, so stand with us because together we are allies, a tribe, a family
Just don't offer a differing opinion, or offer any criticism, or we'll label you an anti.
WE will decide what direction field sports go in, we don't need your input.
Just pay your subscription, keep your mouth shut, and tow the BASC council line.
You are too stupid and insignificant to matter to our broader goals.
 
BASC is indeed politically engaged. Here is the most recent example:


Perhaps your views of BASC are misplaced. This is what BASC stands for:



We are the ones who are here for you through thick and thin, fair weather and foul. From the corridors of power to every corner of your community we are your friendly face, your unrivalled experts. Whatever you are facing we will stand with you and for you, so stand with us because together we are allies, a tribe, a family. Together we are stronger, together we are BASC.


Your an AI bot aren't you 🤔
 
We are the ones who are here for you through thick and thin, fair weather and foul. From the corridors of power to every corner of your community we are your friendly face, your unrivalled experts. Whatever you are facing we will stand with you and for you, so stand with us because together we are allies, a tribe, a family. Together we are stronger, together we are BASC.
Long on rhetoric and posturing but the reality as witnessed in the ongoing posts supporting further lead shot restrictions paints a different picture. Hopefully the shooting community will see through the political sound bites quoted above aimed at creating unity when unfortunately their actions don’t merit such loyalty.
 
I can’t help noticing that the target of criticism has indicated a like to all the critical posts. :rofl:
Ideally criticism of your professional performance results in repercussions or at least an acceptance of accountability and acknowledgement that steps should be taken to redress shortcomings.
This disconnect is a worry and would seem to indicate that there is no recognition of fault and that any criticism is being attributed to a handful of malcontents rather than justified disapproval.
A worrying conclusion would be that the present undermining of BASC policy by its representative is a deliberate attempt to discredit the assosciation in the eyes of shooters and thus contribute to weakening BASC’s standing ,a similar tack has been taken by John Swift previously only for him to be honoured by the organisation. Rather than attempt to understand the doublespeak and hypocrisy involved the best move might be to seek representation elsewhere from the other national organisations .
 
Just seen this for those who don’t think lead ingestion from rifle bullets can have an impact:

Nobody thinks that and there are no cheetahs in the UK. How much more irrelevant and inapplicable cam these arguments in favour of banning lead ammunition get?
 
Just seen this for those who don’t think lead ingestion from rifle bullets can have an impact:

The only doubt is whether sufficient impact exists to justify the introduction of draconian legislation. To date no such data has surfaced . Recently observing the survival rates of mallard ducklings on the river I fish their failure to survive rate greatly exceeds any modelled numbers being produced regarding inland game birds losses to lead shot poisoning. Bearing in mind that agenda driven figures will undoubtedly carry bias I don’t think that the crusade to ban lead shot is proportionate to the risk involved in its use.
Does anyone seriously think that a complete ban on lead shot use in clay pigeon shooting will result in any measurable environmental improvements to justify such a move. If so I’d be interested in hearing the reasoning behind the belief.
 
The only doubt is whether sufficient impact exists to justify the introduction of draconian legislation. To date no such data has surfaced . Recently observing the survival rates of mallard ducklings on the river I fish their failure to survive rate greatly exceeds any modelled numbers being produced regarding inland game birds losses to lead shot poisoning. Bearing in mind that agenda driven figures will undoubtedly carry bias I don’t think that the crusade to ban lead shot is proportionate to the risk involved in its use.
Does anyone seriously think that a complete ban on lead shot use in clay pigeon shooting will result in any measurable environmental improvements to justify such a move. If so I’d be interested in hearing the reasoning behind the belief.
A local lass gets 1000,s of lead shot pigeons donated for her ferret rescue centre, a second lady in Nth Essex has had the same for 30 + years
I don't have ferrets know but mine got them for 35 years also my friend Chris feeds his on them and has had a lot since March.

That is a fair time to work out that something we were giving our pets was not good for them and trust me had it been harm full they would have not had them.
A friend in Lincoln took 3k to a dealer who had a 30k order for Holland last year.

@Conor O'Gorman
 
A local lass gets 1000,s of lead shot pigeons donated for her ferret rescue centre, a second lady in Nth Essex has had the same for 30 + years
I don't have ferrets know but mine got them for 35 years also my friend Chris feeds his on them and has had a lot since March.

That is a fair time to work out that something we were giving our pets was not good for them and trust me had it been harm full they would have not had them.
A friend in Lincoln took 3k to a dealer who had a 30k order for Holland last year.

@Conor O'Gorman
Thanks. My understanding is that lead ingestion in mammals (including humans) from shot or traces of lead in game meat is much less likely to cause poisoning than in birds due to different digestive systems. I don't know of any case of humans dying from lead shot poisoning. It is the sub-lethal impacts that are of concern as has been discussed in this and other threads. For birds it is a different matter as most people now accept. That is why falconers won't take game that might contain lead shot.
 
Thanks. My understanding is that lead ingestion in mammals (including humans) from shot or traces of lead in game meat is much less likely to cause poisoning than in birds due to different digestive systems. I don't know of any case of humans dying from lead shot poisoning. It is the sub-lethal impacts that are of concern as has been discussed in this and other threads. For birds it is a different matter as most people now accept. That is why falconers won't take game that might contain lead shot.
All the pigeons over the years had their chance to die by eating lead shot but in fact they died by being shot with it.
Birds of Prey will scavenge so any bird they pick up with bird flu will be passed on causing the death of that bird of prey.
The Kites are soon over a gralloch.

:doh:

In the UK, several birds of prey will scavenge for food, including Red Kites, Buzzards, and sometimes even Gulls and Ravens. While they primarily hunt, these birds will also consume carrion (dead animals) when available. Red Kites, in particular, are known for scavenging, especially along roadsides where they look for roadkill.
 
All the pigeons over the years had their chance to die by eating lead shot but in fact they died by being shot with it.
Birds of Prey will scavenge so any bird they pick up with bird flu will be passed on causing the death of that bird of prey.
The Kites are soon over a gralloch.

:doh:

In the UK, several birds of prey will scavenge for food, including Red Kites, Buzzards, and sometimes even Gulls and Ravens. While they primarily hunt, these birds will also consume carrion (dead animals) when available. Red Kites, in particular, are known for scavenging, especially along roadsides where they look for roadkill.
funny you should mention that an estate i look after has a thriving kite population and theyre never off the grallochs
 
All the pigeons over the years had their chance to die by eating lead shot but in fact they died by being shot with it.
Birds of Prey will scavenge so any bird they pick up with bird flu will be passed on causing the death of that bird of prey.
The Kites are soon over a gralloch.

:doh:

In the UK, several birds of prey will scavenge for food, including Red Kites, Buzzards, and sometimes even Gulls and Ravens. While they primarily hunt, these birds will also consume carrion (dead animals) when available. Red Kites, in particular, are known for scavenging, especially along roadsides where they look for roadkill.
Not sure what the point is of tagging me with queries, when you have the answers. The HSE review began in 2021, the ECHA review in 2019, all of the science has been discussed and argued from every viewpoint, now a timetable has been set for GB and will soon be determined in the EU + NI.

As for BASC, this is from the FAQ:

Will BASC continue to lobby against any aspects of the proposed ban?

The Government has shortened the expected timeframe for shotgun ammunition from five years to three years on the assumption that the ammunition is readily available – that is not the case for commercial and supply reasons beyond our sector’s control – and we are urging the government to oppose the shortened proposal of three years and go back to the to a five-year timescale proposed by the Health and Safety Executive.

BASC has concerns with the proposed reclassification of larger calibres to include .243. This risks adversely affecting around 60,000 deer stalkers and could have a serious impact on the national deer cull, which affects road safety, food production and undermines government environmental priorities.

We will continue to lobby Ministers on the issues that relate to .243 such as stabilisation and the lack of muzzle energy, requesting that large calibres be set at 6.5mm and above.

 
Not sure what the point is of tagging me with queries, when you have the answers. The HSE review began in 2021, the ECHA review in 2019, all of the science has been discussed and argued from every viewpoint, now a timetable has been set for GB and will soon be determined in the EU + NI.

As for BASC, this is from the FAQ:

Will BASC continue to lobby against any aspects of the proposed ban?

The Government has shortened the expected timeframe for shotgun ammunition from five years to three years on the assumption that the ammunition is readily available – that is not the case for commercial and supply reasons beyond our sector’s control – and we are urging the government to oppose the shortened proposal of three years and go back to the to a five-year timescale proposed by the Health and Safety Executive.

BASC has concerns with the proposed reclassification of larger calibres to include .243. This risks adversely affecting around 60,000 deer stalkers and could have a serious impact on the national deer cull, which affects road safety, food production and undermines government environmental priorities.

We will continue to lobby Ministers on the issues that relate to .243 such as stabilisation and the lack of muzzle energy, requesting that large calibres be set at 6.5mm and above.

My suggestion is to ask admin to lock any future threads then people can read "only" then PM you their thoughts.

As for tagging you in, you cherry pick your replies as in post 1065 you manage a 👍
But take the time to ask me why I tagged you in.

Honestly most of it is like watching a game of KerPlunk with the main players who made these studies pulling the sticks not knowing which marble will fall in which tray with the end coming in 2029.
 
My suggestion is to ask admin to lock any future threads then people can read "only" then PM you their thoughts.

As for tagging you in, you cherry pick your replies as in post 1065 you manage a 👍
But take the time to ask me why I tagged you in.

Honestly most of it is like watching a game of KerPlunk with the main players who made these studies pulling the sticks not knowing which marble will fall in which tray with the end coming in 2029.
Good idea. About time this frankenthread got put out of its misery. You may see more use of the like button from me also to acknowledge POVs directed at me. As for Kerplunk yes a good analogy regularly used for in policy and political circles.
 
Where BASC also the other "people" fail to see or don't want to the Post office scandal run on a parallel track to shooting.
I can hear the cries "oh no they don't"

They both employ a lot of people turning over millions of £'s from the person doing the cleaning to people at the very top taking a large salary.
In the last 20 years the people at "grass roots" have been saying the "data" is wrong.
The last 20 years the people at the top have been saying the "data" is correct.
It has taken people being dragged under oath being questioned by Barristers and millions to find out the "data" was incorrect.
People have lost everything (even their lives) because those making studies stuck to the data story so blood is on the hands of the PO
Shoots will close, people who know nothing else will be left with nowhere to turn and I hate to think how they will survive.
Play Kerplunk as much as you like but not at the risk of changing the lives of people forever. :doh:
@Conor O'Gorman
 
I can’t help noticing that the target of criticism has indicated a like to all the critical posts. :rofl:
Ideally criticism of your professional performance results in repercussions or at least an acceptance of accountability and acknowledgement that steps should be taken to redress shortcomings.
This disconnect is a worry and would seem to indicate that there is no recognition of fault and that any criticism is being attributed to a handful of malcontents rather than justified disapproval.
A worrying conclusion would be that the present undermining of BASC policy by its representative is a deliberate attempt to discredit the assosciation in the eyes of shooters and thus contribute to weakening BASC’s standing ,a similar tack has been taken by John Swift previously only for him to be honoured by the organisation. Rather than attempt to understand the doublespeak and hypocrisy involved the best move might be to seek representation elsewhere from the other national organisations .
These personal remarks are now out of line and not required.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top