Bavarian mountain hound puppies

Actually Keith,the KC database won’t hold the dogs but the FCI will so it should never happen where dogs are missing on papers.
The globally well known dogs you talk of that aren’t on the papers aren’t very well known by the majority of people.

All the best
George

If you are referring to the 'Unknown Registered' dogs on the KC pedigree in the photo - sorry I disagree, it happens all the time and, like I said, is because of the limited KC database but also exacerbated because of terrible spelling mistakes on the database. I can give countless examples if required.
 
If you are referring to the 'Unknown Registered' dogs on the KC pedigree in the photo - sorry I disagree, it happens all the time and, like I said, is because of the limited KC database but also exacerbated because of terrible spelling mistakes on the database. I can give countless examples if required.
Yes Keith.
It is not because of the limited KC database.
It is because the KC haven’t been bothered to look at the parents of the aforementioned dogs or they are not known.
They will be known under FCI papers.
Please give examples on FCI papers.
As stated,with BGS,the Polish dogs have a database where you can look up the parents anyway.
Please do give examples of BGS or HS.
You should also answer the other questions posed within my post and not just pick what you think is correct.
Dogs within the FCI,in both BGS and HS,will not have “unknown registered”dogs on their papers.
If there is.....they won’t be bred from.
Again,within the ISHV,that is not allowed to happen-ever.
All the best
George
 
Last edited:
Yes Keith.
It is not because of the limited KC database.
It is because the KC haven’t been bothered to look at the parents of the aforementioned dogs or they are not known.
They will be known under FCI papers.
Please give examples on FCI papers.
As stated,with BGS,the Polish dogs have a database where you can look up the parents anyway.
Please do give examples of BGS or HS.
You should also answer the other questions posed within my post and not just pick what you think is correct.
Dogs within the FCI,in both BGS and HS,will not have “unknown registered”dogs on their papers.
If there is.....they won’t be bred from.
Again,within the ISHV,that is not allowed to happen-ever.
All the best
George

George, I will try to to clarify/simplify, let's try this method......

You said "Always be wary when there are unknown dogs within papers. Why are they unknown ?


I said " Some good points on the post but, regarding 'unknown registered' on a KC pedigree, this simply means that the dogs are not on the KC's database. The KC's database is pretty poor, from a global perspective, and many globally very well known dogs do not appear on it. It is also full of spelling mistakes ".

I stand by that statement purely based on the the experience one breed - and I can indeed give plenty of examples. I am sure every breed has the same issues with KC pedigrees. You are correct that the KC database is limited simply because they cannot be bothered to do some research and update it.

All the other stuff? Not really interested, I was just pointing out that the words "unknown registered" on a KC pedigree is not something to necessarily be alarmed about. 5 minutes research will soon establish the facts.
 
As I stated......the UK KC is not a good registry.
No examples of HS or BGS on FCI papers and it’s not up to people to do research to find dogs on papers.
“Unknown registered” on KC papers or indeed any papers should not happen otherwise they aren’t full papers that are being paid for.
Simple really.

d0nni-good news about Lexi.
 
Here is a picture of Lexi post pregnancy. Good strong healthy dog.

Also definitely in pup. Due date is the end of august. Hopefully all goes ok 👍

IMG-20181213-WA0012.webp
 
Back
Top