Like all these courses, what you get out of it depends to a large extent upon the what you put into it and the attitude you take.
I took my DSC1 back in 2001 in a course organised by the BDS at Cirencester over two consecutive weekends. Obviously my opinion is therefore dated, although I know some of the instructors are still very much involved in the organisation and delivery of the current course. The students had a wide range of skill and experience, from complete newbies to very experienced deer stalkers.
I am fortunate to have a very good friend who has been my stalking mentor for 10 years, but I still learned a lot from the course, met some great people and would recommend it to anyone starting out in stalking. The instructors made a big effort to not just teach the letter but also the spirit of the course. They also took a lot of time to help students who found specific elements of the course challenging or who were out of practice/nervous of the exam. Every question was answered, and answered pragmatically.
As someone who personally undertakes a lot of presentations at conferences, and who delivers training across Europe, I could be nitpicking and point out possible improvements in technique and delivery, but this would be to entirely miss the point. All the students not just passed the course, but came away enthused about deer and deer stalking, which surely is what we are aiming for?
Both the courses and the instructors should, of course, be reviewed and validated, and if there are errors in either case they should be corrected. But the instructors don't need to be professional trainers or presenters - they need to be able to get the message across to a widely divergent audience in a way that generates interest and enthusiasm.
At the end of the day no-one is 'forced' to go on these courses, you pay your money and take your choice. There are plenty of examples on TSD of people who have obtained their firearms certificate without gaining the DSC1.
willie_gunn
I took my DSC1 back in 2001 in a course organised by the BDS at Cirencester over two consecutive weekends. Obviously my opinion is therefore dated, although I know some of the instructors are still very much involved in the organisation and delivery of the current course. The students had a wide range of skill and experience, from complete newbies to very experienced deer stalkers.
I am fortunate to have a very good friend who has been my stalking mentor for 10 years, but I still learned a lot from the course, met some great people and would recommend it to anyone starting out in stalking. The instructors made a big effort to not just teach the letter but also the spirit of the course. They also took a lot of time to help students who found specific elements of the course challenging or who were out of practice/nervous of the exam. Every question was answered, and answered pragmatically.
As someone who personally undertakes a lot of presentations at conferences, and who delivers training across Europe, I could be nitpicking and point out possible improvements in technique and delivery, but this would be to entirely miss the point. All the students not just passed the course, but came away enthused about deer and deer stalking, which surely is what we are aiming for?
Both the courses and the instructors should, of course, be reviewed and validated, and if there are errors in either case they should be corrected. But the instructors don't need to be professional trainers or presenters - they need to be able to get the message across to a widely divergent audience in a way that generates interest and enthusiasm.
At the end of the day no-one is 'forced' to go on these courses, you pay your money and take your choice. There are plenty of examples on TSD of people who have obtained their firearms certificate without gaining the DSC1.
willie_gunn