Mauser 98 early 20th century - Hunting/Sporting

no offense meant.

.
None taken.
I actually sent a pic of one of my synthetic .300`s painted in MothWing Orange to a mate in Ireland...he answered with " that ****ing stock" I said " you will be using it you Irish cooooooont,so get over it ha ha "
SD member had no qualms shooting two sambar stags with me, one taken with above 7mm rm, other with the orange .300. I do have wood stocked deer rifles too.

7mm gets a pat.....sign on tree is a wild dog poison sign.

 
My first rifle, a Parker Hale .270 (I believe an 1100 Delux) topped with steel-tubed Weaver K-series multi-trac 4x32 was a Mauser 'type' action. Believed to have been built in the late '70s early 80s.

Any idea what action that would have been?

My only remaining photo of it
I think @tozzybum has the identical model rifle now, same style stock and everything, also in .270 and uncut.
Who knows, could even be the same rifle?
 
Its a Spanish Mauser action, assembled by Ph .I had the .243 screwcut at Brock and Norris and they confirmed it for me.
Ph just assembled a parts bin and I guess the " sloppy bolt" Spanish action was cheapest at the time atb .
 
Its a Spanish Mauser action, assembled by Ph .I had the .243 screwcut at Brock and Norris and they confirmed it for me.
Ph just assembled a parts bin and I guess the " sloppy bolt" Spanish action was cheapest at the time atb .
The characteristic "sloppy bolt" is a deliberate design feature that enables it to continue to function under adverse conditions such as desert sand. A "smoother" closer fitting bolt would be buggered up by a few grains of sand, but we can just shake the dirt out of ours and carry on shooting.
 
I’d personally say a BRNO 21H Mauser 98 action, with a ZG47 bolt, and 2 pos side safety on the bolt shroud, with an Argentine 1909 bottom metal is about as perfect as you could ever wish for, in 7x57 of course
Hey! that's what I have (I think), although unsure about the Argentine bottom metal. I'd add a butter knife bolt handle for added elegance 😍
 
I really like Mauser 98 type actions. But there were several million made as military rifles. They were tough and strong, but towards the end of wartime production a little were made of poor materials with conscript / slave labour. If using an old action to build a rifle you need to be sure of its provenance.

These days most of the poor actions are long gone. History has preserved the best. And modern clones - Prechtl, Mayfair etc are made at a level of quality well above a military original.

Difference between a military and a beautiful sporting rifle is many hours of time spent by a skilled craftsman perfecting the fit of the parts.

I also really like the old Mannlicher Schoeneur’s, indeed I would prefer a full length barrelled one in 6.5x54 over and above a Mauser. I don’t like the short full stocked ones.

These rifles were originally built in the days when open sights were the norm, telescopic sights were expensive and fragile. And the object of stalking was just that - stalking. Get in close and take your time to shoot properly. They were stocked and balanced to be shot using both hands to properly hold the rifle, and you need a firm hold to shoot them properly.

They are not heavy barreled chassis rifles with free floating barrels needing bipods and shooting tripods to take even a close range shot.

They were designed to be carried lots and shot little, but when the shot came to deliver acceptable accuracy.

In colonial times, the light rifle also did double duty when sorting out local difficulties. They were fitted with sights graduated out to long distances. These were not so much for trying to put an impala into the pot, but to provide harrying fire on bandits, locals who were anti colonial or dastardly members of an opposing colonial power. So farmers, hunters etc bought Mausers, Mannlichers and Enfields to both shoot game and protection.

Remember that in the early days of smokeless small bores, military officers also had to provide their own weapons, hence many of the above rifles.

Personally, being left handed, they all have a major draw back, but you can learn to live with it. But not the same as a proper handed rifle.

Push feeds work well and do the job. Many such actions do however use a spring powered plunger in the bolt face. These do need compressing and thus positive forward pressure on the bolt handle. But you get used to that.

Will these old rifles shoot. Depends. I have had a shot with an original open sighted mauser. With hand supported on a pack across a pickup bonnet keeping every shot inside a clay pigeon at 100 odd yards is straight forward enough. And in good light, with a good visible target you do better. Will you shoot half MoA all day long - probably not. Minute of deer vitals to reasonable distance - not a problem with practice.
 
I’d love to know what my Mauser action saw in its first life, since 1989 it’s been in a TT Proctor .375 H&H
 

Attachments

  • 7D328128-7057-4564-BABF-514808EF630A.webp
    7D328128-7057-4564-BABF-514808EF630A.webp
    112.2 KB · Views: 9
  • IMG_5232.webp
    IMG_5232.webp
    302.3 KB · Views: 9
  • A66DAA5E-56FB-44B3-8E18-6BF8C6441741.webp
    A66DAA5E-56FB-44B3-8E18-6BF8C6441741.webp
    131.8 KB · Views: 9
Back
Top