long_range_rob
Well-Known Member
I’ll be interested to see how Surrey get on with my sons application then. Thirty years medical records for a man of 19 years 
There are a number of professional occupational health companies that do work related medicals to allow people to work in various industries.One of my customers was charged £100 for a HGV medical so he could transport his 12 ton steam roller about. I doubt he needs a HGV to drive the roller. He says there is a firm doing it for £45 but he'll be 81 next time, so won't bother.
My surgery charged me £80 for the HGV medical. I don't think I'll ask them next time.
if you are paying for the firearms report, it is not covered by the NHS and YOU ARE getting it on a private basis. as my brother in law pointed out to his GP when they delayed.... he had paid for a service and they were obliged to deliver it promptly as they were contractually obliged to do so as they had said they would.I'd wager if you were wealthy enough to be seeing your GP on a private basis, they'd leave their personal views out of it.
FWIW I have just checked my recent GP report, it does not require the doctor to express opinions, it asks for confirmation whether the medical records contain history of certain matters to which they tick yes or no. There is provision thereafter for the GP to raise any other matters of concern, not entirely what this would be, but it relates to mediacla or physical conditions/or combinations of conditions which may affect the safe possession of firearms or shotguns, and space to expand on any treatments or concerns.Ultimately the GP is being asked to carry out a box ticking exercise. If you have a lengthy medical history they will need to spend time going through your records. If you havent seen them in decades it should be simple exercise. I can see why some refuse as they are operating as a professional consultant out side the NHS. I dont agree with any of them refusing though as they arent being asked their personal opinion on firearms ownership. On that basis presumably some GP`s refuse to sign off HGV drivers as they may kill someone. Hmmm. Finally - probably the biggest mass killer in the UK - Harold Shipman - GP.
I have just used shootcert, it has taken a couple of weeks as at first my surgery wanted to charge to supply the records ! shootcert sorted it out and I have just uploaded the renewal, not free (at £90) but to be honest not so bad in this day and ageSo I dropped off the forms to my surgery having ascertained my GP is happy to attend to them.
6 weeks later I have heard nothing inspite of me chasing it last week and being assured he will do it.
This is now holding up my renewal and time is passing.
I will message them again but I will also email licensing to let them know I am trying to renew but being held back thru no fault of mine.
And probably too late to go through shooters cert now if I have to deal with surgery again to get my med records.
I dont really have any medical history either.
I will ask licensing if I can send in the paper forms pending GP report.
This is something I can do with out!
GDPR establishes a clear distinction between sensitive personal data and non-sensitive personal data. Examples of non-sensitive data would include gender, date of birth, place of birth and postcode.I am redoing my SGC and the reference section now asks for their D.O.B. That's a new one on me as with the data protection act they should not have to tell me that IMO.
It seems to be a newly made up add on to me.GDPR establishes a clear distinction between sensitive personal data and non-sensitive personal data. Examples of non-sensitive data would include gender, date of birth, place of birth and postcode.
It may be. It is however, still not sensitive data.It seems to be a newly made up add on to me.
Why would there be a marker on your medical files that you're a Firearms certificate holder? The police already know that information. I don't understand what you're say, that's all.If a GP Refuses to participate in grants and renewals as mine has, then there is no marker on your medical records to say you are a firearms holder, This seems to go against what the Police are trying to acheive
Part of this whole process, it to get the Medics involved, by completing the 'tick box' questions from the Police and by adding a 'marker' to your medical files.Why would there be a marker on your medical files that you're a Firearms certificate holder?
This is being resisted by the BMA, but as GP’s tend not to strike it’s a difficult fight for them. They simply don’t want any liability in case it goes wrong!That 'marker' is to alert/remind the Medics, that you own firearms and so that they can then act accordingly if and when the patient presents with issues that would affect their possession/ownership of firearms.
Thank you. I'm surprised that that is even legal. Treat me as a person. Not what I do for a living or what I do in my spare time.Part of this whole process, it to get the Medics involved, by completing the 'tick box' questions from the Police and by adding a 'marker' to your medical files.
That 'marker' is to alert/remind the Medics, that you own firearms and so that they can then act accordingly if and when the patient presents with issues that would affect their possession/ownership of firearms.
Not what I do for a living or what I do in my spare time.
Absolutely. And long before a Dr who doesn't know me very well flags it up with the police. IMO, this is one case of Big brother that really could put someone off from seeking medical help when a little bit of help from the Dr could really positive benefits.I do not think it is anything sinister.
It is just trying to prevent the next tragedy.
If I became dependant on alcohol, or drugs, or became mentally unwell, I would hope and expect, that those near to me, would pick up the phone and let the Police know.
Personally, I have no issues with it.
... really could put someone off from seeking medical help when a little bit of help from the Dr could really positive benefits.