I’ve had a few rib slashes with 17 Rem in years gone by.It depends on the calibre, bullet construction and shot angle. Facing away and with a good 6mm+ rifle, aiming for the chocolate starfish will put it down. It's not a shot I'd take with a .22 calibre varmint bullet but my .25-06 shooting 102gr Yew Tree copper drops them on the spot, the whole cavity is turned to soup.
As for what calibre, I wouldn't drop below .222/.223 for a foxing rifle. I prefer a .22-250 and a .243 is better still. I've used all the common .17's, none of them are ideal. The lighter the bullet the more likely it is to fragment if it hits bone. Even a rib can mess with a .17.
A 308 up the arse does work though BenWith respect, I think we should all the "think"ing about that always a anyway, every shot every calibre. Just because your using a 308 doesn't make it ok to shoot it in the arse!? No?
223 shot placement isn't a major issue. .308 most certainly isn't.Not doubting 308 would work - my point was more about "thinking" on shot placement.
Agree 100% - just my opinion but I personally think .22rf is not suitable for charlie and I wouldn't want to use one or an hmr. Yes of course they can be effective at close range and with good bullet placement but far from ideal and very little margin for error.Despite owning and loving my 17 hornet- I wouldn't suggest it for regular fox work. It's capeable- but not as a regular tool IMO.
A 22 CF just gives you so much more authority. It's less affected by the wind- and whilst there's no substitute for accuracy- gives you a little more reassurance and forgiveness. I have also never had a 22CF blow up on the shoulder. I have with a 17 Hornet.
All modern 22CF calibres are equally accurate - provided the shooter, gun and ammo are the same.
Buy any 22CF you wish (or a 204 ruger)- and enjoy a brilliant foxing tool out to all sensible ranges with minimal recoil.
I've seen a failure from the 250! Many actually.Agree 100% - just my opinion but I personally think .22rf is not suitable for charlie and I wouldn't want to use one or an hmr. Yes of course they can be effective at close range and with good bullet placement but far from ideal and very little margin for error.
A .20 or .22cf (or bigger) is a much better choice. I used to use a .22-250 and it was instant lights out even if due to pilot error the shot placement wasn't perfect - never had one even twitch and to me a humane despatch is the most important thing.
When I applied for my FAC, I put down .223 for foxes, but when the FEO visited he informed me that the land wasn't cleared for CF, so suggested 17HMR, and said it would be fine for foxes.Where you based us 22lr and 17hmr a legal calibre fox. I am sure my FO saud I would need a min of .223 or similar. Not sure what the rules are north of border? Actually doubting I heard right about the .22lr and 17hmr.
Surely for the average operator, there must be a round count per year where any amount under that is really not relevant and shouldn't influence the calibre selection. Is an inappropriate rifle that you are not happy with worth a few quid less in ammo cost?Factory 22 hornet ammo will cost more than 223.
The .22 hornet can be finicky and there are plenty who have solved their woes with handloads. The OP didn't give the impression of a being a handloader so the suggestion was to get one proven to shoot factory fodder. The assumption was he would be buying secondhand.If a 22 Hornet won’t shoot worth a hoot…how do you sort it to shoot factory ammo accurately?
Ken.