Mine was a Husky. Is the one you're looking at a 96 or a 98?
9.3x62 for Deer?
- Thread starter Matabele
- Start date
Essexsussex
Well-Known Member
alberta boy
Well-Known Member
That is a 96 , I have one exactly like it , it's also known as a Model 46 or 46A . There are slight differences between the two , but I can't remember what they are . The 98 actioned rifles were Model 47s . There has always been some debate over the 96 strength wise . The 98 definitely handles case failure better because of the flange on the bolt shroud , but it isn't that much stronger than the 96, especially if it's a small ring 98 like the Husky . Norma didn't differentiate between the two , so make of it what you will . I never load mine to max anyway . It's a very good large game cartridge and not fussy to reload either . I've used a few over the last 30 years or so .Now you are asking. It’s this one, can you tell from the photo?
AB
Scipio
Well-Known Member
But did i misread or does the 9,3x57 have a (cip i think) max pressure of only 43.511 psi?No I really liked it, but decided I should have a big bore again.
I now have the big bore, and it has dawned on me that a medium would have been better what with copper coming in
The 9.3x57 is a good round, especially in a 98 rather than a 96 as you can load it up a bit more.
Why is it set so low, given that it's x 57 "siblings" and its american "cousins" have max pressures going from the mid 50 k psi to 62 keven? It just seems odd doesnt it, as with a 55 k max pressure this catridge really could be an interesting option for larger game inside 150-200 meters maybe, with less recoil than it's x62 bigger brother.
Yep, i could definitely see it being good for that. It is likely quite useful in shorter barrels too.
Looking at reloading components, it looks like it wont be the easiest or most budget friendly round to buy components and reload for, but the again it isnt really a plinker round either, so i guess the total yearly consumption would be low for most.
Last edited:
Scipio
Well-Known Member
Me and you both mate! Especially one of the factory made short barreled model 1600s would be most welcome in my gun closet in 9,3x57 or 8x57.
I have the 35 Whelen conditioned for deer (AOLQ) which is not far behind the ballistics of the 9.3X62, so I don't see why not.
www.americanhunter.org
K
An Official Journal Of The NRA | Head to Head: .35 Whelen vs. 9.3x62mm Mauser
The .35 Whelen and the 9.3x62mm Mauser have cases within a millimeter in length and a bullet diameter just a few thousandths apart, so which cartridge would a hunter choose?
Scipio
Well-Known Member
Such a cool cartridge! How is it to shoot surpressed and unsupressed , and do you think most hunters would be able to handle it well unsurpressed, or simply more likely end up of disliking it, unless they spend a lot of time training? As Honestjohn wrote, the 9,3x62 And the wheelan) is a lot of boom, after all.I have the 35 Whelen conditioned for deer (AOLQ) which is not far behind the ballistics of the 9.3X62, so I don't see why not.
KAn Official Journal Of The NRA | Head to Head: .35 Whelen vs. 9.3x62mm Mauser
The .35 Whelen and the 9.3x62mm Mauser have cases within a millimeter in length and a bullet diameter just a few thousandths apart, so which cartridge would a hunter choose?
I've yet to shoot the 35 Whelen as the "build" is in progress c/o SD's Dasherman. With regard to use of a moderator this is in no way part of my plan as it would totally mess up the balance and fast-handling of a close quarters woodland fallow basher.
I do however have the only type of hat one is permitted to wear when shooting said cartridge!
K
I do however have the only type of hat one is permitted to wear when shooting said cartridge!
K
Bavarianbrit
Well-Known Member
Is that a US army campaign hat? I saw a lot at Perry back in the day.
Scipio
Well-Known Member
hahaha, yep, with that hat you'll definitely look ready for some good recoil, and some good hunting ,D Sounds like your wheelan build will be relatively compact rifle, then ?
Not to start with as there's a c18-month wait for the stock I want made, so I'm leaving the barrel at 24" for now and sticking the M98 action in a GRS stock.
K
The 9.3 is very manageable
Practice would be more expensive if you don’t reload
However, practice with any rifle / calibre combo is essential
Not comfortable shooting off the bench but I don’t think, whilst stalking, you will remember any recoil off sticks or even off a rest over the bonnet off the landie
So that is where practice should be concentrated
I have found it a 0 to 150m calibre
Not one for long range
J
Ps
Should anyone wish to try it, I’d be happy to accommodate them for the price of the ‘bang’
Practice would be more expensive if you don’t reload
However, practice with any rifle / calibre combo is essential
Not comfortable shooting off the bench but I don’t think, whilst stalking, you will remember any recoil off sticks or even off a rest over the bonnet off the landie
So that is where practice should be concentrated
I have found it a 0 to 150m calibre
Not one for long range
J
Ps
Should anyone wish to try it, I’d be happy to accommodate them for the price of the ‘bang’
Last edited:
Scipio
Well-Known Member
What a nice offer by you, chapeau, sir!
If i didnt live way too far away, i would have taken you up on that. 
UpNorthMI
Well-Known Member
There is not much on this planet that has not been shot with a 9.3 x 62, I have a barrel for my Blaser R8 in this caliber. It's a very versatile cartridge and it's history proves it's capability. I typically shoot 232 - 286 grain loads.
It's unfortunate that many firearms administration units have little practical knowledge and that this caliber is often not approved for use in the UK. Personally I think it's a great selection for red deer and for woodland use in the UK. It remains popular for boar shooting in Europe and remains a very strong favorite across Africa.
Reach out and see what your local people have to say. Good luck.
It's unfortunate that many firearms administration units have little practical knowledge and that this caliber is often not approved for use in the UK. Personally I think it's a great selection for red deer and for woodland use in the UK. It remains popular for boar shooting in Europe and remains a very strong favorite across Africa.
Reach out and see what your local people have to say. Good luck.
6pt-sika
Well-Known Member
I had a Remington 700 Classic in 35 Whelen for awhile and killed several deer with it using 200 grain bullets no problem as you would assume . As to a 9.3x62 I’d wanted one for awhile and was seriously in the market for a CZ 550-FS . But like several other things I waited to long and they ceased making them and the used market for such an item dried up PDQ !
Out of interest, did you ask for it to be used on UK deer and/or wild boar?
I really don't understand on what grounds they can object if you have an Open Certificate and by inference are cleaerly trusted to ensure a safe backstop when using other chamberings. Point being a hillside will stop both a 220 Swift 55g bullet at c4000 FPS and one of 350g from a 375 H&H at c2200 FPS.
K
Klenchblaize..................Yes, I did. I have an open ticket for my 30-06. I will be using the 375 H and H in Africa mainly, but I wanted to try it out first before I took it there. There is a minimum calibre to use on live quarry here, but not a maximum. I mean, can a deer be too dead ?
Similar threads
