Oh Dear...Firearms officer stored surrendered guns at home

Morkai

Well-Known Member

Investigation uncovers misconduct​

A Firearms Enquiry Officer has admitted taking surrendered guns home, raising fresh concerns about the integrity of firearms licensing at a time when the Government is proposing sweeping reforms to the system.

Alan Sharp, 52, pled guilty at the High Court in Glasgow to three charges under the Firearms Act and one of wilful neglect of police duty after investigators found shotguns and rifle components at his home that should have been destroyed.

.

How the case unfolded​

The case centres on firearms Mr Sharp took into custody during 2021 whilst working in the Firearms and Explosive Licensing Unit in Perth. In January, he took possession of rifle component parts and firearm barrels surrendered under a government scheme at Kinross police station.

Ten months later, in November, the officer attended the home of a certificate holder who had decided not to renew his shotgun licence due to old age. Mr Sharp collected six shotguns, assuring the man they would be kept in a “safe holding area” before being transported to Glasgow for destruction.

But when an investigation was launched in July 2022 over concerns about Mr Sharp’s failure to carry out proper reference checks on applicants, a far more serious issue came to light.

.

Firearms found in secure cabinet​

Officers seizing Mr Sharp’s own shotgun certificate discovered all six guns – still in working order – stored in a secure cabinet at his Fife home. The rifle components from January were also found at the property. Internal records showed all these items had been officially listed as “destroyed”. Officers also recovered 1,919 bullets in 17 different calibres.

There was no record of Mr Sharp having signed out or removed any of the firearms from police custody. He told investigators he had received an “instruction” that firearms were not to be stored at Kinross police station and claimed he did not have time to move them to an armoury before starting annual leave.

.

Widespread falsified checks​

The investigation further revealed systemic failures in Mr Sharp’s work. On 75 occasions, mandatory checks had not been carried out, yet had been “falsely entered” as completed on application forms. Mr Sharp admitted not contacting all referees, citing “work related stress and time constraints”, and claimed it was not “necessary” to conduct checks if he knew people involved personally.

.

Reaction to the case​

Stuart Farr, partner at Harrison Drury solicitors, told Shooting Times: “The court case is still ongoing, but reports such as these only serve to undermine public confidence in Firearms departments across the country.

“This comes at a time when root and branch reforms to firearms licensing are being proposed. After years of criticism and patchy performance, it will no doubt beg the question whether any of those proposals would be necessary if the licensing authorities were demonstrably effective. As this case suggests, those without sin…”

.

Next steps​

Judge Lord Armstrong remanded Mr Sharp in custody and warned he could face a minimum five-year prison sentence. The case was adjourned until 8 December in Edinburgh.
 
I had some initial sympathy for him storing surrendered shotguns temporarily in a secure cabinet, but when I then read about the failures in checking applicants, and falsifying records, etc, that sympathy evaporated!
 
And it’s us that they are worried about!
Pretty much every legal firearm related incident over the past few years has been down to a failure somewhere within firearms licensing and admin, but in this day and age they really is no excuse (as I am sure we would get told of the boot was on the other foot).
 
@Conor O'Gorman I"ve just browsed the BASC news section but didnt see this. Have BASC covered this too as part of the ongoing consultations?
I'm sure that BASC would have been aware of this case as it was first reported in some newspapers or online some time ago. They possibly couldn't comment on it at the time as it would have been considered sub judice?
 
I'm sure that BASC would have been aware of this case as it was first reported in some newspapers or online some time ago. They possibly couldn't comment on it at the time as it would have been considered sub judice?

I only meant that now it's reported, has it been put forward as part of any licencing reform propsals etc.
 
I would say that for this to be able to happen is more a case for the force concerned to re-examine their own internal policies and procedures rather any reform of licensing being necessary.
 
I would say that for this to be able to happen is more a case for the force concerned to re-examine their own internal policies and procedures rather any reform of licensing being necessary.

They shouldnt have internal policies, it should be a national policy.
 
By internal policies I meant working practices not differences in how they apply legislation.
 
The problem is all the honest FEO's with an interest in shooting will be getting tarred with the same brush, when they are the ones who normally have the common sense and knowledge to make things run smoothly.
Never met an honest FEO or one that had a real interest in shooting in my life! Must be joking.
 
That must be a sad reflection on where you live and your local police force.
I would like to agree with you, but largely when it comes to FEOs actually being interested in shooting, since I have friends and other members from my rifle club who are with forces across the country it seems that nearly all of them have basic knowledge of firearms and an abysmal interest in shooting.
One of my mates from University I used to shoot competitively with is unfortunate enough to be with the Met, and his FEO was an ex armed response copper, you would think he likes shooting, the guy had barely any interest in it and had only ever shot fullbore rifles and pistols for training with the police. My friend had to explain to him several different disciplines of shooting, very basic stuff imo for an FEO to be aware of. They also lied to his face about his moderators he asked for! Shocking.
 
Back
Top