Lead - EU Reach Meeting/Proposal

Status
Not open for further replies.
The impact on wildlife was and is the primary reason for pursuing restrictions on lead. The USA has had a Federal ban on shooting wildfowl with lead since 1991.
The REACH proposal based on WHO recommendations is recent.
We don’t actually need to shoot game , it’s optional.
Use of agricultural chemicals and slurry spreading is
(A). Essential .
And
(B). Highly regulated.
Nobody needs a gun -that's what the antis say. We either stand united together or fall apart one by one just like the handgun, semi-auto c/f and hound sports have.
 
Just for the record, I worked in agriculture in Zambia and Zimbabwe for about 18 months in the early 1990’s. Tobacco was just another crop.

At that point in time, everyone smoked, tobacco sponsorship was everywhere, hamlet cigars where advertised on the TV, Camel Trophy sponsored Landrover, multiple different brands sponsored F1. People smoked on trains, planes, in the tube, in the pub, in offices and in hospitals. Menthol cigarettes were sold to clear your lungs.

I was offered a very well paid job with Phillip Morris, but turned it down. I didn’t like the way the industry behaved.

Tobacco smoking other in your own home is now pretty much banned in all public spaces, and has been for 15 plus years. It is banned so that others don’t have to suffer from second hand smoke.

More recently I have been involved with technologies to produce large molecule drugs within tobacco plants that are biosimilar to many very expensive cancer drugs, in particular Herceptin. These are mostly produced in animals cells in very expensive bioreactors. Use plants dramatically reduces the manufacturing costs of such drugs, so making them much more accessible. These are now in clinical trials.

As regards lead, there has long been evidence of how dangerous and harmful to biological processes it actually is. Long ago lead was banned for use in food packaging, as a food ingredient, use in solders for water supplies and in any form of water pipes. Lead pipes in old houses are still there. Like asbestos, this causes difficulties when trying to any works or to sell the property- it all has to be disclosed. Lead is no longer used in household products, paints, industrial processes etc.

There are very strict regulations on lead content in slurries, fertilisers etc etc.

Yet many on SD are just whining that its against their rights that they are being banned from spreading one of the most toxic substances known to man around the countryside. The government has in my view made the correct decision in banning lead from ammunition. There are perfectly viable alternatives that work for 99% of guns in use. If you really want to continue a 100 plus year old damascus barreled shotgun then buy bismuth cartridges and savour each shot. If you are using a muzzle loading rifle, experiment with patched monolithic bullets, or just stick to shooting on an approved rifle range.

By removing lead, shooting is cleaning up its own house and removing one of principle objections of the anti brigade. When you shoot lead cartridges, that lead is no polluting the wider environment and not just yourself.
Actually, now you come to mention it, but where is the non-lead alternative for 9mm Flobert rimfire garden gun? Can you post a link please?
 
Oh I think BASC already addressed this. As below in a thread "Lead ammunition restrictions - government announcement" started on SD on 10 July 2025.

Of course I suppose I could get some Olympic athletes to come and shoot them as their lead shot (which they'll fire more weight of lead in a day than weight of lead I have, or will ever have, fired in my sixty-eight years of lifetime, ever, from my 9mm Webley No3 Garden Gun) is somehow not the same sort of lead?

I wrote:

What of .22 Rimfire and 9mm Rimfire shotguns? I shot a rat in my garden two months back with my 9mm Rimfire Webley bolt action. These can't be reloaded and there are NO non-lead options? The number is so few that there should at the very least be a push for these to be exempted.

From Conor O'Gorman

That rat you shot with lead shot came at the expense of how many birds that subsequently ate the lead shot you fired in your garden? Maybe none, maybe some. That is perhaps the bigger picture to bear in mind as regards live quarry shooting where the risks of lead shot dissemination cannot be contained.
Makes you wonder how birds of prey have been doing so well........
 
See my recent post #140 a page just back on this same thread.
I think that what is missing from O'Gorman's argument is not only any sense of proportionality but also hard evidence of 9mm Flobert causing any problems other than a very,very remote " lead & its compounds are toxic" therefore.... etc.
The widespread use of lead based anti-fouling from boats doesn't get a mention, acid rain on lead roof flashings, and that much of the lead toxicity that people have been afflicted by are those arising from the noxious gases of lead acetate additives to petrol, melting lead sheeting/soldering of leadwork, and blow torching of old lead paint, just to name a few. As for that risible notion that O'Gorman put forward of grey partridge chicks scoffing up spent shot I can only suggest that he brushes up on his gamekeeping skills and puts some grit out for his birds!
 
Whilst I agree in principle with what you’re saying, but it’s yet to be proven that a lead bullet is harmful!

So in reality, the only way you or I are going to die from a lead bullet, is if we’re stupid enough to be standing in front of the barrel once the trigger is pulled!

That is the only way you can guarantee that you were gonna die from lead poisoning from a bullet.

Please correct me if I’m wrong
Agree that a lead bullet will kill you.

In terms of proof:

Lets agree that ingested lead is harmful. That is the general consensus of the medical professions, who etc.

A lead based bullet typically leaves 50% of its mass as fragments within the carcass and gralloch.

Then is it possible that lead fragments in venison and game are bioavailable???

Two studies in particular.

1) Hunt et al in 2009, published the following research where they fed pigs (breed and used for scientific purposes) with lead contaminated venison. Pigs are commonly used as a surrogate for man in scientific/ medical experiments. They showed that after eating lead contaminated venison there was significant rise in the blood levels of lead in the pigs. After a time blood lead levels will go down as the lead is then deposited in bone and bone marrow.


2) A further study in 2021 in Germany took the above work further. The pigs lead contaminated venison. The also marinated the meat in vinegar. This give rise to lead acetate, and they showed that marination of game meat increases of lead 5 to 6 fold. The article cites Spanish work on quail with shot pellets that yealded similar results.
Marination increases the bioavailability of lead in game meat shot with lead ammunition - PMC

Both of used X-Rays to determine lead in the meat.

Recent studies using electron microscopes have shown that lead bullets fragment in nano sized particles and these are widely transported around the animal carcass. Thesis is the particles are transported in the blood in the last moments of life. These nano particles cannot be detected by X-rays and are small enough, that when eaten they will pass through the gut wall directly into the blood.


There is now a large body of work showing that lead is a significant contributory factor to whole host of different diseases, from impairment of children’s growth and development, infertility, dementia and cancers, in particular blood cancers. The WHO’s position is that there is no safe level of lead in man. Certainly work on Leukaemia and Small Cell Lung cancer shows a very strong correlation between the diseases and lead in the blood at a nano gram level per litre of blood. Studies in patients with secondary AML where the lead is removed using chelation has shown a very high survival rate now three years after those studies were down. Normal survival rate after secondary acute myeloid leukaemia is a matter of days. This approach to treatment has no received orphan drug status (ie can be used in the terminally ill) and is going forward into clinical trials.
 
I think that what is missing from O'Gorman's argument is not only any sense of proportionality but also hard evidence of 9mm Flobert causing any problems other than a very,very remote " lead & its compounds are toxic" therefore.... etc.
The widespread use of lead based anti-fouling from boats doesn't get a mention, acid rain on lead roof flashings, and that much of the lead toxicity that people have been afflicted by are those arising from the noxious gases of lead acetate additives to petrol, melting lead sheeting/soldering of leadwork, and blow torching of old lead paint, just to name a few. As for that risible notion that O'Gorman put forward of grey partridge chicks scoffing up spent shot I can only suggest that he brushes up on his gamekeeping skills and puts some grit out for his birds!
Lead based antifoulings were banned a number of years ago.
 
Agree that a lead bullet will kill you.

In terms of proof:

Lets agree that ingested lead is harmful. That is the general consensus of the medical professions, who etc.

A lead based bullet typically leaves 50% of its mass as fragments within the carcass and gralloch.

Then is it possible that lead fragments in venison and game are bioavailable???

Two studies in particular.

1) Hunt et al in 2009, published the following research where they fed pigs (breed and used for scientific purposes) with lead contaminated venison. Pigs are commonly used as a surrogate for man in scientific/ medical experiments. They showed that after eating lead contaminated venison there was significant rise in the blood levels of lead in the pigs. After a time blood lead levels will go down as the lead is then deposited in bone and bone marrow.


2) A further study in 2021 in Germany took the above work further. The pigs lead contaminated venison. The also marinated the meat in vinegar. This give rise to lead acetate, and they showed that marination of game meat increases of lead 5 to 6 fold. The article cites Spanish work on quail with shot pellets that yealded similar results.
Marination increases the bioavailability of lead in game meat shot with lead ammunition - PMC

Both of used X-Rays to determine lead in the meat.

Recent studies using electron microscopes have shown that lead bullets fragment in nano sized particles and these are widely transported around the animal carcass. Thesis is the particles are transported in the blood in the last moments of life. These nano particles cannot be detected by X-rays and are small enough, that when eaten they will pass through the gut wall directly into the blood.


There is now a large body of work showing that lead is a significant contributory factor to whole host of different diseases, from impairment of children’s growth and development, infertility, dementia and cancers, in particular blood cancers. The WHO’s position is that there is no safe level of lead in man. Certainly work on Leukaemia and Small Cell Lung cancer shows a very strong correlation between the diseases and lead in the blood at a nano gram level per litre of blood. Studies in patients with secondary AML where the lead is removed using chelation has shown a very high survival rate now three years after those studies were down. Normal survival rate after secondary acute myeloid leukaemia is a matter of days. This approach to treatment has no received orphan drug status (ie can be used in the terminally ill) and is going forward into clinical trials.
So reading Into all that tripe, can you find me someone who is sick or dying from lead poisoning caused by lead shot deer or game?

Simple yes or no will do.
 
So reading Into all that tripe, can you find me someone who is sick or dying from lead poisoning caused by lead shot deer or game?

Simple yes or no will do.
Yes - two. I lost a good friend, and an uncle who both ate a lot of lead shot game during their life. They both developed myeloma and lived with that for a few years and then switched to full blown leukaemia and they were dead within a few weeks. Friend was tested fir lead and had elevated levels in his blood. I did try and get him on the trials, but he was dead before we get things organised. The trials were being done in the US and Netherlands.

If you have any friends or family who eat game and are suffering from dementia, small cell lung cancer or blood cancers, chances are they have elevated levels of lead in the body. Challenge is that levels are still quite low - 25 nmols per litre, which is below threshold, of what NHS considers harmful. The thresholds are looking at acute lead toxicity, not long term triggering disease.

Have a read of




Note quite sure why you use the words “tripe” - what I describe is good peer reviewed science published in leading journals that is now progressing into treatments for cancer that involve removing lead and other heavy metals.

Part of the science to support the clinical trials is a body of work showing why lead is so disruptive - it affects how your immune system tackles cancerous cells in the body. We all produce mutations - its part of everday cell growth. Our immune system keeps these mutations under control.

Lead stops the immune proteins from being able to capture onto the cancerous cells.

To be honest, it matters not whether you or any others think that the science is “tripe”.

What matters is that the powers that be have looked at all the evidence and made their rulings based on the science that lead in any form is harmful, whether its ingested directly through eating game, breathed in as lead salts as part of exhaust fumes, or consumed in water or in plants that have been grown on contaminated land.

The Game and Wildlife Trust publish the following summary which gives an easy to understand overview


This was written a few years and thus doesn’t reference much of the recently published work.
 
Last edited:
Yes - two. I lost a good friend, and an uncle who both a lot of game during their life. They both developed myeloma and lived with that for a few years and then switched to full blown leukaemia and they were dead within a few weeks. Friend was tested fir lead and had elevated levels in his blood. I did try and get him on the trials, but he was dead before we get things organised. The trials were being done in the US and Netherlands.
So was lead shot game the proven cause?

Again yes or no

My grandfather also died of the myeloma and full blown leukaemia and never touched game in this life, so really that sort of kicks that into touch
 
So was lead shot game the proven cause?

Again yes or no

My grandfather also died of the myeloma and full blown leukaemia and never touched game in this life, so really that sort of kicks that into touch
No it was not proven. Mainly because lead ingestion is a long term effect and in most cases metals are not even looked for.

With your grandfather - had he ever been exposed to lead, had he breathed in petrol exhaust fumes etc. when did he die?

My grandmother lived to the age of 92, and drank bottles or red wine, gin and whisky and smoked 40 a day. She was completely pickled and demented, but died of old age.

You could equally say that alcohol and smoking does no harm.

Her half brother, also an alcoholic, who was a lightweight compared to her died of acute liver failure aged 50.

My brother in laws father was a heavy smoker and died of emphacaema in his late 60’s.
 
Last edited:
No it was not proven. Mainly because lead ingestion is a long term effect.

With your grandfather - had he ever been exposed to lead, had he breathed in petrol exhaust fumes etc. when did he die?
No lead exposure at all, the myeloma started in his spine and died about 10 years ago.

You can’t blame myeloma and Leukaemia on lead exposure, people die every day from the bastard disease, personally I think your scratching around for something to blame, if it was a common cause and 000’s of people have died of the PROVEN game meat lead cause then I would agree with you 100%
 
I was replying earlier but decided my bacon took priority over someone that wants to see the end of shooting as we know it.

Theres now a number of replies that entirely refute your point.

Bacon - carcinogenic and proven quite a bad one.
Smoking.
Fumes from vehicles.
Vehicles in general.

All toxic/bad for you. More wildlife is struck by vehicles than die from lead poisoning. Are we banning cars next? No. I wonder why? Maybe its because it doesn't fit with the anti shooting agenda.

Then you turn to pesticides and anything else sprayed/planted in fields. None of it is good! Then you've got the likes of major companies sending toxic substances down various rivers, alongside sewage. That's definitely killed more wildlife than lead poisoning yet they are allowed to continue?

Look at the bigger picture. It ain't because a couple of birds have died due to lead poisoning and that is the real issue.
I don’t see that you’ve made any point at all, certainly nothing there to refute anything I’ve said.
Your post is actually a miracle of “ whataboutery “, it contributes nothing to the discussion.

There are 2 main arguments against continuing to use lead.
(1). Incidental poisoning of wildlife associated with its use.
Proven beyond question.

(2). Impacts on human health
Again proven beyond question and the reason that the WHO have advised that there is no safe level of exposure.

You don’t have to believe that if it inconveniences you, but you’re in a small minority, most of us are happy to do what we can to reduce our exposure, and if that means legislating to prevent you personally from broadcasting lead unnecessarily into the environment, so be it, suck it up.
We’re done arguing
 
No lead exposure at all, the myeloma started in his spine and died about 10 years ago.

You can’t blame myeloma and Leukaemia on lead exposure, people die every day from the bastard disease, personally I think your scratching around for something to blame, if it was a common cause and 000’s of people have died of the PROVEN game meat lead cause then I would agree with you 100%
People do die every year from the bastard disease.

In 2020 research carried out at the MD Cancer Clinic in Houston Texas was published showing a clear link between heavy metals in the blood and Leukaemia. This was published in the American Journal of Haematology. MD Anderson is one of the Worlds leading reaearch hospitals in oncology.

I have referenced the articles above.

Subsequent to the above article, the same researchers did a trial on nearly 100 different patients all suffering from secondary leukaemia. Life expectancy was a few days.

They removed the lead and other heavy metals from their blood.

3 years later a large majority of those patients are fit and well and showing no sign of the disease.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top