Strange,Yes - and I have had it said to me on more than one occasion. Not that long ago Fife constabulary would allow .222 and .223 for use on Roe in Fife as anything else was far more dangerous.
They also look at muzzle energy etc and think there is a huge difference between 1,000 ft lbs and 4,000 ft lbs. There is, but I am not sure any sentient being hit by either will know the difference.
I think the powers that be still have a deep seated view on high velocity rifles that dates to the start of the last century and early firearms licencing. They were not far removed from muzzle loading black powder rifles as the main equipment of the military, and then in the 1890’s along come magazine rifles such as the Lee Enfield, Mauser and suddenly the ability to hit man sized objects at many hundreds of yards was well within the capabilities of the average infantry man, rather than a specialist target shooter. And we were in a time of revolution with a new world order.
That institutional memory in the likes of the Police and Home Office will still exist.
in the same area I have had everything from 222 to 300 wm approved and conditioned for any and all deer. On an open certificate, if the urge so took me I could happily use a 300 wm to shoot Roe in Fife. I choose to use a 223 or 308 depending on my whim because it’s capable and cheaper to feed.
Did you question that statement by the officer or civilian staff making the statement ?
I’ve also happily used 243 to shoot reds out to 200 metres, they all dropped some after a short run others on the spot, much the same as any other calibre I have used.
243 is a nice soft shooting accurate round, some bargains to be had in used rifles at the minute for those that don’t get worked up by the hype.