You could argue that anyone who has seen a deer once could be stalking them soon too? What could possibly go wrong? Hopefully there will be professionals on standby when deer are wounded. I’m sure the people bringing this in have mitigations in place though. Plan for the worst and hope for the best. I wish the lucky stalkers the best of luck.Jesus suffering ****. We moan constantly that there’s no opportunity for local people to get involved in stalking without paying lots of money, someone makes a positive step and everyone who’s see a deer once decides to explain why they don’t think it will work.
Well done NatureScot.
Hit the nail on the headHell how did most folk on here start before quals were invented??
Have to agree countrryboy but it wasn't just the shooting aspect that might cause safety issues. There's so much to think about. The possibility of people getting lost and or injured in foul weather has crossed my mind. There's certainly much to be done but certainly do able and a great opportunity.I really don't want to belittle any safety concerns but in reality upland stalking in daylight is about as safe a thing u can do stalking/rifle wise. ( big open areas, most likely plenty elevation/back stop and generally a bit of time to see beasts too)
Lamping/NV/thermal fox/rabbit shooting is probably the more dodgy end of the spectrum safety wise and u need to be on the ball paying attention do u have the same concerns about ever newbie on a farmers fields???
I really hope it taskes off and is a success, would be good to see more ideas like this across scotland.
Althou i imagine could be a bit of hard work for the organiser/captain at times keeping everyone right and paperwork up to date.
Fair play to SNH/nature scot not often i'll say that sentence
You could argue that anyone who has seen a deer once could be stalking them soon too? What could possibly go wrong? Hopefully there will be professionals on standby when deer are wounded. I’m sure the people bringing this in have mitigations in place though. Plan for the worst and hope for the best. I wish the lucky stalkers the best of luck.
Have to agree countrryboy but it wasn't just the shooting aspect that might cause safety issues. There's so much to think about. The possibility of people getting lost and or injured in foul weather has crossed my mind. There's certainly much to be done but certainly do able and a great opportunity.
I don’t think its actually Nature Scots idea.This has been suggested by highland communities for some time.Niall Rowntree has been quite vociferous in his support for it!I think NS are just bending with the wind!Jesus suffering ****. We moan constantly that there’s no opportunity for local people to get involved in stalking without paying lots of money, someone makes a positive step and everyone who’s see a deer once decides to explain why they don’t think it will work.
Well done NatureScot.
I met him and he was all for the community deer management.From people putting food on their own table to locals becoming full time deer managers and everything in between.I don’t think its actually Nature Scots idea.This has been suggested by highland communities for some time.Niall Rowntree has been quite vociferous in his support for it!I think NS are just bending with the wind!![]()
Your thoughts are completely wide of the mark. No bending in the wind involved.I don’t think its actually Nature Scots idea.This has been suggested by highland communities for some time.Niall Rowntree has been quite vociferous in his support for it!I think NS are just bending with the wind!![]()
This hits the nail on the head, in the SNPs communist state known as Scotland, good land management = annihilation of deer. I’m pretty sure their objective is to reduce deer numbers to such low levels that recreational stalking is not possible and large estates can’t derive an income. The SNP is not a friend of field sports.It’s for sure not about sustainability or management of deer - they are viewed as ‘the problem’ in the piece - albeit a problem in a habitat of the land managers’ own making - it’s about maximising pressure on them with a view to eradication/minimising numbers on the area in the bid to help make the scrub there grow. Eventually conditions will be suitable over large tracts of Scotland in order for the lynx and possibly the wolf to be reintroduced, this is the longer term objective, though not everyone recognises or necessarily agrees with the idea.
10,000 acres on any sporting hill estate would not amount to more than 2 stalking beats, but of course it was different there in Beaton the elder’s days. Objectives have changed, and it is a type of ‘progress‘, where the human condition, that of the deer, and sustainable management of the resource and related local community activity, infrastructure and cohesion play second fiddle to the principal objective of now; times have changed for sure. Naturescot are probably looking to make use of extra boots on the ground to reduce numbers and maintain pressure on those deer remaining in the most cost-effective manner. Funny how this approach isn’t that of other public agencies still splurging large sums of taxpayers money on deer control - as yet - as on paper there are relatively few downsides, unless you happen to be the deer.
It reminds me too a little of a similar sized but low ground estate which had 24 Rifles permitted to be on the ground, also run by an agency supremo. That one didn’t end well, but this time it’ll doubtless be different. Many will doubtless watch on at this site with interest too.
Is it stalking though?
Oh, I would be! Don't forget you've just been given advice by the most experienced, knowledgeable, skilled, erudite, and best-looking member on the forum. Disregarding the fact we've had not absolutely not a shred of evidence, the fact he repeats the same sentiments time and time again should be ample proof of just how valuable his contributions are. I just wonder how he finds the time to share his wisdom with us, what with all the saving-of-the-world, rebellion-crushing, and virgin deflowering he must get up to . . . . . . . .No need to be nervous.
You make me laugh Woodsmoke. How about showing us what you know on here and age this deer and tell us your reasons. It's a trophy buck so right up your street. Roe buck ageOh, I would be! Don't forget you've just been given advice by the most experienced, knowledgeable, skilled, erudite, and best-looking member on the forum. Disregarding the fact we've had not absolutely not a shred of evidence, the fact he repeats the same sentiments time and time again should be ample proof of just how valuable his contributions are. I just wonder how he finds the time to share his wisdom with us, what with all the saving-of-the-world, rebellion-crushing, and virgin deflowering he must get up to . . . . . . . .
Don’t believe that ,NS is a quango run by the extreme leftistSNP party who would like to eliminate private deer stalking and just have rangers or contractors “controlling “ deer. Niall and others have been pushing this idea of community deer control for years !The people on the ground know what deer numbers are acceptable for their area and can use the income generated for the benefit of those communities.Your thoughts are completely wide of the mark. No bending in the wind involved.
This has come about purely from NS estate staff and wildlife team discussions.