The modern rifle?

wildfowler.250

Well-Known Member
What does a modern stalking rifle for the next 20 years look like and require?

I’ve had my current rifle for 20 years - sako 75 in .270 and no real need to change it. But I think about it often. In truth it could probably last me,(give or take a new barrel) until I die but is that a bit boring?

If you were to pick something tomorrow to last a long time and guarantee above average accuracy, what would you go for? Something that can shoot a fox out lamping, targets on a Sunday or a rare day on an estate for a red deer. A do it all that you could maybe take abroad if desired with ease.

I really like my wooden stock rifles but everything new seems to be mostly in synthetic. All these rifles being built for competitions look like something out of a sniper film - but its accuracy you’re building/buying at the end of the day so is this the way to go? Most of these modern rifles seem to have almost a pistol grip type action and I really feel a cheek riser would be a must.

Caliber: Does flat shooting really matter now? I’m very much a point and shoot guy but most people have a range finder. A lot of custom turrets are available so that you can just set the yardage on the scope. Certainly gunwerks/leupold all seem to go to is way.

Detachable rails/scope: this seems a real plus for travel and storage. Switch barrels - I’m slowly becoming a one caliber person. Maybe still an advantage.

What’s your thoughts. If you were to spec something tomorrow would you go for a semi custom job,(say PSE stock and new barrel) or an off the shelf blaser/gunwerks? Money obviously being a consideration,(or at least everyone’s idea of value for money) and if you’re reverting to a 6x42 on a stutzen then that’s also fine!

I’m starting to think one rifle to do everything is the way to go and leaning towards the PSE type rifle on the left. Possibly in 6.5PRC or 6.5CM. But then again, blaser seems to have the cult modern following in the uk for accuracy and usability. The tikka tactical is a bit too much for me at this stage.


(Stock photos from google)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9359.webp
    IMG_9359.webp
    310.1 KB · Views: 110
  • IMG_9360.webp
    IMG_9360.webp
    41.6 KB · Views: 108
  • IMG_9363.webp
    IMG_9363.webp
    56.1 KB · Views: 108
I would stick with .270, as it's a calibre I've come to love.
It would be a classic styled rifle (walnut and blued steel) because it would have to give me pleasure in use.
The stock would be custom made to fit me properly.
It would have open sights, but be threaded in front of the foresight to give me the option of using a mod.
The scope would be quick detachable, so when I was being charged by an elephant or some other dangerous beast I could coolly remove the scope and use open sights for the close range shots.
It would have a blind mag, as I think that's the prettiest option and no chance of losing a part or accidentally dumping rounds.

I think I'm an incurable romantic with delusions of grandeur.
 
The new Purdey with the titanium bedding is "modern" and fits your criteria, but perhaps not your wallet?

Our something with everything adjustable, picatinny rails everywhere looking like a mecanno kit.

The deer won't notice.
 
I would stick with .270, as it's a calibre I've come to love.
It would be a classic styled rifle (walnut and blued steel) because it would have to give me pleasure in use.
The stock would be custom made to fit me properly.
It would have open sights, but be threaded in front of the foresight to give me the option of using a mod.
The scope would be quick detachable, so when I was being charged by an elephant or some other dangerous beast I could coolly remove the scope and use open sights for the close range shots.
It would have a blind mag, as I think that's the prettiest option and no chance of losing a part or accidentally dumping rounds.

I think I'm an incurable romantic with delusions of grandeur.

To be fair I get what you’re saying. That schultz and Larsen looks great. Just needs an adjustable cheek piece which doesn’t seem to be a think in wooden stocks
 
The new Purdey with the titanium bedding is "modern" and fits your criteria, but perhaps not your wallet?

Our something with everything adjustable, picatinny rails everywhere looking like a mecanno kit.

The deer won't notice.
I’ll start selling foot pics now..
I’ve never quite understood why picatinny overtook dove tail mounts. Can mount lower? Or fit a longer scope?
My stalking rifle for the next 20years is a tikka 695 in 7x57 horlicks to new calibres and designs
The PH I hunted with described the 7x57 as a ‘brush gun’. But it does seem to have a popular following
 
Having had exposure to highly adjustable skeletonised and multi-calibre (swap out barrel, bolt and mag) rifles, I'll quite happily stick with my .308Win Remington PSS.
The only modifications I've made were to put a removable (velcro) Kydex cheek riser on it and had it re-cut to take a different threaded suppressor.
I've equipped it with some good, solid, steel rail and rings, a Quake Claw sling and it came with a stud for a bipod (I use a Harris, sometimes).
I've not changed the trigger, nor had it blueprinted or any other funky things.
It shoots reliably and I know my drops.
One day, when it is shot out, I'll just get a new barrel put on it.
 
I'd personally still want something that shoots as flat as possible, why make things more difficult than i have too. Possibly 6.5prc . An ambidextrous carbon stock with a titanium mod. Keep the set up as light as possible. Possibly a sauer 404/505 . Yes, dream big.
But thats me.
 
Interesting replies folks. Little surprised it’s much more the ‘classics’ replies than the blaser / PSE / gunwerks demographic on here. Maybe that’s because 1” moa with a nice wooden stock is sufficient for within 300 yards
 
Interesting replies folks. Little surprised it’s much more the ‘classics’ replies than the blaser / PSE / gunwerks demographic on here. Maybe that’s because 1” moa with a nice wooden stock is sufficient for within 300 yards
The question is, what do you want from a stalking rifle?

I think the big money brands have had their day and the better quality factory and re barrelled factory actions are better value for money.
 
Interesting replies folks. Little surprised it’s much more the ‘classics’ replies than the blaser / PSE / gunwerks demographic on here. Maybe that’s because 1” moa with a nice wooden stock is sufficient for within 300 yards

I think for most stalkers it is a hobby, something to enjoy and cherish, as such they won’t be particularly cost sensitive and as you say accuracy isn’t really an issue.
 
I would stick with .270, as it's a calibre I've come to love.
It would be a classic styled rifle (walnut and blued steel) because it would have to give me pleasure in use
I love my.270, and have no plans to change it. However, I've recently developed a hankering for the .275 Rigby. I reckon my choice would be a Highland Stalker custom built to my own preference. With the options I want, my perfect 'modern' rifle is over £35k 🤔

 
I love my.270, and have no plans to change it. However, I've recently developed a hankering for the .275 Rigby. I reckon my choice would be a Highland Stalker custom built to my own preference. With the options I want, my perfect 'modern' rifle is over £35k 🤔

Mine was cheaper until I noticed they offer the London best in left hand...
 
Back
Top