paul o'
Well-Known Member
Defo Not his keeper lolI do like it when couples use the same ammunition...![]()
Nor am I a sheep

Defo Not his keeper lolI do like it when couples use the same ammunition...![]()

They are a little bit more expensive, but - in my opinion - not enough to matter. My own concerns with copper bullets relate more to welfare and freedom-of-choice issues.haven't seen prices for the copper bullets here in Ireland yet, any of ye have a price range from the UK for common caliber's.
just had a look ya don't mind the price a such, its the welfare of the animal i'm afraid of will they be up to the same standards of your conventional lead bullets.They are a little bit more expensive, but - in my opinion - not enough to matter. My own concerns with copper bullets relate more to welfare and freedom-of-choice issues.
Take a look at 1967Spud for relative pricing in the UK.
The UK's #1 Reloading Kit Supplier | 1967Spud Reloading Supplies Ltd
All the kit herewww.1967spud.com
There's a few good threads with discussions on the subject. Have a browse. I am a sceptic and quite resistant to copper; however, there are several people on here whose views I respect that have been using them to good effect for many years.just had a look ya don't mind the price a such, its the welfare of the animal i'm afraid of will they be up to the same standards of your conventional lead bullets.
They’re about 50 Euro a box when you can find them.haven't seen prices for the copper bullets here in Ireland yet, any of ye have a price range from the UK for common caliber's.
You want copper got to reloading solutions I paid £47 a box spud wants £60 for BarnesThey are a little bit more expensive, but - in my opinion - not enough to matter. My own concerns with copper bullets relate more to welfare and freedom-of-choice issues.
Take a look at 1967Spud for relative pricing in the UK.
The UK's #1 Reloading Kit Supplier | 1967Spud Reloading Supplies Ltd
All the kit herewww.1967spud.com
Carl you are definitely slowing coming round!There's a few good threads with discussions on the subject. Have a browse. I am a sceptic and quite resistant to copper; however, there are several people on here whose views I respect that have been using them to good effect for many years.
Always good to give the dog something to do...Carl you are definitely slowing coming round!
They look like arrow heads!!!Anyone tried Pritz?
Just cut to expand, they look interestingThey look like arrow heads!!!
Or……..@brave echo niner , QL seriously underestimates mv for all non-lead bullets with driving bands, predicted by QL 2857, found by chrono that load gave 3018fps. This due to the fact that the driving band produces less friction, and engraving a driving band requires less energy than engraving a normal bullet, even through the material is harder.
Most of the 'boutique' bullet manufacturers are using cnc machines, which whilst being capable of a high output, it is nowhere near as fast as the pressure forming process, and driving bands give problems for pressure forming in that they probably require a split mould to facilitate bullet release. This would be more expensive, complex and slower than the normal process. The advantages of CNC machining is that minor changes to the bullet shape can be made very easily,-a few lines of code have to be changed, as opposed to waiting for a new mould to be made and installed. Similarly a different sized calibre can be made merely by loading a different program and feedstock.
Getting great accuracy in my 260 rem with 100 grain ttsx ( 1-8 twist ) by that I mean sub moa most often 0.5 moa out to 250 yards . Not got as good from 120s but haven't messed with that load much as I only bought a single box of 50, none the less I haven't seen bigger groups than moa . I will be pushing the speed a bit though haven't bothered to chrono yet I just went up till I found a stiff bolt and extractor marks as is my common practice then backed off ( on a hit day ) I don't recommend the practice to others just saying what I doFor interests sake only these are some Barnes TTSX bullets I dug out of our range backstop last w/e after some testing.
My concern would be, relying on expansion at anything below 2,200fps for a humane and quick kill with any of these wouldn't be advisable.
The .308 really did perform the closest to a cup/core bullet but at range of 300m (even 250m) it's fallen off way too much to keep this up but may well be adequate. The 6.5x55 100g's appear to mushroom nicely with a bit of velocity to spare for further distance. The 120g's at just over 2,500fps were already showing signs that at further range they would be coming up against their limitations.
If the 6.5 bullets were more accurate I would do this test at 200m and 300m but their accuracy is so shite they might hit my chrono!