No plain english the cm users don't have the seat up for num 1's as you are bunch of girls lol...ever tried one? The creed ...not sitting down for a wee lol...or are you in the "ignorance is bliss" camp Tim
![]()
No plain english the cm users don't have the seat up for num 1's as you are bunch of girls lol...ever tried one? The creed ...not sitting down for a wee lol...or are you in the "ignorance is bliss" camp Tim
![]()
No plain english the cm users don't have the seat up for num 1's as you are bunch of girls lol
Shot placement is key. Now’t wrong with 243, but if you have a 7x57 then I would using that on bigger deer. I have both, plus a 7x65R. I love my 243, and shot many reds as well as Roe, but the 7mm just has more authority.Was out last evening and shot two bucks with the .243, one dropped on the spot, the other ran 30 yards, although visibly I could see it was a good hit.
These fallow are on prime grass, making 90+kg larder weight, nevertheless the organs must be similar to other fallow.
A run of 30 yards is no big deal normally, but the neighbouring land owner is very much anti shooting and I’m wondering whether I should use the 7x57 on these to ensure a faster drop.
I was tempted but the 243 I have is cloverleafing at 100yards, do I give up some accuracy for the benefit of knockdown power?
Just facts my mate has a group of ladies come to him and all bar 1 they have a cm. Not sure how the world survived before they were madeI love your polite responses Tim but on this occasion you can pop it up the anal tract (yours)
Nowt wrong with the Creed and the same is true of the trusty old .243 ...bullet in the right place = dead animal....bad operator = missed animal ..simples![]()



This ^^^I changed from .243 to .270 for chest shooting fallow for exactly the sort of reason you state. I lost a bit of confidence in the ability of the .243 to knock them down.
However, with the wisdom of hindsight, I now know it was my shot placement that was at fault, and I would be quite happy to go back to using .243 for that purpose now I'm a bit more experienced.
If you’ve got the accuracy and don’t want them to run, head or neck shoot them.Was out last evening and shot two bucks with the .243, one dropped on the spot, the other ran 30 yards, although visibly I could see it was a good hit.
These fallow are on prime grass, making 90+kg larder weight, nevertheless the organs must be similar to other fallow.
A run of 30 yards is no big deal normally, but the neighbouring land owner is very much anti shooting and I’m wondering whether I should use the 7x57 on these to ensure a faster drop.
I was tempted but the 243 I have is cloverleafing at 100yards, do I give up some accuracy for the benefit of knockdown power?
I missed this when it came up and can't make any sense of the markingsThis came up a while ago so might helpThe pic is to highlight the point...obviously you wouldnt shoot this hind where she is stood
View attachment 432121
Stop fussing about those marking just be clear in your own mind where you will put the round, what and how other people go about things has no bearing to your decisions as they are your own.I missed this when it came up and can't make any sense of the markings
Thespot marked will deffo put a deer down. I get that bit . Shoulders are gone so it stays put and significant H/L damage will kill humanely and quicky
What's the significance of the purple spot?
Looks High shoulder, But not even quite right and only an inch off a nasty oesophagus/throat mess
And what's the triangle. Makes no sense at all
There is no consistency between the areas enclosed.
The bottom point of it is definitely not putting the deer down nicely.
The front point is a completely different killing mechanism (heart) to the top point (spine) in which case if we are just marking places which can kill why not include the DSC1 placement and make it a diamond
Not having a go just don't understand the logic of any of it
The triangle is just showing the triangle formed by the shoulder and legI missed this when it came up and can't make any sense of the markings
Thespot marked will deffo put a deer down. I get that bit . Shoulders are gone so it stays put and significant H/L damage will kill humanely and quicky
What's the significance of the purple spot?
Looks High shoulder, But not even quite right and only an inch off a nasty oesophagus/throat mess
And what's the triangle. Makes no sense at all
There is no consistency between the areas enclosed.
The bottom point of it is definitely not putting the deer down nicely.
The front point is a completely different killing mechanism (heart) to the top point (spine) in which case if we are just marking places which can kill why not include the DSC1 placement and make it a diamond
Not having a go just don't understand the logic of any of it
Ah. That makes a lot more senseThe triangle is just showing the triangle formed by the shoulder and leg
The area you need to put your bullet in is called the autonomic plexusI missed this when it came up and can't make any sense of the markings
Thespot marked will deffo put a deer down. I get that bit . Shoulders are gone so it stays put and significant H/L damage will kill humanely and quicky
What's the significance of the purple spot?
Looks High shoulder, But not even quite right and only an inch off a nasty oesophagus/throat mess
And what's the triangle. Makes no sense at all
There is no consistency between the areas enclosed.
The bottom point of it is definitely not putting the deer down nicely.
The front point is a completely different killing mechanism (heart) to the top point (spine) in which case if we are just marking places which can kill why not include the DSC1 placement and make it a diamond
Not having a go just don't understand the logic of any of it
