My view for what its worth - you earn the title of "stalker" because you can get close to your prey and take a safe and certain shot without it knowing you're there.
You're a "killer" to use the words of the original post if you think that shooting is the challenge to be overcome.
Even though we all aim for "certain" shots, we still make mistakes from time to time. So anything that makes a clean kill more likely when you squeeze that trigger is good by me. Top scope, bi-pod, range time, stick - all tools to delivering a humane kill.
Where there's more grey area - and maybe where the original poster was going - is on things like feeding and live update trail cams. Good tools for deer management - but can we still call it stalking ... any thoughts?
+1 best response yet respect for quarry means everything , equipment to me counts for little however using good reliable equipment to make your kills humane could easily be argued that it's showing your quarry respect
This really sums up this thread, combination of technology and a good clean kill!
Problem is the old values are crumbling.
What an interesting and bizzarre-looking film, of which I have not previously heard.
How astonishing to modern ears is the comment on Barry's choice of gun (at 31s). I am allowed a 16bore for cultural reasons (being half-German), but no adult should use an o/u unless they happen to be French, or a 20bore unless they are a lady.
And no, using 28g (or heavier) cartridges in it doesn't somehow make it all right!
What an interesting and bizzarre-looking film, of which I have not previously heard.
How astonishing to modern ears is the comment on Barry's choice of gun (at 31s). I am allowed a 16bore for cultural reasons (being half-German), but no adult should use an o/u unless they happen to be French, or a 20bore unless they are a lady.
And no, using 28g (or heavier) cartridges in it doesn't somehow make it all right!
I run after deer , wrestle them to the ground and then strangle them.![]()
WG I have to agree on public knowledge of where food comes from, we had a news film crew in today, who did not want to film lambs being born, as it could upset some people.
I see a lot a traffic here about high value guns with higher value scopes being shot off of some form of artifical rest, bipod etc. I propose that those using such are not stalkers but rather shooters. A friend of mine who is a professional forester there in the Uk described hiself as a deer killer, not a stalker. I think these folks with their "sniper" set-ups are also "Deer killers", not stalkers. We are no longer subsistance hunters and in my mind are not true sportsmen unless we are shooting off our elbows or at most using a leather sling. Any moron with hi-tech equipment can shoot deer fron long ranges but they are certainly not stalkers.
SS
Sorry Frenchie, keeping chickens rather than eating mcnuggets doesn't make you a stalker, killer maybe lol!
I heard that MARCBO heads out into the wilderness with nothing but body hair for camouflage and maybe a select piece of foliage depending on the season. His weapon is cunning, stealth and his two bare hands.
I heard that MARCBO heads out into the wilderness with nothing but body hair for camouflage and maybe a select piece of foliage depending on the season. His weapon is cunning, stealth and his two bare hands.
This is ridiculous. The speed and reflexes of a deer would make neigh on impossible to stalk and grab a healthy deer. The size of the deer would limit the hunter to deer smaller than fallow. Apart from traps about the only way to do it without rifles or arrows is this way.
10 years to get a deer.