Sporting rates

Cush1902

Member
Has anyone been hit with these sporting rates for deer stalking the rates are over the top. It’s getting ridiculous they are complaining about the number of deer about and just keep hitting the stalkers pockets and what you get for the carcass is an absolute joke. Thinking of giving it a bye and see how the trees go and hit the owners of the trees in the pockets
 
Has anyone been hit with these sporting rates for deer stalking the rates are over the top. It’s getting ridiculous they are complaining about the number of deer about and just keep hitting the stalkers pockets and what you get for the carcass is an absolute joke. Thinking of giving it a bye and see how the trees go and hit the owners of the trees in the pockets
If it's a private farm you'll get an exemption,not sure about leases
 
We've had to pay it this year on our lease in Scotland, full sporting lease, £900.00
Might not renew it next year.
 
Most stalkers, if their lease is deer n vermin only, and not done on a commercial basis, will be able to claim relief on it.
But if they have other business assets that have a ratable value, afaik the stalking ratable value gets added on as well and if the combined value is more than £12000, then relief is limited.
(I think!)
 
The irony of the Jockistani governments bright ideas. The deer numbers increase, the trees and the all important "biodiversity" suffers, and the now more expensive leases are taken up by remote leaseholders, that don't spend anywhere near enough time on the ground.
I was on one estate in the cairngorms this week. I saw 6 red stags and hundreds of sheep
 
Can the stalker claim the relief or is it not just the landowner? If the landowner has other rateable assets then presumably they couldn't claim it, hence passing it on to the stalker.
Stalker can only claim if they are formally the registered lease holder - in my cases the landowners just let out the stalking without formal contract and have that part of the business registered in their name already, and they pay the rates, so they are passed on to me. I’ve dropped one ground already, and might drop another due to the costs going up by 60%, and in one case, over 100%.
 
Can the stalker claim the relief or is it not just the landowner? If the landowner has other rateable assets then presumably they couldn't claim it, hence passing it on to the stalker.
So the landowner needs to make the stalker the responsible person and the stalker then claims the relief.
There really is no need for the vast majority of properties paying these rates
 
Do you have a link to the regulations/legislation on this option by any chance?
For a deer forest, the rateable entity is normally the occupier of the deer forest for sporting purposes. This is the person or organisation with the right to manage and exploit the deer stalking, rather than automatically the owner of the land. The Assessor enters that occupier in the Valuation Roll and they are liable for the non-domestic rates

Small Business Bonus Scheme
 
Last edited:
Back
Top