Interesting on the N133, I’m using N135/25grn Bergers in my .17R too and a couple of years ago I suddenly got a pressure spike on a not particularly hot August day zeroing a new scope, I had to knock the bolt handle open and this was half-way through a 100 batch of ammo that had been fine all the way through from February. Same load as 4 previous batches...
I’m using N133 in my .20Prac and having trouble with that leaving a very wet residue after a shot which is staining to leaving verdigris on the bullet of the next round up the spout. This is ongoing as to why and I had a look down the mod with a Teslong borescope the other day to find a lot of flame cutting, which leads me to consider that it’s not getting the best burn rate out of the powder.
I use the same OneLessCharlie make of moderator on the .17Rem, same 22” length of barrel and the baffles on that are fine.....as are the bullets of the next round in the chamber after a shot. I was running figures through Borbal’s ballistic calculator and Viht N130 was showing a slightly better burn rate at 95% over N133’s 92%.
Perhaps its Viht that’s inconsistent? Bring back Hodgdon’s.
Good this reloading lark ain’t it
cheers
fizz