Why the need to hop up a .270 carbine? Because it has a suppressor on a short barrel?
If it is a stutzen, like a Steyr Mannlicher, Sauer 202, Sako Mannlicher, etc, then do you really need the full potential of the .270 for 300 and 400 yard shots? Or are you using it as a short and handy rifle for the woods and mountains, where a full length bolt action would be a nuisance? A 130 gr bullet at 2,900 fps, and 140 or 150 at 2,850, will take care of business.
If you are just contemplating a carbine for such hunting, take the advice above, and go to a smaller case volume and larger bore, for a bit less loss of efficiency: 7x57, 7mm-08, .308 Win, 8x57 Mauser, or .358 Win.
I searched and searched for the "ideal" Mannlicher, in .308 Winchester. But when I finally found a beautiful Steyr M Luxus in .270 for song, I bought it. And it shoots plenty hot out to 300 yards, for anything for which I will use it. The velocities of the loads has been a pleasant surprise.
If it is a stutzen, like a Steyr Mannlicher, Sauer 202, Sako Mannlicher, etc, then do you really need the full potential of the .270 for 300 and 400 yard shots? Or are you using it as a short and handy rifle for the woods and mountains, where a full length bolt action would be a nuisance? A 130 gr bullet at 2,900 fps, and 140 or 150 at 2,850, will take care of business.
If you are just contemplating a carbine for such hunting, take the advice above, and go to a smaller case volume and larger bore, for a bit less loss of efficiency: 7x57, 7mm-08, .308 Win, 8x57 Mauser, or .358 Win.
I searched and searched for the "ideal" Mannlicher, in .308 Winchester. But when I finally found a beautiful Steyr M Luxus in .270 for song, I bought it. And it shoots plenty hot out to 300 yards, for anything for which I will use it. The velocities of the loads has been a pleasant surprise.